Excellent in principle but now, sadly, out of date, 01 Nov 2005
The EU is a very complex organisation and Pinder provides a clear, structured description, starting with the historical background of the EU's predecessor organisations, moving through its structure and institutions through to key issues such as budget and CAP, and social policy.

His explanation of the difference between a federal approach and inter-governmentalism is particularly interesting to Brits, and he makes the UK's position and actions (and those of others) clear in context.

The principles underlying the EU's creation, development and functioning are clearly explained.

My major criticism, though, is that so much has happened to the EU since the book's publication - the launch of the Euro and the accession of ten further countries in May 2004. These are prospects in the book - what we need is an up-to-date version which describes the impact of these important changes.

Charts of numbers of MEPs (and similar data) by country are of no more than historical interest when they're based on fifteen members. An updated version would get five stars from me.

Unclear and unfocused, 14 Feb 2003
I picked up this book to try and clear some of the confusion that surrounds the EU. Quite simply I wanted to understand what it was all about. As part of the 'Short Guide' series, the aim is to present topics in an accessible and clear way. What better subject than the EU for this series which despite having such a profound impact on our lives, few truly understand. Unfortunately, I was bitterly disappointed. From the word go, the author makes assumptions and far from presenting the topic in a clear and accessible way - he confuses and almost assumes those reading it are elected EU parliamentarians. I was crying out for a definition of some of the jargon in simple, clear english. What is qualified majority voting for example? If your aim is to give an understanding, you can't assume knowledge and just launch into the first chapter bandying it around. In fact, reading this book is similar to reading a dry contract.

Excellent - a stylish and well-presented introduction., 25 Jun 2001
This is a superbly written précis - ideal for those with only a basic understanding of the complexities of the European Union - and an excellent springboard to more thorough books on the subject. The author is knowledgeable and opinionated, but generally able to present his work in an unbiased manner, without overburdening the reader with technical details about the various institutions.

For such a short book, it is remarkably comprehensive, including political, economic, legal and historical observations. I particularly enjoyed the presentation of the EU's history, with its emphasis on the characters that have been involved in the development of the EU. Pinder's views on Britain's role are obvious - he is a fervent Europhile - but he is also quick to point out the shortcomings of badly conceived or poorly executed policies in which Britain has played no part.

Given the current political climate, it was a pleasure to read a pro-European book written with authority and style. A far cry from the emotive rhetoric that pervaded the recent election campaign. This is compulsory reading for us all before the promised referendum on Europe.

Excellent in principle but now, sadly, out of date, 01 Nov 2005
The EU is a very complex organisation and Pinder provides a clear, structured description, starting with the historical background of the EU's predecessor organisations, moving through its structure and institutions through to key issues such as budget and CAP, and social policy.

His explanation of the difference between a federal approach and inter-governmentalism is particularly interesting to Brits, and he makes the UK's position and actions (and those of others) clear in context.

The principles underlying the EU's creation, development and functioning are clearly explained.

My major criticism, though, is that so much has happened to the EU since the book's publication - the launch of the Euro and the accession of ten further countries in May 2004. These are prospects in the book - what we need is an up-to-date version which describes the impact of these important changes.

Charts of numbers of MEPs (and similar data) by country are of no more than historical interest when they're based on fifteen members. An updated version would get five stars from me.

Unclear and unfocused, 14 Feb 2003
I picked up this book to try and clear some of the confusion that surrounds the EU. Quite simply I wanted to understand what it was all about. As part of the 'Short Guide' series, the aim is to present topics in an accessible and clear way. What better subject than the EU for this series which despite having such a profound impact on our lives, few truly understand. Unfortunately, I was bitterly disappointed. From the word go, the author makes assumptions and far from presenting the topic in a clear and accessible way - he confuses and almost assumes those reading it are elected EU parliamentarians. I was crying out for a definition of some of the jargon in simple, clear english. What is qualified majority voting for example? If your aim is to give an understanding, you can't assume knowledge and just launch into the first chapter bandying it around. In fact, reading this book is similar to reading a dry contract.

