Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple

Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple


Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple

Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple


Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple


The role of the storyteller throughout history., 05 Jun 2001
From Florence to Lima to the Amazon this book intriguingly explores the role of the storyteller throughout history. One day in Florence a writer sees a photo of an old school friend , Saul standing amongst the Machiguenga tribe which lives in isolated dispersed groups throughout the amazon. For them the travelling storyteller is their newspaper, their internet, their historian, their entertainment, their library and their wise man. As the living collective memory of the tribe the storyteller reduces their sense of isolation by linking them to the outside world and in turn gives them identity and knowledge. For Saul this is his Kafkaesque metamorphosis into a whole new world . By exploring the Machiguenga's culture the author investigates the human mind as a whole and as the threads of the story become tightly woven a deep human need to tell stories is portrayed

This novel can be enjoyed on many levels as it reflects and investigates the parallel co-existence in Latin America of the ultra modern and ancient. As the author explains "At the heart of the same society there is a very modern civilisation that participates in all of the most modern technology and ideology and very primitive societies, archaic that are relatively frozen in time and maintain completely traditional structures, institutions and ideologies." As the aspect of globalisation is delved into we are also left with the tragedy of the inevitable destruction of so many rich and intricate cultures.

This short but powerful book with its magical, spell binding narration will by the end leave you re-assessing your own perceptions of society.

Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple


Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple


The role of the storyteller throughout history., 05 Jun 2001
From Florence to Lima to the Amazon this book intriguingly explores the role of the storyteller throughout history. One day in Florence a writer sees a photo of an old school friend , Saul standing amongst the Machiguenga tribe which lives in isolated dispersed groups throughout the amazon. For them the travelling storyteller is their newspaper, their internet, their historian, their entertainment, their library and their wise man. As the living collective memory of the tribe the storyteller reduces their sense of isolation by linking them to the outside world and in turn gives them identity and knowledge. For Saul this is his Kafkaesque metamorphosis into a whole new world . By exploring the Machiguenga's culture the author investigates the human mind as a whole and as the threads of the story become tightly woven a deep human need to tell stories is portrayed

This novel can be enjoyed on many levels as it reflects and investigates the parallel co-existence in Latin America of the ultra modern and ancient. As the author explains "At the heart of the same society there is a very modern civilisation that participates in all of the most modern technology and ideology and very primitive societies, archaic that are relatively frozen in time and maintain completely traditional structures, institutions and ideologies." As the aspect of globalisation is delved into we are also left with the tragedy of the inevitable destruction of so many rich and intricate cultures.

This short but powerful book with its magical, spell binding narration will by the end leave you re-assessing your own perceptions of society.

A flawless diamond, 13 Feb 2007
To date, this is probably the most brilliant book that I have read in any language. Conversation in the Cathedral is a true work of art, which requires both reader attention and patience, but is incredibly rewarding as the pieces begin to fall into place. Slow to begin, Conversation in the Cathedral drags one along with a seemingly random surface storyline before plunging one into the much deeper, darker undercurrents of family, social and political secrets. Cynical yet tender, complex yet simple, sporadic yet perfectly formed, Conversation in the Cathedral is truly unique.

An utmost acomplishment in literature, 25 Mar 2006
There are no flaws in this masterpiece, it's pure and wonderfull art you experience reading Peru's finest novel ever. Here you are faced with the absolute reality, the lifes and inner worlds of the caracters shown to you in a complete way, like a reunion of souls chatting directly to your spirit. My advice to read this one is: just to try and listen to them, after all this novel is about the "Mother of conversations". Try to feel like a person in a party, a funeral, or just a bar, listenig to what people say.

A Latin-American masterpiece, 21 Jul 2005
When one of the best contemporary Latin-American authors says "If I could only save from the one of the novels I have written, I would save this one", you know that the experience of reading this work has to be invaluable. In this novel, the author explores, through the use of some fictional characters, the effects of the dictatorship of Manuel A. Odria in Peru. One of the aspects that shocked me and that I still find surprising is how well the impact of these terrible events translates to other dictatorships that occurred later in the Latin American history.

Vargas Llosa uses a very difficult style throughout this novel, since he jumps back and forth through time and space, and also changes continuously among the viewpoint of different characters, without warning the reader about what is going on in each case. It does take some getting used to in order to fully enjoy the novel, but once you achieve this, the rewards are abundant and leave us satisfied. In this regard, it may help to read "The Time of the Hero" first, since in this book the author uses a similar technique, but keeping it a little simpler.

I have heard some of my friends and family complain about Vargas Llosa's style in this work, saying that the author is just trying to be fancy with his writing when there is no need for it. I do not agree with this; I think that the point the author is trying to make through his convoluted technique has to do with the frustration that people feel during a dictatorship and he wants you to feel some of it too when you are going through the experience of reading about it. But also, the author knows that you are going to have to give the book your full attention if you want to understand it, so his style helps assure that you will grasp his point.

