|
Browse categories
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 Customer Reviews
Excellent well rounded book, 26 Mar 2008
I much prefer this medical text to Kumar and Clark. IT is very logical and explains subjects well.
The Best Bargain, 07 Nov 2007
After studying Harrison's principles of internal medicine throughout my final year i knew that it's not possible to review from it, So i decided to buy Davidson which i guess that it contains the largest amount of comprehensive informations in the smallest size possible.
The thing i loved in this book that it goes directly to the point which is important for answering the true&false type of questions.
The way this book explaining PATHOPHYSIOLOGY of diseases is brief, complete,updated, and i guess thats way a lot of people love this book.
The book is not useful for American students or countries following American guide line because of lot differences between the American and British medical systems which i have noticed after studying both books and this will make answer some of questions wrongly.
Problem with Davidson is the extensive use of tables which sometimes contain things not mentioned in the text and some of them are extremely rare for an undergraduate to know.
Chapters on CVS, Respiratory, Hematology, Rheumatology, DM, & HIV where very nice.
Attitudes have changed, 22 Jan 2007
I can see a major change in peoples attitudes and expectations from any given book. I am sure a lot of senior doctors would agree with me that one cant learn everything from one book and the one who realises this early on in the profession goes long way.
Brilliant, 21 Jan 2007
Davidson's is the best textbook of clinical medicine I have encountered. I own Kumar & Clarke as well but did not end up using it as much as i found it quite a boring read. It is detailed and structured but does not incite an interest in the subject like Davidson's does. The way information is presented in Davidson's also makes it easy to retain. And it has all the important information and the right emphasis on each topic. I also really like the EBM summaries presented in the little boxes found throughout the book. Wish I had found it earlier. Recommended for all medical students and practising doctors. I agree with the other reviewers- Davidson's is in my opinion a much better textbook than Kumar & Clarke, which I found very encyclopedic.
not helpful for the MRCP, 06 Mar 2006
Having strayed away from this book for a couple of years since qualifying I returned to it whilst studying for the MRCP.
Fortunately i quickly realized that the over edited text tends to miss out the slighty more idiosyncratic MRCP facts e.g i challenge you to find the pattern of motion wall movement on cardiac USS in HOCM - key information in the part 2.
The lack of chapters on molecular medicine, immunology and statistics is also unhelpful. In the end i used question books and Kalra and easily passed the part 1.
I find that the old adage is still true - read davidson's and you understand medicine; just don't expect it to distill important MRCP info for you.
I hear the next edition is going to be more MRCP friendly.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Customer Reviews
Excellent well rounded book, 26 Mar 2008
I much prefer this medical text to Kumar and Clark. IT is very logical and explains subjects well. The Best Bargain, 07 Nov 2007
After studying Harrison's principles of internal medicine throughout my final year i knew that it's not possible to review from it, So i decided to buy Davidson which i guess that it contains the largest amount of comprehensive informations in the smallest size possible.
The thing i loved in this book that it goes directly to the point which is important for answering the true&false type of questions.
The way this book explaining PATHOPHYSIOLOGY of diseases is brief, complete,updated, and i guess thats way a lot of people love this book.
The book is not useful for American students or countries following American guide line because of lot differences between the American and British medical systems which i have noticed after studying both books and this will make answer some of questions wrongly.
Problem with Davidson is the extensive use of tables which sometimes contain things not mentioned in the text and some of them are extremely rare for an undergraduate to know.
Chapters on CVS, Respiratory, Hematology, Rheumatology, DM, & HIV where very nice. Attitudes have changed, 22 Jan 2007
I can see a major change in peoples attitudes and expectations from any given book. I am sure a lot of senior doctors would agree with me that one cant learn everything from one book and the one who realises this early on in the profession goes long way. Brilliant, 21 Jan 2007
Davidson's is the best textbook of clinical medicine I have encountered. I own Kumar & Clarke as well but did not end up using it as much as i found it quite a boring read. It is detailed and structured but does not incite an interest in the subject like Davidson's does. The way information is presented in Davidson's also makes it easy to retain. And it has all the important information and the right emphasis on each topic. I also really like the EBM summaries presented in the little boxes found throughout the book. Wish I had found it earlier. Recommended for all medical students and practising doctors. I agree with the other reviewers- Davidson's is in my opinion a much better textbook than Kumar & Clarke, which I found very encyclopedic. not helpful for the MRCP, 06 Mar 2006
Having strayed away from this book for a couple of years since qualifying I returned to it whilst studying for the MRCP. Fortunately i quickly realized that the over edited text tends to miss out the slighty more idiosyncratic MRCP facts e.g i challenge you to find the pattern of motion wall movement on cardiac USS in HOCM - key information in the part 2. The lack of chapters on molecular medicine, immunology and statistics is also unhelpful. In the end i used question books and Kalra and easily passed the part 1. I find that the old adage is still true - read davidson's and you understand medicine; just don't expect it to distill important MRCP info for you. I hear the next edition is going to be more MRCP friendly. What you need to pass mrcp part 1, 19 Feb 2006
Took mrcp part 1 with less than 3mth experience in internal medicine. Aced it with just studying this book. Medicine posting is so busy, you just need to read this book & get the essense to pass. Not much clnical experience needed either. Get it and you won't regret it! a virtual entry requirement; concise but patchy, 06 Jan 2006
Like so many others before me i bought this book expecting great things. The hefty price tag alone seemed to be evidence of its brilliance (and the publishers caching in). The price clearly doesn't reflect the content or binding; compare davidson's. The book consists of a comprehensive list of system based chapters including the ones we all tend to neglect e.g. molecular medicine.
As i first approached chapters like cardiology i was shocked by the lack of substantive content. It put me off so much i let the book gather dust for several months, in favour of more traditional texts and MCQ books. Indeed many people say not to the bother with formal texts and just go for MCQs.
It is now 3 weeks before the exam and i'm realizing how useful the book is. Unfortunately many excellent books like Davidson's are just not MRCP friendly. In contrast this book is practical and readable given the busy timetable of working SHOs.
The chapters i once thought were brief now seem full of essential facts, and devoid of the interesting but MRCP-useless facts found in other texts.
There is a danger that a book like this could become mere lists but the chapter on endocrinology is an example of an excellent piece of science writing.
The chapters on molecular stuff and epidemiology are worth the price alone. There are many medical statistics books out there masquerading as concisely distilled information perfect for SHOs but in reality they are over the top for MRCP part 1. The major let down in the book is the infectious diseases chapters. This was a real chance for the book to shine but sadly essential diseases like leishmania are completely missed out. Overall its an important part of my revision shedule but not the dominant force, which remains every good MCQ book i can get my hands on. The third edition needs to be less patchy.
Cracking Read, 05 Jan 2006
First of all, I would recommend not sitting the exam. It is currently ruining my life. If you are masochistic enough to want to sit it, this book has all of the info you need. And my, what a lot of info.
an amazingly good book, 03 Sep 2003
This is a surprisingly good book for the MRCP I exams. It distils the most relevant facts in an easy to read format. If you are preparing for the MRCP I and you have little time (as most of us), you definitely need this book.
My suggestions for those preparing for the Part I:
1. Begin with the Color Atlas and Text of Clinical Medicine by Charles Forbes, et al. This book will gently introduce you to the whole of clinical medicine without taxing your brains.
2. Continue with the Essential Revision Notes for MRCP. Read it at least 2 or 3 times. It is only 660 pages, and shouldn't take that much time to read.
3. Begin practice questions, and ensure you practice MANY questions, checking up difficult cases from the reference books (e.g. Oxfords or Harisson's). A good source of questions is the onexamination.com
4. Round up your revision with the Essential Revision Notes, and
5. Confidently sit for the exams. Your chances of passing are well above 90%.
As in most exams, your success depends heavily on whether or not you read the relevant materials, and your familiarity with the types of questions set. The Essential Revision Notes for MRCP will take care of the former, and frequent practice will take care of the latter.
All you need to pass!, 03 Mar 2002
Well ok, this book and a lot of hard graft should see you pass. Big problem about the MRCP? Too much information and you haven't a clue where to start. This book gives you an idea of the level of study and knowledge the Royal College expects. Some useful lists and also reviews of those subjects you just glossed over at medical school and in a style easy enough for a surgeon to read! Seriously useful book. Used in conjunction with as many MCQs as you can get your hands on should give you a good chance.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Customer Reviews
Excellent well rounded book, 26 Mar 2008
I much prefer this medical text to Kumar and Clark. IT is very logical and explains subjects well. The Best Bargain, 07 Nov 2007
After studying Harrison's principles of internal medicine throughout my final year i knew that it's not possible to review from it, So i decided to buy Davidson which i guess that it contains the largest amount of comprehensive informations in the smallest size possible.
The thing i loved in this book that it goes directly to the point which is important for answering the true&false type of questions.