Excellent - a stylish and well-presented introduction., 25 Jun 2001
This is a superbly written précis - ideal for those with only a basic understanding of the complexities of the European Union - and an excellent springboard to more thorough books on the subject. The author is knowledgeable and opinionated, but generally able to present his work in an unbiased manner, without overburdening the reader with technical details about the various institutions.

For such a short book, it is remarkably comprehensive, including political, economic, legal and historical observations. I particularly enjoyed the presentation of the EU's history, with its emphasis on the characters that have been involved in the development of the EU. Pinder's views on Britain's role are obvious - he is a fervent Europhile - but he is also quick to point out the shortcomings of badly conceived or poorly executed policies in which Britain has played no part.

Given the current political climate, it was a pleasure to read a pro-European book written with authority and style. A far cry from the emotive rhetoric that pervaded the recent election campaign. This is compulsory reading for us all before the promised referendum on Europe.

Don't be misled by the simplicity, 08 Oct 2007
I sometimes like this shorter books but not this one. At first I thought that it was the best thing that had ever happened to me in my inability to get to grips with EU law but all the things that I thought I understood I later found that I didn't really because they were all explained in far too simplistic terms. You know there is a difference between simplifying complicated ideas so that you present them in easy to understand terms (which is a good thing if it is done well) and giving the appearance of simplifying things by leaving out all the tricky bits (which is a very very bad thing as it is really misleading). This book gave me a really false sense that I understood the topic but you try taking what this book tells you and writing an essay on the basis of it and you will find that it just doesn't work. It is a bit like trying to understand why a plane stays in the air. If someone tells you that it is because of the design of the wings and to do with air pressure than you can grasp that because it is a very simple explanation but it does not mean that you understand aerodynamic theory. This is exactly what this book does - it feeds you simple statements so that you think that you understand something but it is so over simplified that you understand virtually nothing and that is dangerous

Excellent companion to EU case law, 06 Feb 2002
Brilliant book,explains cases briefly in a no-nonsense way, picks up most vital aspects of cases and avoids all useless arguments.

Excellent in principle but now, sadly, out of date, 01 Nov 2005
The EU is a very complex organisation and Pinder provides a clear, structured description, starting with the historical background of the EU's predecessor organisations, moving through its structure and institutions through to key issues such as budget and CAP, and social policy.

His explanation of the difference between a federal approach and inter-governmentalism is particularly interesting to Brits, and he makes the UK's position and actions (and those of others) clear in context.

The principles underlying the EU's creation, development and functioning are clearly explained.

My major criticism, though, is that so much has happened to the EU since the book's publication - the launch of the Euro and the accession of ten further countries in May 2004. These are prospects in the book - what we need is an up-to-date version which describes the impact of these important changes.

Charts of numbers of MEPs (and similar data) by country are of no more than historical interest when they're based on fifteen members. An updated version would get five stars from me.

Unclear and unfocused, 14 Feb 2003
I picked up this book to try and clear some of the confusion that surrounds the EU. Quite simply I wanted to understand what it was all about. As part of the 'Short Guide' series, the aim is to present topics in an accessible and clear way. What better subject than the EU for this series which despite having such a profound impact on our lives, few truly understand. Unfortunately, I was bitterly disappointed. From the word go, the author makes assumptions and far from presenting the topic in a clear and accessible way - he confuses and almost assumes those reading it are elected EU parliamentarians. I was crying out for a definition of some of the jargon in simple, clear english. What is qualified majority voting for example? If your aim is to give an understanding, you can't assume knowledge and just launch into the first chapter bandying it around. In fact, reading this book is similar to reading a dry contract.

Excellent - a stylish and well-presented introduction., 25 Jun 2001
This is a superbly written précis - ideal for those with only a basic understanding of the complexities of the European Union - and an excellent springboard to more thorough books on the subject. The author is knowledgeable and opinionated, but generally able to present his work in an unbiased manner, without overburdening the reader with technical details about the various institutions.