In my opinion, there is only one other book that can compete with this one for the best Latin-American novel of all times, and most people can probably figure out pretty quickly that I am referring to "One Hundred Years of Solitude". I am not sure which one comes on top, but I know for sure that I would not want to have to make a choice in terms of which of the two to save from the fire!

A fantastic book, 17 Jun 2004
It took me almost ten years to read this book - I bought it in 1993, tried to understand it and then restarted it in 2002 - but it was worth persisting with.
The narrative can be difficult to follow - it weaves in and out of the past (1940s) and present (late 1950s) without explanation as it attempts to explain why Peruvian society is so crippled by corruption. And the shocking conclusion of the book jars with a modern day liberal view of the world (though I have no doubt it would have been truly shocking in the 1950s).
The book is a marvel though - and while it is currently difficult to obtain in English I would heartily recommend it to anyone with an interest in politics and history.

Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple


Do you want to be bad?, 02 Sep 2008
Curiously gripping, poignant and soulful. This book entertained but also challenged my thinking on permanence. One loves, the other is loved. One loses the other chooses when to be found. One is, the other creates personae.

Some good bad girl's bits too.

I found this easy to read but beautifully written, a good story, but with plenty to reflect on. I recommend it.

Weakest offering yet., 02 Sep 2008
For me, this is definitely Vargas Llosa's weakest offering yet. Although entertaining enough, and written with his undeniable skill and style, this latest novel is well short of Vargas Llosa's normal high standards.
Essentially this novel is a story following the inextricably linked lives of the 2 main characters, across various continents and decades. Disappointingly, however, the underlying theme of the novel seems to be the author's desire to demonstrate his knowledge of all the countries in which he himself has lived over the various decades, rather than having any great story to tell. The story itself is threadbare, a poor man's Love in the Time of Cholera, and is essentially a ridiculous sequence of coincidental meetings between the writer and the nina mala. The novel crescendos to a farcical level, when the protagonist has a chance meeting with the nina's father in Peru.
Normally so insightful and probing, Vargas Llosa spends little time or care in examining or describing characters outside of the central plot.
Once I have overcome my disappointment, I will re-read some of his other works, so as not to leave a bitter taste in my mouth.

Worth reading but nowhere near his best, 15 May 2008
I keep changing my mind about this book - I can't decide if it is a good book that narrowly misses being very good, or an average book that narrowly misses being quite bad.

I've been reading Vargas Llosa for over twenty years - this is the eleventh of his books that I've read. In terms of style this is the most conventional of those eleven - had it not had his name on the front I wouldn't have recognized it as his - gone are the multiple narratives and dazzling, non-sequential time shifts. I miss them. They made novels like The Green House and The Storyteller hard but rewarding reads. This book was hard work at times as well but not for the same reasons. Deliberately "bad" writing is a dangerous device and Vargas Llosa overuses it here. At least I'm assuming that it is deliberately bad, because some of it is so facile that a writer of Vargas Llosa's quality and a translator of Edith Grossman's experience couldn't have up with some of the dross that is served up, (particularly in the early parts of the book, to link the periods when the "bad girl" appears) without deliberation. The description of "swinging London" is so bad that it sounds like it was written by a fourteen year-old - although even the squarest 14 year-old is unlikely to have come up with a list of London "trend setters" that includes Cliff Richard. This is presumably done for effect, to bring the novel to life when the Bad Girl appears but is also asks the reader to put up with a lot that they wouldn't tolerate from an unknown author.

Some people have said that they find the character of the Bad Girl either unbelievable or so unappealing that it is hard to persevere with the novel - or to understand what the narrator sees in her. I disagree - I've known a few women like the Bad Girl and can quite understand the narrator's obsession. However, your reaction may depend upon what you feel an author's representation of an individual suggests about their opinion of a group. It would be possible to write a feminist interpretation of this novel suggesting that the author's depiction of a strong, sexually independent woman being physically and mentally destroyed as a result of this independence is simple male wish fulfilment - the desire to destroy something which is both desirable and terrifying (add the fact that they first time the couple make love he is "too big" for her and that in his sixties he has a relationship with a much younger woman and the case for this being a novel of male wish-fulfilment looks increasingly strong!). Couple this with the fact that the only gay character dies of AIDS and you could make a convincing case that his was a very conservative and reactionary novel. I don't think it is, but one could make a case that way.

Is it all bad? No. Personally I found the Bad Girl an fascinating character and the relationship believable. Also, as an expat myself, I found Vargas Llosa's description of the narrator's dislocation from both his homeland and his adopted home very real. It is possible to read the novel as an allegory of a writer's career, as N. Megahey's says, although it is interesting that I've never seen Varags Llosa say this in any interviews about the book. If so, it is a bit heavy handed - I prefer to read it as a love story and a fable about the dangers of always wanting something more, something unatainable, something better than we have.

In short - I really wanted to love this book, as I have most of Vargas Llosa's work. I didn't - I enjoyed it, but doubt that I will read it again. I almost gave it four stars out of loyalty and affection for the author's previous work - but to be honest, if this had been the first of his novels that I'd read I probably wouldn't have bothered to pick up his earlier work.