The way this book explaining PATHOPHYSIOLOGY of diseases is brief, complete,updated, and i guess thats way a lot of people love this book.
The book is not useful for American students or countries following American guide line because of lot differences between the American and British medical systems which i have noticed after studying both books and this will make answer some of questions wrongly.
Problem with Davidson is the extensive use of tables which sometimes contain things not mentioned in the text and some of them are extremely rare for an undergraduate to know.
Chapters on CVS, Respiratory, Hematology, Rheumatology, DM, & HIV where very nice. Attitudes have changed, 22 Jan 2007
I can see a major change in peoples attitudes and expectations from any given book. I am sure a lot of senior doctors would agree with me that one cant learn everything from one book and the one who realises this early on in the profession goes long way. Brilliant, 21 Jan 2007
Davidson's is the best textbook of clinical medicine I have encountered. I own Kumar & Clarke as well but did not end up using it as much as i found it quite a boring read. It is detailed and structured but does not incite an interest in the subject like Davidson's does. The way information is presented in Davidson's also makes it easy to retain. And it has all the important information and the right emphasis on each topic. I also really like the EBM summaries presented in the little boxes found throughout the book. Wish I had found it earlier. Recommended for all medical students and practising doctors. I agree with the other reviewers- Davidson's is in my opinion a much better textbook than Kumar & Clarke, which I found very encyclopedic. not helpful for the MRCP, 06 Mar 2006
Having strayed away from this book for a couple of years since qualifying I returned to it whilst studying for the MRCP. Fortunately i quickly realized that the over edited text tends to miss out the slighty more idiosyncratic MRCP facts e.g i challenge you to find the pattern of motion wall movement on cardiac USS in HOCM - key information in the part 2. The lack of chapters on molecular medicine, immunology and statistics is also unhelpful. In the end i used question books and Kalra and easily passed the part 1. I find that the old adage is still true - read davidson's and you understand medicine; just don't expect it to distill important MRCP info for you. I hear the next edition is going to be more MRCP friendly. What you need to pass mrcp part 1, 19 Feb 2006
Took mrcp part 1 with less than 3mth experience in internal medicine. Aced it with just studying this book. Medicine posting is so busy, you just need to read this book & get the essense to pass. Not much clnical experience needed either. Get it and you won't regret it! a virtual entry requirement; concise but patchy, 06 Jan 2006
Like so many others before me i bought this book expecting great things. The hefty price tag alone seemed to be evidence of its brilliance (and the publishers caching in). The price clearly doesn't reflect the content or binding; compare davidson's. The book consists of a comprehensive list of system based chapters including the ones we all tend to neglect e.g. molecular medicine.
As i first approached chapters like cardiology i was shocked by the lack of substantive content. It put me off so much i let the book gather dust for several months, in favour of more traditional texts and MCQ books. Indeed many people say not to the bother with formal texts and just go for MCQs.
It is now 3 weeks before the exam and i'm realizing how useful the book is. Unfortunately many excellent books like Davidson's are just not MRCP friendly. In contrast this book is practical and readable given the busy timetable of working SHOs.
The chapters i once thought were brief now seem full of essential facts, and devoid of the interesting but MRCP-useless facts found in other texts.
There is a danger that a book like this could become mere lists but the chapter on endocrinology is an example of an excellent piece of science writing.
The chapters on molecular stuff and epidemiology are worth the price alone. There are many medical statistics books out there masquerading as concisely distilled information perfect for SHOs but in reality they are over the top for MRCP part 1. The major let down in the book is the infectious diseases chapters. This was a real chance for the book to shine but sadly essential diseases like leishmania are completely missed out. Overall its an important part of my revision shedule but not the dominant force, which remains every good MCQ book i can get my hands on. The third edition needs to be less patchy.
Cracking Read, 05 Jan 2006
First of all, I would recommend not sitting the exam. It is currently ruining my life. If you are masochistic enough to want to sit it, this book has all of the info you need. And my, what a lot of info.
an amazingly good book, 03 Sep 2003
This is a surprisingly good book for the MRCP I exams. It distils the most relevant facts in an easy to read format. If you are preparing for the MRCP I and you have little time (as most of us), you definitely need this book.
My suggestions for those preparing for the Part I:
1. Begin with the Color Atlas and Text of Clinical Medicine by Charles Forbes, et al. This book will gently introduce you to the whole of clinical medicine without taxing your brains.
2. Continue with the Essential Revision Notes for MRCP. Read it at least 2 or 3 times. It is only 660 pages, and shouldn't take that much time to read.
3. Begin practice questions, and ensure you practice MANY questions, checking up difficult cases from the reference books (e.g. Oxfords or Harisson's). A good source of questions is the onexamination.com
4. Round up your revision with the Essential Revision Notes, and
5. Confidently sit for the exams. Your chances of passing are well above 90%.
As in most exams, your success depends heavily on whether or not you read the relevant materials, and your familiarity with the types of questions set. The Essential Revision Notes for MRCP will take care of the former, and frequent practice will take care of the latter.
All you need to pass!, 03 Mar 2002
Well ok, this book and a lot of hard graft should see you pass. Big problem about the MRCP? Too much information and you haven't a clue where to start. This book gives you an idea of the level of study and knowledge the Royal College expects. Some useful lists and also reviews of those subjects you just glossed over at medical school and in a style easy enough for a surgeon to read! Seriously useful book. Used in conjunction with as many MCQs as you can get your hands on should give you a good chance.
BRILLIANT!, 11 Sep 2008
This book does exactly what it says on the tin, it is an absolute God Send, it demonstrates clear concepts to answer what can be difficult and confusing topics. It is well laid & thought out and covers a lot of important concepts beautifully, with great diagrams. A must have for the Primary!
A lifesaver!, 18 Mar 2008
I have been waiting for this book to come out for 6 mths! I am sitting my Final FRCA in the next 4 weeks and having been impressed by the drafts, the real thing reads very well and is even MORE IMPRESSIVE! I only recieved it 2 days ago but I can already say it has made life a lot easier and studying more focused to things that are important.
I wish I had a book like this during my Primary. I will definitely be recommending it to SHO/SpRs alike.
Two thumbs up to the authors - THANK YOU AND WELL DONE!
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Customer Reviews
Excellent well rounded book, 26 Mar 2008
I much prefer this medical text to Kumar and Clark. IT is very logical and explains subjects well. The Best Bargain, 07 Nov 2007
After studying Harrison's principles of internal medicine throughout my final year i knew that it's not possible to review from it, So i decided to buy Davidson which i guess that it contains the largest amount of comprehensive informations in the smallest size possible.
The thing i loved in this book that it goes directly to the point which is important for answering the true&false type of questions.
The way this book explaining PATHOPHYSIOLOGY of diseases is brief, complete,updated, and i guess thats way a lot of people love this book.
The book is not useful for American students or countries following American guide line because of lot differences between the American and British medical systems which i have noticed after studying both books and this will make answer some of questions wrongly.
Problem with Davidson is the extensive use of tables which sometimes contain things not mentioned in the text and some of them are extremely rare for an undergraduate to know.
Chapters on CVS, Respiratory, Hematology, Rheumatology, DM, & HIV where very nice. Attitudes have changed, 22 Jan 2007
I can see a major change in peoples attitudes and expectations from any given book. I am sure a lot of senior doctors would agree with me that one cant learn everything from one book and the one who realises this early on in the profession goes long way. Brilliant, 21 Jan 2007
Davidson's is the best textbook of clinical medicine I have encountered. I own Kumar & Clarke as well but did not end up using it as much as i found it quite a boring read. It is detailed and structured but does not incite an interest in the subject like Davidson's does. The way information is presented in Davidson's also makes it easy to retain. And it has all the important information and the right emphasis on each topic. I also really like the EBM summaries presented in the little boxes found throughout the book. Wish I had found it earlier. Recommended for all medical students and practising doctors. I agree with the other reviewers- Davidson's is in my opinion a much better textbook than Kumar & Clarke, which I found very encyclopedic. not helpful for the MRCP, 06 Mar 2006
Having strayed away from this book for a couple of years since qualifying I returned to it whilst studying for the MRCP. Fortunately i quickly realized that the over edited text tends to miss out the slighty more idiosyncratic MRCP facts e.g i challenge you to find the pattern of motion wall movement on cardiac USS in HOCM - key information in the part 2. The lack of chapters on molecular medicine, immunology and statistics is also unhelpful. In the end i used question books and Kalra and easily passed the part 1. I find that the old adage is still true - read davidson's and you understand medicine; just don't expect it to distill important MRCP info for you. I hear the next edition is going to be more MRCP friendly. What you need to pass mrcp part 1, 19 Feb 2006
Took mrcp part 1 with less than 3mth experience in internal medicine. Aced it with just studying this book. Medicine posting is so busy, you just need to read this book & get the essense to pass. Not much clnical experience needed either. Get it and you won't regret it! a virtual entry requirement; concise but patchy, 06 Jan 2006
Like so many others before me i bought this book expecting great things. The hefty price tag alone seemed to be evidence of its brilliance (and the publishers caching in). The price clearly doesn't reflect the content or binding; compare davidson's. The book consists of a comprehensive list of system based chapters including the ones we all tend to neglect e.g. molecular medicine.