For such a short book, it is remarkably comprehensive, including political, economic, legal and historical observations. I particularly enjoyed the presentation of the EU's history, with its emphasis on the characters that have been involved in the development of the EU. Pinder's views on Britain's role are obvious - he is a fervent Europhile - but he is also quick to point out the shortcomings of badly conceived or poorly executed policies in which Britain has played no part.

Given the current political climate, it was a pleasure to read a pro-European book written with authority and style. A far cry from the emotive rhetoric that pervaded the recent election campaign. This is compulsory reading for us all before the promised referendum on Europe.

Don't be misled by the simplicity, 08 Oct 2007
I sometimes like this shorter books but not this one. At first I thought that it was the best thing that had ever happened to me in my inability to get to grips with EU law but all the things that I thought I understood I later found that I didn't really because they were all explained in far too simplistic terms. You know there is a difference between simplifying complicated ideas so that you present them in easy to understand terms (which is a good thing if it is done well) and giving the appearance of simplifying things by leaving out all the tricky bits (which is a very very bad thing as it is really misleading). This book gave me a really false sense that I understood the topic but you try taking what this book tells you and writing an essay on the basis of it and you will find that it just doesn't work. It is a bit like trying to understand why a plane stays in the air. If someone tells you that it is because of the design of the wings and to do with air pressure than you can grasp that because it is a very simple explanation but it does not mean that you understand aerodynamic theory. This is exactly what this book does - it feeds you simple statements so that you think that you understand something but it is so over simplified that you understand virtually nothing and that is dangerous

Excellent companion to EU case law, 06 Feb 2002
Brilliant book,explains cases briefly in a no-nonsense way, picks up most vital aspects of cases and avoids all useless arguments.

Excellent Book!, 19 Oct 2007
I'm now in my second year of an undergraduate course and my lecturers had recommended two main books - this one and another EU Law textbook by Jo.Steiner. I first bought the EU book by Jo.Steiner but realised that it had no caselaw (or insufficient at least) and decided to get this book by Burca. I have to say that you can rely on this book alone for the full course, it is very informative and has some interesting small debates on contentious issues. Quite rightly, it can be described as the 'Bible' of EU Law. Despite it being very thick with lots of information, it is very easy to read and comprehend.

In summary, get this book before any others! You would not need to buy any others, but remember always use other books as well for essays!

Why is it so long winded?, 08 Oct 2007
This book is massively over-detailed. Even my lecturer who suggested this book as recommended reading says on her handout 'It has far more detail than you will need on this course but there are nuggets of crucial information amongst all the detail'. Is there really? Well why can't people who are supposed to be such experts in their field that they write what is described as the leading textbooks get to the point a bit more quickly or better still make it clear which bits of their lengthy boredom-fest are the important bits that students need to know. I bought this, read the first reading from it that I had to read for a seminar and sent it back so that I could get a refund. There are tons of good, clear and to the point EU law textbooks out there that are for sale at a fraction of the price of this rambling mammoth so be sure to shop around for a book that is actualy useful (cuts through the chaff for you) rather than making things even more muddled.

Best EU Law book around, 18 Sep 2007
As a law student I've had to shell out loads of money for books that stay on the shelf and barely get opened... after five years of law school I can say without a shadow of a doubt Craig and De Burca was the book I got the most value for money out of. Absolutely, 100% recommended for any law student who will be taking a number of EU courses, or EU Law related degree. If only all other law books were as easy to read as this one!

Claptrap, 19 Jul 2007
This book is totally woeful - it completely misdescribes the crucial principle of indirect effect and is breathtakingly incompetent when discussing the Von Colson principle.

I urge all self-respecting students of the law to steer well clear of this depressing read, it will seriously challenge your will to live.

EU Law textbook review, 27 Jun 2006
Suddenly EU law becomes clear! If, like me, you have struggled to master the various areas and concepts of EU law then this book is for you. Easy to use, easy to read and easy to cross reference to other text books. Well worth the money!

Excellent in principle but now, sadly, out of date, 01 Nov 2005
The EU is a very complex organisation and Pinder provides a clear, structured description, starting with the historical background of the EU's predecessor organisations, moving through its structure and institutions through to key issues such as budget and CAP, and social policy.