The writer's curse, 13 Feb 2008
In its passion for love, life and writing, Mario Vargas Llosa's latest novel returns brilliantly to the inspirations of one of his best novels 'Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter'. In 'The Bad Girl', an idealistic young man leaves Miraflores in Peru with no greater ambition than to spend the rest of his years living in the most beautiful city in the world, Paris. He is content to be nothing more than a humble translator and interpreter as long as it allows him to remain there, but a mysterious beautiful woman from his past turns up unexpectedly, and his life never again knows a moment's peace. Despite the torments she puts him through over the subsequent decades, he is continually unable to resist her charms.

There is little doubt that the desirable but uncontrollable 'bad girl' is nothing more than Ricardo's muse, the vital impulse to interact with life and write about it - each of her appearances coinciding with a new decade and new stage in the opening up of narrator's life. Even when the author is describing the most passionate of love scenes with the irresistible 'bad girl', you suspect that the only banging going on in all those hotel rooms and Parisian garrets is on a typewriter.

It sounds like a clever conceit, and anyone failing to catch the subtle literary subtext will undoubtedly struggle to get past the apparent coincidences of Ricardo's encounters, or the superficial treatment of the political content, but Vargas Llosa makes it all completely relevant and meaningful through his passionate and brilliant writing. 'The Bad Girl' is a dazzling, entertaining and deeply poignant work that, whether you are a writer or not, sums up the need to wholeheartedly embrace life, to make the most of the friendships that come your way, accepting all the joys and the heartaches that enrich the experience.

"You're my praying mantis... The female insect devours the male while he's making love to her. He dies happy, apparently.", 25 Oct 2007
(4.5 stars) In 1950, when Ricardo Somocurcio first meets Lily, a "Chilean" exotic in Lima, Peru, he is fifteen, sure of only one thing--that she is the most bewitching creature he has ever known. His young infatuation eventually develops into a lifelong obsession, and his story of how Lily dominates all aspects of his romantic life for more than forty years shows both the mysterious power of unconditional love and the peril of misplaced devotion. Lily is a will-o'-the-wisp, appearing and vanishing, changing names, following the lure of power to revolutionary Cuba, the lure of wealth to Paris, and eventually the lure of both power and wealth to Japan, where her lover is a high ranking yakuza sadist. Somehow, however, she always makes her way back to Ricardo, whom she professes not to love, despite, or perhaps because of, his unquestioned acceptance of her humiliations of him.

From Lima to Paris, London, and Madrid, the story of the "bad girl" and the "good boy" unfolds, exploring all aspects of love and betrayal within the changing settings and political climates of the various countries in which the two have commitments. Whether it be revolutionary Cuba, to which Lily goes as Comrade Arlette; the Tupac Amaru guerilla movement in Peru, where some of Ricardo's friends battle the government; the French revolutionary movement which brought about the downfall of Charles DeGaulle; or the various United Nations conferences in the 1970s and 1980s, which Ricardo attends as a UNESCO translator, love, politics, and violence exist side by side.

Though author Mario Vargas Llosa bases the plot of his book on novels by Flaubert (Madame Bovary and A Sentimental Education), he makes Lily an individual--a femme fatale who forever drops in and then out of Ricardo's life--and any parallels with the Flaubert novels remain in the background.Lily, or whatever name she uses when she bursts in on his life, is a product of her times, a woman whose sexual freedom allows her to pursue whatever pleases her, whether that means having an affair with a Cuban leader or engaging in kinky sex with a Japanese gangster. She has no qualms about using Ricardo to solve problems when she is desperate--and then moving on, disappearing unexpectedly and leaving him bereft--as usual. His constant acceptance of her behavior may make him a problematic protagonist for some readers.

Vargas Llosa, whose fascination with politics permeates many of his novels, broadens the perspective of this novel beyond that of a love story by tying many of the characters' experiences to revolutionary politics, paying particular attention to Peruvian strongmen from 1960 to 1990. Drawing loose parallels between the bad girl, who represents Ricardo's constantly dashed (and always revitalized) hopes, and political candidates who promise the world and fail to deliver, he sets scenes and brings his characters to life in intense, vibrant prose. Though Vargas Llosa focuses on two people, the bad girl and the good boy, he creates a world around them that is so fully realized that their lives take on symbolic significance: the praying mantis has many parallels in life, love, and politics. Mary Whipple


The role of the storyteller throughout history., 05 Jun 2001
From Florence to Lima to the Amazon this book intriguingly explores the role of the storyteller throughout history. One day in Florence a writer sees a photo of an old school friend , Saul standing amongst the Machiguenga tribe which lives in isolated dispersed groups throughout the amazon. For them the travelling storyteller is their newspaper, their internet, their historian, their entertainment, their library and their wise man. As the living collective memory of the tribe the storyteller reduces their sense of isolation by linking them to the outside world and in turn gives them identity and knowledge. For Saul this is his Kafkaesque metamorphosis into a whole new world . By exploring the Machiguenga's culture the author investigates the human mind as a whole and as the thre