As i first approached chapters like cardiology i was shocked by the lack of substantive content. It put me off so much i let the book gather dust for several months, in favour of more traditional texts and MCQ books. Indeed many people say not to the bother with formal texts and just go for MCQs.
It is now 3 weeks before the exam and i'm realizing how useful the book is. Unfortunately many excellent books like Davidson's are just not MRCP friendly. In contrast this book is practical and readable given the busy timetable of working SHOs.
The chapters i once thought were brief now seem full of essential facts, and devoid of the interesting but MRCP-useless facts found in other texts.
There is a danger that a book like this could become mere lists but the chapter on endocrinology is an example of an excellent piece of science writing.
The chapters on molecular stuff and epidemiology are worth the price alone. There are many medical statistics books out there masquerading as concisely distilled information perfect for SHOs but in reality they are over the top for MRCP part 1. The major let down in the book is the infectious diseases chapters. This was a real chance for the book to shine but sadly essential diseases like leishmania are completely missed out. Overall its an important part of my revision shedule but not the dominant force, which remains every good MCQ book i can get my hands on. The third edition needs to be less patchy.
Cracking Read, 05 Jan 2006
First of all, I would recommend not sitting the exam. It is currently ruining my life. If you are masochistic enough to want to sit it, this book has all of the info you need. And my, what a lot of info.
an amazingly good book, 03 Sep 2003
This is a surprisingly good book for the MRCP I exams. It distils the most relevant facts in an easy to read format. If you are preparing for the MRCP I and you have little time (as most of us), you definitely need this book.
My suggestions for those preparing for the Part I:
1. Begin with the Color Atlas and Text of Clinical Medicine by Charles Forbes, et al. This book will gently introduce you to the whole of clinical medicine without taxing your brains.
2. Continue with the Essential Revision Notes for MRCP. Read it at least 2 or 3 times. It is only 660 pages, and shouldn't take that much time to read.
3. Begin practice questions, and ensure you practice MANY questions, checking up difficult cases from the reference books (e.g. Oxfords or Harisson's). A good source of questions is the onexamination.com
4. Round up your revision with the Essential Revision Notes, and
5. Confidently sit for the exams. Your chances of passing are well above 90%.
As in most exams, your success depends heavily on whether or not you read the relevant materials, and your familiarity with the types of questions set. The Essential Revision Notes for MRCP will take care of the former, and frequent practice will take care of the latter.
All you need to pass!, 03 Mar 2002
Well ok, this book and a lot of hard graft should see you pass. Big problem about the MRCP? Too much information and you haven't a clue where to start. This book gives you an idea of the level of study and knowledge the Royal College expects. Some useful lists and also reviews of those subjects you just glossed over at medical school and in a style easy enough for a surgeon to read! Seriously useful book. Used in conjunction with as many MCQs as you can get your hands on should give you a good chance.
BRILLIANT!, 11 Sep 2008
This book does exactly what it says on the tin, it is an absolute God Send, it demonstrates clear concepts to answer what can be difficult and confusing topics. It is well laid & thought out and covers a lot of important concepts beautifully, with great diagrams. A must have for the Primary!
A lifesaver!, 18 Mar 2008
I have been waiting for this book to come out for 6 mths! I am sitting my Final FRCA in the next 4 weeks and having been impressed by the drafts, the real thing reads very well and is even MORE IMPRESSIVE! I only recieved it 2 days ago but I can already say it has made life a lot easier and studying more focused to things that are important.
I wish I had a book like this during my Primary. I will definitely be recommending it to SHO/SpRs alike.
Two thumbs up to the authors - THANK YOU AND WELL DONE!
Not as good as Hall - buy it anyway because you need it for Paces, 03 Mar 2007
The problem with MRCP Paces is that there aren't that many books out there to read. The main texts are this book, the Tim Hall book and the Baliga book.
In my opinion the Hall text the two Ryder books. The Ryder books tend to jump from one topic to another, almost as though you are reading what came into Ryder's head next! The Hall book, by contrast treats each station comprehensively and in a logical format.
Baliga doesn't have many pictures (as noted in many of the reviews under that book) and is far more theoretical than either the Hall and Ryder books.
Ryder doesn't appear to give much emphasis to the communication and ethics stations - certainly not in as comprehensive a manner as Hall.
Having said all this, it's slightly unfair to compare the Hall book to Ryder and Baliga as Hall has the definite advantage of having been published later and so can respond to how the Paces exam has developed.
My advice is to buy all four books (this, the second Ryder book, Hall and Baliga). They all have different detailed examples in them and it's important that you get as wide a variety of examples before taking the Paces. As noted above, there aren't enough books out there currently for Paces candidates to pick and choose books.
Anyone want to write one?
This is the Ultimate Prep Book for PACES, 13 Dec 2004
An absolute essential book while preparing for the PACES.There is an intial introduction about systematic examination of various systems and then it plunges headlong into the most common possibilities under station 1,3,5.Its does not give diffrentails for every station but what it mentions on the 'findings delivery' bit is pure gold!."This exam is passes on how well you can sell your findings".The various anecdotes and experiences of past candidates are excellent and a great reminder of how unpredicatble this exam can be.whatever it is,it teaches you the correct things to say when faced with the typical exam patient[which is something you would otherwise bump into once in 2years!].Use it in conjuction with baliga and a good clinical course -it 'll make the exam easily passable.I did-and passed in the first attempt!.
An aid to the MRCP PACES, 19 Sep 2004
An aid to the MRCP PACES by Ryder/Mir is just a continuation of the 2nd edition of an aid to the MRCP short cases by Ryder/Mir(Which was aimed at the clinical part of old MRCP)and so does not fully conform to the new MRCP PACES EXam; the book covers only the clinical diagnosis of individual diseases without any discussion of their management and other relevant issues
I would highly recommend this book to any MRCP PACES candida, 11 Sep 2003
Ryder has provided many MRCP candidates to fall on with the first and second editions of his MRCP bible. It's clear and no-nonsense approach, right to the point analysis of a clinical problem has allowed candidates to crystalise their thoughts before presenting their final answers to examiners. Read through the pages to understand the magical impact of this book.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Customer Reviews
Excellent well rounded book, 26 Mar 2008
I much prefer this medical text to Kumar and Clark. IT is very logical and explains subjects well. The Best Bargain, 07 Nov 2007
After studying Harrison's principles of internal medicine throughout my final year i knew that it's not possible to review from it, So i decided to buy Davidson which i guess that it contains the largest amount of comprehensive informations in the smallest size possible.
The thing i loved in this book that it goes directly to the point which is important for answering the true&false type of questions.
The way this book explaining PATHOPHYSIOLOGY of diseases is brief, complete,updated, and i guess thats way a lot of people love this book.
The book is not useful for American students or countries following American guide line because of lot differences between the American and British medical systems which i have noticed after studying both books and this will make answer some of questions wrongly.
Problem with Davidson is the extensive use of tables which sometimes contain things not mentioned in the text and some of them are extremely rare for an undergraduate to know.
Chapters on CVS, Respiratory, Hematology, Rheumatology, DM, & HIV where very nice. Attitudes have changed, 22 Jan 2007
I can see a major change in peoples attitudes and expectations from any given book. I am sure a lot of senior doctors would agree with me that one cant learn everything from one book and the one who realises this early on in the profession goes long way. Brilliant, 21 Jan 2007
Davidson's is the best textbook of clinical medicine I have encountered. I own Kumar & Clarke as well but did not end up using it as much as i found it quite a boring read. It is detailed and structured but does not incite an interest in the subject like Davidson's does. The way information is presented in Davidson's also makes it easy to retain. And it has all the important information and the right emphasis on each topic. I also really like the EBM summaries presented in the little boxes found throughout the book. Wish I had found it earlier. Recommended for all medical students and practising doctors. I agree with the other reviewers- Davidson's is in my opinion a much better textbook than Kumar & Clarke, which I found very encyclopedic. not helpful for the MRCP, 06 Mar 2006
Having strayed away from this book for a couple of years since qualifying I returned to it whilst studying for the MRCP. Fortunately i quickly realized that the over edited text tends to miss out the slighty more idiosyncratic MRCP facts e.g i challenge you to find the pattern of motion wall movement on cardiac USS in HOCM - key information in the part 2. The lack of chapters on molecular medicine, immunology and statistics is also unhelpful. In the end i used question books and Kalra and easily passed the part 1. I find that the old adage is still true - read davidson's and you understand medicine; just don't expect it to distill important MRCP info for you. I hear the next edition is going to be more MRCP friendly. What you need to pass mrcp part 1, 19 Feb 2006
Took mrcp part 1 with less than 3mth experience in internal medicine. Aced it with just studying this book. Medicine posting is so busy, you just need to read this book & get the essense to pass. Not much clnical experience needed either. Get it and you won't regret it! a virtual entry requirement; concise but patchy, 06 Jan 2006
Like so many others before me i bought this book expecting great things. The hefty price tag alone seemed to be evidence of its brilliance (and the publishers caching in). The price clearly doesn't reflect the content or binding; compare davidson's. The book consists of a comprehensive list of system based chapters including the ones we all tend to neglect e.g. molecular medicine.