His explanation of the difference between a federal approach and inter-governmentalism is particularly interesting to Brits, and he makes the UK's position and actions (and those of others) clear in context.

The principles underlying the EU's creation, development and functioning are clearly explained.

My major criticism, though, is that so much has happened to the EU since the book's publication - the launch of the Euro and the accession of ten further countries in May 2004. These are prospects in the book - what we need is an up-to-date version which describes the impact of these important changes.

Charts of numbers of MEPs (and similar data) by country are of no more than historical interest when they're based on fifteen members. An updated version would get five stars from me.

Unclear and unfocused, 14 Feb 2003
I picked up this book to try and clear some of the confusion that surrounds the EU. Quite simply I wanted to understand what it was all about. As part of the 'Short Guide' series, the aim is to present topics in an accessible and clear way. What better subject than the EU for this series which despite having such a profound impact on our lives, few truly understand. Unfortunately, I was bitterly disappointed. From the word go, the author makes assumptions and far from presenting the topic in a clear and accessible way - he confuses and almost assumes those reading it are elected EU parliamentarians. I was crying out for a definition of some of the jargon in simple, clear english. What is qualified majority voting for example? If your aim is to give an understanding, you can't assume knowledge and just launch into the first chapter bandying it around. In fact, reading this book is similar to reading a dry contract.

Excellent - a stylish and well-presented introduction., 25 Jun 2001
This is a superbly written précis - ideal for those with only a basic understanding of the complexities of the European Union - and an excellent springboard to more thorough books on the subject. The author is knowledgeable and opinionated, but generally able to present his work in an unbiased manner, without overburdening the reader with technical details about the various institutions.

For such a short book, it is remarkably comprehensive, including political, economic, legal and historical observations. I particularly enjoyed the presentation of the EU's history, with its emphasis on the characters that have been involved in the development of the EU. Pinder's views on Britain's role are obvious - he is a fervent Europhile - but he is also quick to point out the shortcomings of badly conceived or poorly executed policies in which Britain has played no part.

Given the current political climate, it was a pleasure to read a pro-European book written with authority and style. A far cry from the emotive rhetoric that pervaded the recent election campaign. This is compulsory reading for us all before the promised referendum on Europe.

Don't be misled by the simplicity, 08 Oct 2007
I sometimes like this shorter books but not this one. At first I thought that it was the best thing that had ever happened to me in my inability to get to grips with EU law but all the things that I thought I understood I later found that I didn't really because they were all explained in far too simplistic terms. You know there is a difference between simplifying complicated ideas so that you present them in easy to understand terms (which is a good thing if it is done well) and giving the appearance of simplifying things by leaving out all the tricky bits (which is a very very bad thing as it is really misleading). This book gave me a really false sense that I understood the topic but you try taking what this book tells you and writing an essay on the basis of it and you will find that it just doesn't work. It is a bit like trying to understand why a plane stays in the air. If someone tells you that it is because of the design of the wings and to do with air pressure than you can grasp that because it is a very simple explanation but it does not mean that you understand aerodynamic theory. This is exactly what this book does - it feeds you simple statements so that you think that you understand something but it is so over simplified that you understand virtually nothing and that is dangerous

Excellent companion to EU case law, 06 Feb 2002
Brilliant book,explains cases briefly in a no-nonsense way, picks up most vital aspects of cases and avoids all useless arguments.

Excellent Book!, 19 Oct 2007
I'm now in my second year of an undergraduate course and my lecturers had recommended two main books - this one and another EU Law textbook by Jo.Steiner. I first bought the EU book by Jo.Steiner but realised that it had no caselaw (or insufficient at least) and decided to get this book by Burca. I have to say that you can rely on this book alone for the full course, it is very informative and has some interesting small debates on contentious issues. Quite rightly, it can be described as the 'Bible' of EU Law. Despite it being very thick with lots of information, it is very easy to read and comprehend.