As i first approached chapters like cardiology i was shocked by the lack of substantive content. It put me off so much i let the book gather dust for several months, in favour of more traditional texts and MCQ books. Indeed many people say not to the bother with formal texts and just go for MCQs.
It is now 3 weeks before the exam and i'm realizing how useful the book is. Unfortunately many excellent books like Davidson's are just not MRCP friendly. In contrast this book is practical and readable given the busy timetable of working SHOs.
The chapters i once thought were brief now seem full of essential facts, and devoid of the interesting but MRCP-useless facts found in other texts.
There is a danger that a book like this could become mere lists but the chapter on endocrinology is an example of an excellent piece of science writing.
The chapters on molecular stuff and epidemiology are worth the price alone. There are many medical statistics books out there masquerading as concisely distilled information perfect for SHOs but in reality they are over the top for MRCP part 1. The major let down in the book is the infectious diseases chapters. This was a real chance for the book to shine but sadly essential diseases like leishmania are completely missed out. Overall its an important part of my revision shedule but not the dominant force, which remains every good MCQ book i can get my hands on. The third edition needs to be less patchy.
Cracking Read, 05 Jan 2006
First of all, I would recommend not sitting the exam. It is currently ruining my life. If you are masochistic enough to want to sit it, this book has all of the info you need. And my, what a lot of info.
an amazingly good book, 03 Sep 2003
This is a surprisingly good book for the MRCP I exams. It distils the most relevant facts in an easy to read format. If you are preparing for the MRCP I and you have little time (as most of us), you definitely need this book.
My suggestions for those preparing for the Part I:
1. Begin with the Color Atlas and Text of Clinical Medicine by Charles Forbes, et al. This book will gently introduce you to the whole of clinical medicine without taxing your brains.
2. Continue with the Essential Revision Notes for MRCP. Read it at least 2 or 3 times. It is only 660 pages, and shouldn't take that much time to read.
3. Begin practice questions, and ensure you practice MANY questions, checking up difficult cases from the reference books (e.g. Oxfords or Harisson's). A good source of questions is the onexamination.com
4. Round up your revision with the Essential Revision Notes, and
5. Confidently sit for the exams. Your chances of passing are well above 90%.
As in most exams, your success depends heavily on whether or not you read the relevant materials, and your familiarity with the types of questions set. The Essential Revision Notes for MRCP will take care of the former, and frequent practice will take care of the latter.
All you need to pass!, 03 Mar 2002
Well ok, this book and a lot of hard graft should see you pass. Big problem about the MRCP? Too much information and you haven't a clue where to start. This book gives you an idea of the level of study and knowledge the Royal College expects. Some useful lists and also reviews of those subjects you just glossed over at medical school and in a style easy enough for a surgeon to read! Seriously useful book. Used in conjunction with as many MCQs as you can get your hands on should give you a good chance.
BRILLIANT!, 11 Sep 2008
This book does exactly what it says on the tin, it is an absolute God Send, it demonstrates clear concepts to answer what can be difficult and confusing topics. It is well laid & thought out and covers a lot of important concepts beautifully, with great diagrams. A must have for the Primary!
A lifesaver!, 18 Mar 2008
I have been waiting for this book to come out for 6 mths! I am sitting my Final FRCA in the next 4 weeks and having been impressed by the drafts, the real thing reads very well and is even MORE IMPRESSIVE! I only recieved it 2 days ago but I can already say it has made life a lot easier and studying more focused to things that are important.
I wish I had a book like this during my Primary. I will definitely be recommending it to SHO/SpRs alike.
Two thumbs up to the authors - THANK YOU AND WELL DONE!
Not as good as Hall - buy it anyway because you need it for Paces, 03 Mar 2007
The problem with MRCP Paces is that there aren't that many books out there to read. The main texts are this book, the Tim Hall book and the Baliga book.
In my opinion the Hall text the two Ryder books. The Ryder books tend to jump from one topic to another, almost as though you are reading what came into Ryder's head next! The Hall book, by contrast treats each station comprehensively and in a logical format.
Baliga doesn't have many pictures (as noted in many of the reviews under that book) and is far more theoretical than either the Hall and Ryder books.
Ryder doesn't appear to give much emphasis to the communication and ethics stations - certainly not in as comprehensive a manner as Hall.
Having said all this, it's slightly unfair to compare the Hall book to Ryder and Baliga as Hall has the definite advantage of having been published later and so can respond to how the Paces exam has developed.
My advice is to buy all four books (this, the second Ryder book, Hall and Baliga). They all have different detailed examples in them and it's important that you get as wide a variety of examples before taking the Paces. As noted above, there aren't enough books out there currently for Paces candidates to pick and choose books.
Anyone want to write one?
This is the Ultimate Prep Book for PACES, 13 Dec 2004
An absolute essential book while preparing for the PACES.There is an intial introduction about systematic examination of various systems and then it plunges headlong into the most common possibilities under station 1,3,5.Its does not give diffrentails for every station but what it mentions on the 'findings delivery' bit is pure gold!."This exam is passes on how well you can sell your findings".The various anecdotes and experiences of past candidates are excellent and a great reminder of how unpredicatble this exam can be.whatever it is,it teaches you the correct things to say when faced with the typical exam patient[which is something you would otherwise bump into once in 2years!].Use it in conjuction with baliga and a good clinical course -it 'll make the exam easily passable.I did-and passed in the first attempt!.
An aid to the MRCP PACES, 19 Sep 2004
An aid to the MRCP PACES by Ryder/Mir is just a continuation of the 2nd edition of an aid to the MRCP short cases by Ryder/Mir(Which was aimed at the clinical part of old MRCP)and so does not fully conform to the new MRCP PACES EXam; the book covers only the clinical diagnosis of individual diseases without any discussion of their management and other relevant issues
I would highly recommend this book to any MRCP PACES candida, 11 Sep 2003
Ryder has provided many MRCP candidates to fall on with the first and second editions of his MRCP bible. It's clear and no-nonsense approach, right to the point analysis of a clinical problem has allowed candidates to crystalise their thoughts before presenting their final answers to examiners. Read through the pages to understand the magical impact of this book.
great book+great service, 07 Jun 2005
it is extrememely good and a must have book especially for mrcp students.....and this site is the bst place to buy it...superfast delivery and no hassle system....believe me first i ordered from another site and got stuck waiting for two weeks ultimately had to cancel order...but with amazon it was great....
The secret weapon for communication and history stations, 09 Mar 2004
A must have book for any candidate who is seriously preparing for the MRCP PACES .Also a life saver for someone who has a lack of time or enough UK experience to be comfortable with the system.
The discussion in both the history taking and ethics section is invaluable in daily medical practice. I wish I had this book much earlier!
|
|
|
 |
|
OSCEs for Dentistry
Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
*Best price found from Amazon Marketplace seller
|
*Amazon: £15.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Customer Reviews
Excellent well rounded book, 26 Mar 2008
I much prefer this medical text to Kumar and Clark. IT is very logical and explains subjects well. The Best Bargain, 07 Nov 2007
After studying Harrison's principles of internal medicine throughout my final year i knew that it's not possible to review from it, So i decided to buy Davidson which i guess that it contains the largest amount of comprehensive informations in the smallest size possible.
The thing i loved in this book that it goes directly to the point which is important for answering the true&false type of questions.
The way this book explaining PATHOPHYSIOLOGY of diseases is brief, complete,updated, and i guess thats way a lot of people love this book.
The book is not useful for American students or countries following American guide line because of lot differences between the American and British medical systems which i have noticed after studying both books and this will make answer some of questions wrongly.
Problem with Davidson is the extensive use of tables which sometimes contain things not mentioned in the text and some of them are extremely rare for an undergraduate to know.