In summary, get this book before any others! You would not need to buy any others, but remember always use other books as well for essays!

Why is it so long winded?, 08 Oct 2007
This book is massively over-detailed. Even my lecturer who suggested this book as recommended reading says on her handout 'It has far more detail than you will need on this course but there are nuggets of crucial information amongst all the detail'. Is there really? Well why can't people who are supposed to be such experts in their field that they write what is described as the leading textbooks get to the point a bit more quickly or better still make it clear which bits of their lengthy boredom-fest are the important bits that students need to know. I bought this, read the first reading from it that I had to read for a seminar and sent it back so that I could get a refund. There are tons of good, clear and to the point EU law textbooks out there that are for sale at a fraction of the price of this rambling mammoth so be sure to shop around for a book that is actualy useful (cuts through the chaff for you) rather than making things even more muddled.

Best EU Law book around, 18 Sep 2007
As a law student I've had to shell out loads of money for books that stay on the shelf and barely get opened... after five years of law school I can say without a shadow of a doubt Craig and De Burca was the book I got the most value for money out of. Absolutely, 100% recommended for any law student who will be taking a number of EU courses, or EU Law related degree. If only all other law books were as easy to read as this one!

Claptrap, 19 Jul 2007
This book is totally woeful - it completely misdescribes the crucial principle of indirect effect and is breathtakingly incompetent when discussing the Von Colson principle.

I urge all self-respecting students of the law to steer well clear of this depressing read, it will seriously challenge your will to live.

EU Law textbook review, 27 Jun 2006
Suddenly EU law becomes clear! If, like me, you have struggled to master the various areas and concepts of EU law then this book is for you. Easy to use, easy to read and easy to cross reference to other text books. Well worth the money!

An invaluable contribution to British politics., 16 Sep 2008
I began reading this book knowing relatively little about the EU's history and purpose. By the time I had finished it however, I felt like I had gained a perfect (and frightening) understanding of the Union's true nature. This is not a project based on pragmatism and open-mindedness, but one fuelled by ruthless ideological determination.

Anyone who wishes to obtain an understanding of the European Union should read this fascinating book.

Useful reading., 31 Dec 2007
This is a well written book and takes the reader in a methodical and chronological order through the promises, deceptions and outcomes of the European project from its inception, to the current floundering status of today's EU.

Britain has done well out of the EU from the perspective of its London-centric capital market and the availability of cheap, eastern European labour to circumvent the folly of the minimum wage. Britain's agriculture and fishing industries have met with a great deal of trauma in comparison to others, but we can be very thnakful that, unlike others, we are not held hostage to agriculture, as France and Germany so clearly are.

The bulk of Britain's travails derive from the lunacy that is part and parcel of the British mania for mindless bureaucracy, which is the bane of enterprise and prosperity, and not directly a result of Brussels as France and most other EU memeber-states can attest to. Furthermore, whether intergovernmental or supranatioal, the politicians of consequence--but not necessarily any virtue--can manage with either. Name any who have suffered in any way, post-government?

The real problem with the EU including its member-states, is that democracy and the subsequent government is insufficiently restricted in its scope so that government cannot do the harm it currently can, politically or economically.

As Christopher Booker has pointed out in the final chapter, those who set out to deceive end up deceiving themselves. To that end, reality-economics will sweep away the EU dream as it is currently envisaged by our continental counterparts. This is simply because western Europe is essentially bankrupt, and China and India for example, will not be impeding their own development by way of non-existent environmental concerns, to fend off the evil day.

Readers of this title might wish to read: 'Democrcay, The God That failed' by Hans Herman Hoppe. Which applies equally well to supranationalism or intergovernmentalism.


Well-written, informative history, 21 Oct 2007
Throughout this book there's a great sense that the authors set upon a task to hack through the myriad of spin and complexities of the European Union to set the record straight. And whilst that does lead to a partisan reading regarding some of the characters involved, it should not distract from what is a meticulous and forensic insight into the dynamic of this organization.