Chapters on CVS, Respiratory, Hematology, Rheumatology, DM, & HIV where very nice. Attitudes have changed, 22 Jan 2007
I can see a major change in peoples attitudes and expectations from any given book. I am sure a lot of senior doctors would agree with me that one cant learn everything from one book and the one who realises this early on in the profession goes long way. Brilliant, 21 Jan 2007
Davidson's is the best textbook of clinical medicine I have encountered. I own Kumar & Clarke as well but did not end up using it as much as i found it quite a boring read. It is detailed and structured but does not incite an interest in the subject like Davidson's does. The way information is presented in Davidson's also makes it easy to retain. And it has all the important information and the right emphasis on each topic. I also really like the EBM summaries presented in the little boxes found throughout the book. Wish I had found it earlier. Recommended for all medical students and practising doctors. I agree with the other reviewers- Davidson's is in my opinion a much better textbook than Kumar & Clarke, which I found very encyclopedic. not helpful for the MRCP, 06 Mar 2006
Having strayed away from this book for a couple of years since qualifying I returned to it whilst studying for the MRCP. Fortunately i quickly realized that the over edited text tends to miss out the slighty more idiosyncratic MRCP facts e.g i challenge you to find the pattern of motion wall movement on cardiac USS in HOCM - key information in the part 2. The lack of chapters on molecular medicine, immunology and statistics is also unhelpful. In the end i used question books and Kalra and easily passed the part 1. I find that the old adage is still true - read davidson's and you understand medicine; just don't expect it to distill important MRCP info for you. I hear the next edition is going to be more MRCP friendly. What you need to pass mrcp part 1, 19 Feb 2006
Took mrcp part 1 with less than 3mth experience in internal medicine. Aced it with just studying this book. Medicine posting is so busy, you just need to read this book & get the essense to pass. Not much clnical experience needed either. Get it and you won't regret it! a virtual entry requirement; concise but patchy, 06 Jan 2006
Like so many others before me i bought this book expecting great things. The hefty price tag alone seemed to be evidence of its brilliance (and the publishers caching in). The price clearly doesn't reflect the content or binding; compare davidson's. The book consists of a comprehensive list of system based chapters including the ones we all tend to neglect e.g. molecular medicine.
As i first approached chapters like cardiology i was shocked by the lack of substantive content. It put me off so much i let the book gather dust for several months, in favour of more traditional texts and MCQ books. Indeed many people say not to the bother with formal texts and just go for MCQs.
It is now 3 weeks before the exam and i'm realizing how useful the book is. Unfortunately many excellent books like Davidson's are just not MRCP friendly. In contrast this book is practical and readable given the busy timetable of working SHOs.
The chapters i once thought were brief now seem full of essential facts, and devoid of the interesting but MRCP-useless facts found in other texts.
There is a danger that a book like this could become mere lists but the chapter on endocrinology is an example of an excellent piece of science writing.
The chapters on molecular stuff and epidemiology are worth the price alone. There are many medical statistics books out there masquerading as concisely distilled information perfect for SHOs but in reality they are over the top for MRCP part 1. The major let down in the book is the infectious diseases chapters. This was a real chance for the book to shine but sadly essential diseases like leishmania are completely missed out. Overall its an important part of my revision shedule but not the dominant force, which remains every good MCQ book i can get my hands on. The third edition needs to be less patchy.
Cracking Read, 05 Jan 2006
First of all, I would recommend not sitting the exam. It is currently ruining my life. If you are masochistic enough to want to sit it, this book has all of the info you need. And my, what a lot of info.
an amazingly good book, 03 Sep 2003
This is a surprisingly good book for the MRCP I exams. It distils the most relevant facts in an easy to read format. If you are preparing for the MRCP I and you have little time (as most of us), you definitely need this book.
My suggestions for those preparing for the Part I:
1. Begin with the Color Atlas and Text of Clinical Medicine by Charles Forbes, et al. This book will gently introduce you to the whole of clinical medicine without taxing your brains.
2. Continue with the Essential Revision Notes for MRCP. Read it at least 2 or 3 times. It is only 660 pages, and shouldn't take that much time to read.
3. Begin practice questions, and ensure you practice MANY questions, checking up difficult cases from the reference books (e.g. Oxfords or Harisson's). A good source of questions is the onexamination.com
4. Round up your revision with the Essential Revision Notes, and
5. Confidently sit for the exams. Your chances of passing are well above 90%.
As in most exams, your success depends heavily on whether or not you read the relevant materials, and your familiarity with the types of questions set. The Essential Revision Notes for MRCP will take care of the former, and frequent practice will take care of the latter.
All you need to pass!, 03 Mar 2002
Well ok, this book and a lot of hard graft should see you pass. Big problem about the MRCP? Too much information and you haven't a clue where to start. This book gives you an idea of the level of study and knowledge the Royal College expects. Some useful lists and also reviews of those subjects you just glossed over at medical school and in a style easy enough for a surgeon to read! Seriously useful book. Used in conjunction with as many MCQs as you can get your hands on should give you a good chance.
BRILLIANT!, 11 Sep 2008
This book does exactly what it says on the tin, it is an absolute God Send, it demonstrates clear concepts to answer what can be difficult and confusing topics. It is well laid & thought out and covers a lot of important concepts beautifully, with great diagrams. A must have for the Primary!
A lifesaver!, 18 Mar 2008
I have been waiting for this book to come out for 6 mths! I am sitting my Final FRCA in the next 4 weeks and having been impressed by the drafts, the real thing reads very well and is even MORE IMPRESSIVE! I only recieved it 2 days ago but I can already say it has made life a lot easier and studying more focused to things that are important.
I wish I had a book like this during my Primary. I will definitely be recommending it to SHO/SpRs alike.
Two thumbs up to the authors - THANK YOU AND WELL DONE!
Not as good as Hall - buy it anyway because you need it for Paces, 03 Mar 2007
The problem with MRCP Paces is that there aren't that many books out there to read. The main texts are this book, the Tim Hall book and the Baliga book.
In my opinion the Hall text the two Ryder books. The Ryder books tend to jump from one topic to another, almost as though you are reading what came into Ryder's head next! The Hall book, by contrast treats each station comprehensively and in a logical format.
Baliga doesn't have many pictures (as noted in many of the reviews under that book) and is far more theoretical than either the Hall and Ryder books.
Ryder doesn't appear to give much emphasis to the communication and ethics stations - certainly not in as comprehensive a manner as Hall.
Having said all this, it's slightly unfair to compare the Hall book to Ryder and Baliga as Hall has the definite advantage of having been published later and so can respond to how the Paces exam has developed.
My advice is to buy all four books (this, the second Ryder book, Hall and Baliga). They all have different detailed examples in them and it's important that you get as wide a variety of examples before taking the Paces. As noted above, there aren't enough books out there currently for Paces candidates to pick and choose books.
Anyone want to write one?
This is the Ultimate Prep Book for PACES, 13 Dec 2004
An absolute essential book while preparing for the PACES.There is an intial introduction about systematic examination of various systems and then it plunges headlong into the most common possibilities under station 1,3,5.Its does not give diffrentails for every station but what it mentions on the 'findings delivery' bit is pure gold!."This exam is passes on how well you can sell your findings".The various anecdotes and experiences of past candidates are excellent and a great reminder of how unpredicatble this exam can be.whatever it is,it teaches you the correct things to say when faced with the typical exam patient[which is something you would otherwise bump into once in 2years!].Use it in conjuction with baliga and a good clinical course -it 'll make the exam easily passable.I did-and passed in the first attempt!.
An aid to the MRCP PACES, 19 Sep 2004
An aid to the MRCP PACES by Ryder/Mir is just a continuation of the 2nd edition of an aid to the MRCP short cases by Ryder/Mir(Which was aimed at the clinical part of old MRCP)and so does not fully conform to the new MRCP PACES EXam; the book covers only the clinical diagnosis of individual diseases without any discussion of their management and other relevant issues
I would highly recommend this book to any MRCP PACES candida, 11 Sep 2003
Ryder has provided many MRCP candidates to fall on with the first and second editions of his MRCP bible. It's clear and no-nonsense approach, right to the point analysis of a clinical problem has allowed candidates to crystalise their thoughts before presenting their final answers to examiners. Read through the pages to understand the magical impact of this book.
great book+great service, 07 Jun 2005
it is extrememely good and a must have book especially for mrcp students.....and this site is the bst place to buy it...superfast delivery and no hassle system....believe me first i ordered from another site and got stuck waiting for two weeks ultimately had to cancel order...but with amazon it was great....
The secret weapon for communication and history stations, 09 Mar 2004
A must have book for any candidate who is seriously preparing for the MRCP PACES .Also a life saver for someone who has a lack of time or enough UK experience to be comfortable with the system.
The discussion in both the history taking and ethics section is invaluable in daily medical practice. I wish I had this book much earlier!
Heavy going, 24 Apr 2007
Very heavy going but very good. Has more than you will need to know. Would also recommend Kalra.
All you never to ace your basic sciences, 19 Feb 2006
People say you need to restudy preclinical years studying of basic sciences. But hey, with this book, you don't touch any of them. It's got all the information you ever need for the your basic sciences. No need to study from other books to pass your part 1 whichever exams you take, mrcp, mrcpch,... you name it! I did it, so can you!
Excellent book, 05 Sep 2005
This is an excellent book for undergraduate revision and I would particularly recommend it to students on accelerated 4yr medical courses. This book covers the key preclinical themes that are covered at undergraduate level (although it misses pathology). The topics are covered in sufficient depth (although anatomy is more 'answers to key questions' rather than a sufficient guide in itself). It is well written and very good for exam revision. The reason I recommend it to medics on the 4yr course is that it is better as a memory refresher rather than as a first introduction to physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, etc.
Not beginner, not intermediate, not advanced, but AWESOME, 16 Aug 2004
This book is presented as a potted guide to basic sciences for the part 1 and that's exactly what it is. It provides the basic info so as to work out things from first principle. It is true what my mentor said, U read this book and thats all you need for basic science and pharm and part 1 is yours baby. Not beginner, not intermediate, not advanced, but AWESOME
This book fails to live up to expectations, 02 Dec 2001
Along with everyone else who sit the part 1 exam i bought this book. However it fails to provide the obscure facts required for the modern part 1....at least 5 years out of date!
Spend your well earned money on something else you will actually use!
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Customer Reviews
Excellent well rounded book, 26 Mar 2008
I much prefer this medical text to Kumar and Clark. IT is very logical and explains subjects well. The Best Bargain, 07 Nov 2007
After studying Harrison's principles of internal medicine throughout my final year i knew that it's not possible to review from it, So i decided to buy Davidson which i guess that it contains the largest amount of comprehensive informations in the smallest size possible.
The thing i loved in this book that it goes directly to the point which is important for answering the true&false type of questions.
The way this book explaining PATHOPHYSIOLOGY of diseases is brief, complete,updated, and i guess thats way a lot of people love this book.
The book is not useful for American students or countries following American guide line because of lot differences between the American and British medical systems which i have noticed after studying both books and this will make answer some of questions wrongly.
Problem with Davidson is the extensive use of tables which sometimes contain things not mentioned in the text and some of them are extremely rare for an undergraduate to know.
Chapters on CVS, Respiratory, Hematology, Rheumatology, DM, & HIV where very nice. Attitudes have changed, 22 Jan 2007
I can see a major change in peoples attitudes and expectations from any given book. I am sure a lot of senior doctors would agree with me that one cant learn everything from one book and the one who realises this early on in the profession goes long way. Brilliant, 21 Jan 2007
Davidson's is the best textbook of clinical medicine I have encountered. I own Kumar & Clarke as well but did not end up using it as much as i found it quite a boring read. It is detailed and structured but does not incite an interest in the subject like Davidson's does. The way information is presented in Davidson's also makes it easy to retain. And it has all the important information and the right emphasis on each topic. I also really like the EBM summaries presented in the little boxes found throughout the book. Wish I had found it earlier. Recommended for all medical students and practising doctors. I agree with the other reviewers- Davidson's is in my opinion a much better textbook than Kumar & Clarke, which I found very encyclopedic. not helpful for the MRCP, 06 Mar 2006
Having strayed away from this book for a couple of years since qualifying I returned to it whilst studying for the MRCP. Fortunately i quickly realized that the over edited text tends to miss out the slighty more idiosyncratic MRCP facts e.g i challenge you to find the pattern of motion wall movement on cardiac USS in HOCM - key information in the part 2. The lack of chapters on molecular medicine, immunology and statistics is also unhelpful. In the end i used question books and Kalra and easily passed the part 1. I find that the old adage is still true - read davidson's and you understand medicine; just don't expect it to distill important MRCP info for you. I hear the next edition is going to be more MRCP friendly. What you need to pass mrcp part 1, 19 Feb 2006
Took mrcp part 1 with less than 3mth experience in internal medicine. Aced it with just studying this book. Medicine posting is so busy, you just need to read this book & get the essense to pass. Not much clnical experience needed either. Get it and you won't regret it! a virtual entry requirement; concise but patchy, 06 Jan 2006
Like so many others before me i bought this book expecting great things. The hefty price tag alone seemed to be evidence of its brilliance (and the publishers caching in). The price clearly doesn't reflect the content or binding; compare davidson's. The book consists of a comprehensive list of system based chapters including the ones we all tend to neglect e.g. molecular medicine.
As i first approached chapters like cardiology i was shocked by the lack of substantive content. It put me off so much i let the book gather dust for several months, in favour of more traditional texts and MCQ books. Indeed many people say not to the bother with formal texts and just go for MCQs.
It is now 3 weeks before the exam and i'm realizing how useful the book is. Unfortunately many excellent books like Davidson's are just not MRCP friendly. In contrast this book is practical and readable given the busy timetable of working SHOs.
The chapters i once thought were brief now seem full of essential facts, and devoid of the interesting but MRCP-useless facts found in other texts.
There is a danger that a book like this could become mere lists but the chapter on endocrinology is an example of an excellent piece of science writing.
The chapters on molecular stuff and epidemiology are worth the price alone. There are many medical statistics books out there masquerading as concisely distilled information perfect for SHOs but in reality they are over the top for MRCP part 1. The major let down in the book is the infectious diseases chapters. This was a real chance for the book to shine but sadly essential diseases like leishmania are completely missed out. Overall its an important part of my revision shedule but not the dominant force, which remains every good MCQ book i can get my hands on. The third edition needs to be less patchy.
Cracking Read, 05 Jan 2006
First of all, I would recommend not sitting the exam. It is currently ruining my life. If you are masochistic enough to want to sit it, this book has all of the info you need. And my, what a lot of info.
an amazingly good book, 03 Sep 2003
This is a surprisingly good book for the MRCP I exams. It distils the most relevant facts in an easy to read format. If you are preparing for the MRCP I and you have little time (as most of us), you definitely need this book.
My suggestions for those preparing for the Part I:
1. Begin with the Color Atlas and Text of Clinical Medicine by Charles Forbes, et al. This book will gently introduce you to the whole of clinical medicine without taxing your brains.
2. Continue with the Essential Revision Notes for MRCP. Read it at least 2 or 3 times. It is only 660 pages, and shouldn't take that much time to read.
3. Begin practice questions, and ensure you practice MANY questions, checking up difficult cases from the reference books (e.g. Oxfords or Harisson's). A good source of questions is the onexamination.com
4. Round up your revision with the Essential Revision Notes, and
5. Confidently sit for the exams. Your chances of passing are well above 90%.
As in most exams, your success depends heavily on whether or not you read the relevant materials, and your familiarity with the types of questions set. The Essential Revision Notes for MRCP will take care of the former, and frequent practice will take care of the latter.
All you need to pass!, 03 Mar 2002
Well ok, this book and a lot of hard graft should see you pass. Big problem about the MRCP? Too much information and you haven't a clue where to start. This book gives you an idea of the level of study and knowledge the Royal College expects. Some useful lists and also reviews of those subjects you just glossed over at medical school and in a style easy enough for a surgeon to read! Seriously useful book. Used in conjunction with as many MCQs as you can get your hands on should give you a good chance.
BRILLIANT!, 11 Sep 2008
This book does exactly what it says on the tin, it is an absolute God Send, it demonstrates clear concepts to answer what can be difficult and confusing topics. It is well laid & thought out and covers a lot of important concepts beautifully, with great diagrams. A must have for the Primary!
A lifesaver!, 18 Mar 2008
I have been waiting for this book to come out for 6 mths! I am sitting my Final FRCA in the next 4 weeks and having been impressed by the drafts, the real thing reads very well and is even MORE IMPRESSIVE! I only recieved it 2 days ago but I can already say it has made life a lot easier and studying more focused to things that are important.
I wish I had a book like this during my Primary. I will definitely be recommending it to SHO/SpRs alike.
Two thumbs up to the authors - THANK YOU AND WELL DONE!
Not as good as Hall - buy it anyway because you need it for Paces, 03 Mar 2007
The problem with MRCP Paces is that there aren't that many books out there to read. The main texts are this book, the Tim Hall book and the Baliga book.
In my opinion the Hall text the two Ryder books. The Ryder books tend to jump from one topic to another, almost as though you are reading what came into Ryder's head next! The Hall book, by contrast treats each station comprehensively and in a logical format.
Baliga doesn't have many pictures (as noted in many of the reviews under that book) and is far more theoretical than either the Hall and Ryder books.
Ryder doesn't appear to give much emphasis to the communication and ethics stations - certainly not in as comprehensive a manner as Hall.
Having said all this, it's slightly unfair to compare the Hall book to Ryder and Baliga as Hall has the definite advantage of having been published later and so can respond to how the Paces exam has developed.
My advice is to buy all four books (this, the second Ryder book, Hall and Baliga). They all have different detailed examples in them and it's important that you get as wide a variety of examples before taking the Paces. As noted above, there aren't enough books out there currently for Paces candidates to pick and choose books.
Anyone want to write one?
This is the Ultimate Prep Book for PACES, 13 Dec 2004
An absolute essential book while preparing for the PACES.There is an intial introduction about systematic examination of various systems and then it plunges headlong into the most common possibilities under station 1,3,5.Its does not give diffrentails for every station but what it mentions on the 'findings delivery' bit is pure gold!."This exam is passes on how well you can sell your findings".The various anecdotes and experiences of past candidates are excellent and a great reminder of how unpredicatble this exam can be.whatever it is,it teaches you the correct things to say when faced with the typical exam patient[which is something you would otherwise bump into once in 2years!].Use it in conjuction with baliga and a good clinical course -it 'll make the exam easily passable.I did-and passed in the first attempt!.
An aid to the MRCP PACES, 19 Sep 2004
An aid to the MRCP PACES by Ryder/Mir is just a continuation of the 2nd edition of an aid to the MRCP short cases by Ryder/Mir(Which was aimed at the clinical part of old MRCP)and so does not fully conform to the new MRCP PACES EXam; the book covers only the clinical diagnosis of individual diseases without any discussion of their management and other relevant issues
I would highly recommend this book to any MRCP PACES candida, 11 Sep 2003
Ryder has provided many MRCP candidates to fall on with the first and second editions of his MRCP bible. It's clear and no-nonsense approach, right to the point analysis of a clinical problem has allowed candidates to crystalise their thoughts before presenting their final answers to examiners. Read through the pages to understand the magical impact of this book.
great book+great service, 07 Jun 2005
it is extrememely good and a must have book especially for mrcp students.....and this site is the bst place to buy it...superfast delivery and no hassle system....believe me first i ordered from another site and got stuck waiting for two weeks ultimately had to cancel order...but with amazon it was great....
The secret weapon for communication and history stations, 09 Mar 2004
A must have book for any candidate who is seriously preparing for the MRCP PACES .Also a life saver for someone who has a lack of time or enough UK experience to be comfortable with the system.
The discussion in both the history taking and ethics section is invaluable in daily medical practice. I wish I had this book much earlier!
Heavy going, 24 Apr 2007
Very heavy going but very good. Has more than you will need to know. Would also recommend Kalra.
All you never to ace your basic sciences, 19 Feb 2006
People say you need to restudy preclinical years studying of basic sciences. But hey, with this book, you don't touch any of them. It's got all the information you ever need for the your basic sciences. No need to study from other books to pass your part 1 whichever exams you take, mrcp, mrcpch,... you name it! I did it, so can you!
Excellent book, 05 Sep 2005
This is an excellent book for undergraduate revision and I would particularly recommend it to students on accelerated 4yr medical courses. This book covers the key preclinical themes that are covered at undergraduate level (although it misses pathology). The topics are covered in sufficient depth (although anatomy is more 'answers to key questions' rather than a sufficient guide in itself). It is well written and very good for exam revision. The reason I recommend it to medics on the 4yr course is that it is better as a memory refresher rather than as a first introduction to physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, etc.
Not beginner, not intermediate, not advanced, but AWESOME, 16 Aug 2004
This book is presented as a potted guide to basic sciences for the part 1 and that's exactly what it is. It provides the basic info so as to work out things from first principle. It is true what my mentor said, U read this book and thats all you need for basic science and pharm and part 1 is yours baby. Not beginner, not intermediate, not advanced, but AWESOME
This book fails to live up to expectations, 02 Dec 2001
Along with everyone else who sit the part 1 exam i bought this book. However it fails to provide the obscure facts required for the modern part 1....at least 5 years out of date!
Spend your well earned money on something else you will actually use!
Impressive, 22 Sep 2008
I am very impressed by this amazing book. It presents most of the acute medical cases in a detailed but clear format, supporting most, if not all, the answers with recent studies results and guidelines. Things that I couldn't find in classic text books and would take a lot of time to collect it from different resources of medical specialities.
The Data Interpretation Tutorials section is short but more than enough to actually feed the information into your brain.
Briefly, make sure to check this book out.
excellent for part 2, 17 Nov 2007
and for medicine in general. i found the echo explanations especially useful. however, its not fully adapted for the new style exams - there are still questions in it which ask you to give lists rather then choose best of five. think this needs changing by the next edition.
Excellent, 24 Apr 2007
Expensive but a standard revision book for MRCP. Make sure you check it out.
not so rapid, but superb quality and breadth, 19 Sep 2006
The 1st edition of this book was an instant best-seller. It comprised 150 short answer questions with detailed answers and stunning visuals.
The second edition has more than doubled in volume and most of the cases have been converted to the 'best of 5 format'.
Unfortunately the quality of the actual 'best of five' questions themselves does not really reflect the complexity of the real exam. Perhaps too many of the questions are 'barn door' cases which are most helpful for when starting out your part 2 revision joruney.
The questions are there more to facilitate the descriptions of the cases rather than test the reasoning power of the candidate.
This book differs significantly from other part 2 texts with its inclusion of many 'acute medicine' cases. I feel these are particularly helpful as they cover the standard acute medicine guidelines which are tested in the real exam.
Overall i found the book slightly laborious but it was still an imprtant part of my revision - and i passed!
Best book for the written component of the MRCP, 10 Jul 2000
I have taken this Part II Memebeship Exam three times and I have quite a lot of books for the written component. Not just to praise, defnitley it is the best book to revise for the exam in a short period of time.Hats off to the authors
|
|
|
 |
|
Clinical Skills for OSCEs
Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
*Best price found from Amazon Marketplace seller
|
*Amazon: £22.28
|
|
Customer Reviews
Excellent well rounded book, 26 Mar 2008
I much prefer this medical text to Kumar and Clark. IT is very logical and explains subjects well. The Best Bargain, 07 Nov 2007
After studying Harrison's principles of internal medicine throughout my final year i knew that it's not possible to review from it, So i decided to buy Davidson which i guess that it contains the largest amount of comprehensive informations in the smallest size possible.
The thing i loved in this book that it goes directly to the point which is important for answering the true&false type of questions.
The way this book explaining PATHOPHYSIOLOGY of diseases is brief, complete,updated, and i guess thats way a lot of people love this book.
The book is not useful for American students or countries following American guide line because of lot differences between the American and British medical systems which i have noticed after studying both books and this will make answer some of questions wrongly.
Problem with Davidson is the extensive use of tables which sometimes contain things not mentioned in the text and some of them are extremely rare for an undergraduate to know.
Chapters on CVS, Respiratory, Hematology, Rheumatology, DM, & HIV where very nice. Attitudes have changed, 22 Jan 2007
I can see a major change in peoples attitudes and expectations from any given book. I am sure a lot of senior doctors would agree with me that one cant learn everything from one book and the one who realises this early on in the profession goes long way. Brilliant, 21 Jan 2007
Davidson's is the best textbook of clinical medicine I have encountered. I own Kumar & Clarke as well but did not end up using it as much as i found it quite a boring read. It is detailed and structured but does not incite an interest in the subject like Davidson's does. The way information is presented in Davidson's also makes it easy to retain. And it has all the important information and the right emphasis on each topic. I also really like the EBM summaries presented in the little boxes found throughout the book. Wish I had found it earlier. Recommended for all medical students and practising doctors. I agree with the other reviewers- Davidson's is in my opinion a much better textbook than Kumar & Clarke, which I found very encyclopedic. not helpful for the MRCP, 06 Mar 2006
Having strayed away from this book for a couple of years since qualifying I returned to it whilst studying for the MRCP. Fortunately i quickly realized that the over edited text tends to miss out the slighty more idiosyncratic MRCP facts e.g i challenge you to find the pattern of motion wall movement on cardiac USS in HOCM - key information in the part 2. The lack of chapters on molecular medicine, immunology and statistics is also unhelpful. In the end i used question books and Kalra and easily passed the part 1. I find that the old adage is still true - read davidson's and you understand medicine; just don't expect it to distill important MRCP info for you. I hear the next edition is going to be more MRCP friendly. What you need to pass mrcp part 1, 19 Feb 2006
Took mrcp part 1 with less than 3mth experience in internal medicine. Aced it with just studying this book. Medicine posting is so busy, you just need to read this book & get the essense to pass. Not much clnical experience needed either. Get it and you won't regret it! a virtual entry requirement; concise but patchy, 06 Jan 2006
Like so many others before me i bought this book expecting great things. The hefty price tag alone seemed to be evidence of its brilliance (and the publishers caching in). The price clearly doesn't reflect the content or binding; compare davidson's. The book consists of a comprehensive list of system based chapters including the ones we all tend to neglect e.g. molecular medicine.
As i first approached chapters like cardiology i was shocked by the lack of substantive content. It put me off so much i let the book gather dust for several months, in favour of more traditional texts and MCQ books. Indeed many people say not to the bother with formal texts and just go for MCQs.
It is now 3 weeks before the exam and i'm realizing how useful the book is. Unfortunately many excellent books like Davidson's are just not MRCP friendly. In contrast this book is practical and readable given the busy timetable of working SHOs.
The chapters i once thought were brief now seem full of essential facts, and devoid of the interesting but MRCP-useless facts found in other texts.
There is a danger that a book like this could become mere lists but the chapter on endocrinology is an example of an excellent piece of science writing.
The chapters on molecular stuff and epidemiology are worth the price alone. There are many medical statistics books out there masquerading as concisely distilled information perfect for SHOs but in reality they are over the top for MRCP part 1. The major let down in the book is the infectious diseases chapters. This was a real chance for the book to shine but sadly essential diseases like leishmania are completely missed out. Overall its an important part of my revision shedule but not the dominant force, which remains every good MCQ book i can get my hands on. The third edition needs to be less patchy.
Cracking Read, 05 Jan 2006
First of all, I would recommend not sitting the exam. It is currently ruining my life. If you are masochistic enough to want to sit it, this book has all of the info you need. And my, what a lot of info.
an amazingly good book, 03 Sep 2003
This is a surprisingly good book for the MRCP I exams. It distils the most relevant facts in an easy to read format. If you are preparing for the MRCP I and you have little time (as most of us), you definitely need this book.
My suggestions for those preparing for the Part I:
1. Begin with the Color Atlas and Text of Clinical Medicine by Charles Forbes, et al. This book will gently introduce you to the whole of clinical medicine without taxing your brains.
2. Continue with the Essential Revision Notes for MRCP. Read it at least 2 or 3 times. It is only 660 pages, and shouldn't take that much time to read.
3. Begin practice questions, and ensure you practice MANY questions, checking up difficult cases from the reference books (e.g. Oxfords or Harisson's). A good source of questions is the onexamination.com
4. Round up your revision with the Essential Revision Notes, and
5. Confidently sit for the exams. Your chances of passing are well above 90%.
As in most exams, your success depends heavily on whether or not you read the relevant materials, and your familiarity with the types of questions set. The Essential Revision Notes for MRCP will take care of the former, and frequent practice will take care of the latter.
All you need to pass!, 03 Mar 2002
Well ok, this book and a lot of hard graft should see you pass. Big problem about the MRCP? Too much information and you haven't a clue where to start. This book gives you an idea of the level of study and knowledge the Royal College expects. Some useful lists and also reviews of those subjects you just glossed over at medical school and in a style easy enough for a surgeon to read! Seriously useful book. Used in conjunction with as many MCQs as you can get your hands on should give you a good chance.
BRILLIANT!, 11 Sep 2008
This book does exactly what it says on the tin, it is an absolute God Send, it demonstrates clear concepts to answer what can be difficult and confusing topics. It is well laid & thought out and covers a lot of important concepts beautifully, with great diagrams. A must have for the Primary!
A lifesaver!, 18 Mar 2008
I have been waiting for this book to come out for 6 mths! I am sitting my Final FRCA in the next 4 weeks and having been impressed by the drafts, the real thing reads very well and is even MORE IMPRESSIVE! I only recieved it 2 days ago but I can already say it has made life a lot easier and studying more focused to things that are important.
I wish I had a book like this during my Primary. I will definitely be recommending it to SHO/SpRs alike.
Two thumbs up to the authors - THANK YOU AND WELL DONE!
Not as good as Hall - buy it anyway because you need it for Paces, 03 Mar 2007
The problem with MRCP Paces is that there aren't that many books out there to read. The main texts are this book, the Tim Hall book and the Baliga book.
In my opinion the Hall text the two Ryder books. The Ryder books tend to jump from one topic to another, almost as though you are reading what came into Ryder's head next! The Hall book, by contrast treats each station comprehensively and in a logical format.
Baliga doesn't have many pictures (as noted in many of the reviews under that book) and is far more theoretical than either the Hall and Ryder books.
Ryder doesn't appear to give much emphasis to the communication and ethics stations - certainly not in as comprehensive a manner as Hall.
Having said all this, it's slightly unfair to compare the Hall book to Ryder and Baliga as Hall has the definite advantage of having been published later and so can respond to how the Paces exam has developed.
My advice is to buy all four books (this, the second Ryder book, Hall and Baliga). They all have different detailed examples in them and it's important that you get as wide a variety of examples before taking the Paces. As noted above, there aren't enough books out there currently for Paces candidates to pick and choose books.
Anyone want to write one?
This is the Ultimate Prep Book for PACES, 13 Dec 2004
An absolute essential book while preparing for the PACES.There is an intial introduction about systematic examination of various systems and then it plunges headlong into the most common possibilities under station 1,3,5.Its does not give diffrentails for every station but what it mentions on the 'findings delivery' bit is pure gold!."This exam is passes on how well you can sell your findings".The various anecdotes and experiences of past candidates are excellent and a great reminder of how unpredicatble this exam can be.whatever it is,it teaches you the correct things to say when faced with the typical exam patient[which is something you would otherwise bump into once in 2years!].Use it in conjuction with baliga and a good clinical course -it 'll make the exam easily passable.I did-and passed in the first attempt!.
An aid to the MRCP PACES, 19 Sep 2004
An aid to the MRCP PACES by Ryder/Mir is just a continuation of the 2nd edition of an aid to the MRCP short cases by Ryder/Mir(Which was aimed at the clinical part of old MRCP)and so does not fully conform to the new MRCP PACES EXam; the book covers only the clinical diagnosis of individual diseases without any discussion of their management and other relevant issues
I would highly recommend this book to any MRCP PACES candida, 11 Sep 2003
Ryder has provided many MRCP candidates to fall on with the first and second editions of his MRCP bible. It's clear and no-nonsense approach, right to the point analysis of a clinical problem has allowed candidates to crystalise their thoughts before presenting their final answers to examiners. Read through the pages to understand the magical impact of this book.
great book+great service, 07 Jun 2005
it is extrememely good and a must have book especially for mrcp students.....and this site is the bst place to buy it...superfast delivery and no hassle system....believe me first i ordered from another site and got stuck waiting for two weeks ultimately had to cancel order...but with amazon it was great....
The secret weapon for communication and history stations, 09 Mar 2004
A must have book for any candidate who is seriously preparing for the MRCP PACES .Also a life saver for someone who has a lack of time or enough UK experience to be comfortable with the system.
The discussion in both the history taking and ethics section is invaluable in daily medical practice. I wish I had this book much earlier!
Heavy going, 24 Apr 2007
Very heavy going but very good. Has more than you will need to know. Would also recommend Kalra.
All you never to ace your basic sciences, 19 Feb 2006
People say you need to restudy preclinical years studying of basic sciences. But hey, with this book, you don't touch any of them. It's got all the information you ever need for the your basic sciences. No need to study from other books to pass your part 1 whichever exams you take, mrcp, mrcpch,... you name it! I did it, so can you!
Excellent book, 05 Sep 2005
This is an excellent book for undergraduate revision and I would particularly recommend it to students on accelerated 4yr medical courses. This book covers the key preclinical themes that are covered at undergraduate level (although it misses pathology). The topics are covered in sufficient depth (although anatomy is more 'answers to key questions' rather than a sufficient guide in itself). It is well written and very good for exam revision. The reason I recommend it to medics on the 4yr course is that it is better as a memory refresher rather than as a first introduction to physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, etc.
Not beginner, not intermediate, not advanced, but AWESOME, 16 Aug 2004
This book is presented as a potted guide to basic sciences for the part 1 and that's exactly what it is. It provides the basic info so as to work out things from first principle. It is true what my mentor said, U read this book and thats all you need for basic science and pharm and part 1 is yours baby. Not beginner, not intermediate, not advanced, but AWESOME
This book fails to live up to expectations, 02 Dec 2001
Along with everyone else who sit the part 1 exam i bought this book. However it fails to provide the obscure facts required for the modern part 1....at least 5 years out of date!
Spend your well earned money on something else you will actually use!
Impressive, 22 Sep 2008
I am very impressed by this amazing book. It presents most of the acute medical cases in a detailed but clear format, supporting most, if not all, the answers with recent studies results and guidelines. Things that I couldn't find in classic text books and would take a lot of time to collect it from different resources of medical specialities.
The Data Interpretation Tutorials section is short but more than enough to actually feed the information into your brain.
Briefly, make sure to check this book out.
excellent for part 2, 17 Nov 2007
and for medicine in general. i found the echo explanations especially useful. however, its not fully adapted for the new style exams - there are still questions in it which ask you to give lists rather then choose best of five. think this needs changing by the next edition.
Excellent, 24 Apr 2007
Expensive but a standard revision book for MRCP. Make sure you check it out.
not so rapid, but superb quality and breadth, 19 Sep 2006
The 1st edition of this book was an instant best-seller. It comprised 150 short answer questions with detailed answers and stunning visuals.
The second edition has more than doubled in volume and most of the cases have been converted to the 'best of 5 format'.
Unfortunately the qual | | |