Drawing upon de-classified government papers, memoirs and other sources, the history of the organization is crafted in splendid detail, weaving the many architects and actors of this story into a compelling read. In particular, it challenges some of the conventional norms that have rendered the debate in Britain chronically mis-informed and dormant. As such, it might be considered a polemic, but I find some of the dismissals of the text as "conspiracy theories" unfair given the plentiful and rigorous supporting evidence.

Overall a well-written, enjoyable book that brings a very dry subject to life.


Informative history through the eyes of conspiracy theorists, 28 Jul 2007
I can only reaffirm some of the earlier reviews which state that this is a well written, enjoyable account of the history of European integration; however it is spoiled by some rather baffling conclusions concerning hidden agendas, conspiracy theories and downright biased analysis. It's never given a full and detailed airing, but at its heart this book attempts to argue that some clique of Europhile plotters is attempting to hijack European democracies and force European citizens into a giant superstate against their will. The fact that the European Union is not a superstate and cannot feasibly become one in the near future is ignored. The idea that national governments would voluntarily involve themselves in the limited integration which has manifested itself or (heaven forbid) that it's actually in their interests to do so, is written off as either stupidity - Heath didn't know what he was doing - or as some sinister cloak and dagger plot - Heath was actually a secret Europhile mole who infiltrated the government. None of this is credible. Governments involve themselves in the process because they believe it's in their interests to do so, virtually no European government since the 1970's has advocated the creation of a superstate and they are the only actors who can create such a thing.

In short, the authors do an admirable account of describing events in the past, but their analysis and predictions of the future border on the nutty. If you must read this book (and there are other well written histories out there which don't have the political baggage) then do so with more than a pinch of salt.

The most important book on the truth of about the EU ever, 08 May 2007
Before you buy this book you need to ask yourself two questions. Firstly, am I opposed to the EU or at very least very suspicious of it? Secondly, am I very interested in politics? Finally, are you a fan of "deep" reading and not casual reading? If the answer to all of these is yes, then you will greatly enjoy this book. If not, then you will find it hard to get into, let alone finish.

The most striking feature of the book is its exquisite, almost forensic detail. Everything from what was served for dinner at EU meetings to the details of EU treaties are examined, and meticulously referenced, adding a real professional "feel" to this book that one would expect from such an academic endeavour. This instantly gives it a feel of genuine credibility and power so lacking in most books on the matter that tend to veer of either into propagandistic rave reviews or angry rants, dependent upon the attitude to the EU held by the writer. This remarkably well tempered, if hardly neutral account, is extremely refreshing.

One great strength of this book is its careful analysis of the individuals in the EU "project". From its shadowy architect Jean Monnet, right through to its British cheerleaders Ted Heath and Tony Blair, the power of individuals politicians to develop the EU is examined in great depth. Another great strength is its analysis of how the EU has "packaged" itself to try and gain public acquiescence and support for its agenda at various stages in "the project". For example, warning Britain that it would feel "left out" in the 1970s, and warning us that we were headed for a "two speed" Europe in the 1990s unless we complied with their ever expanding list of demands and directives.

The book does have its weaknesses. Firstly, some chapters can feel a little repetitive, especially chapters dealing with EU summits, all of which basically seem to turn out the same, bar a few minor details and this can be a little tiring at times. Another weakness is that whilst the book is very long on diagnosis about the EU, it is very short (in fact barely existent) on cure i.e. what needs to be done about the EU. Given the authors exquisite knowledge of the subject matter, one would have found it interesting to hear their opinions on the subject.

In conclusion, I can honestly say that this book was a genuine eye opener, and I say this as someone who prior to reading it considered myself very well informed about the EU's true nature. However this book has taught me so much more, and I would strongly urge all other serious students of the EU/Eurospecticism to study this book. Forewarned, is forearmed.

Excellent in principle but now, sadly, out of date, 01 Nov 2005
The EU is a very complex organisation and Pinder provides a clear, structured description, starting with the historical background of the EU's predecessor organisations, moving through its structure and institutions through to key issues such as budget and CAP, and social policy.

His explanation of the difference between a federal approach and inter-governmentalism is particularly interesting to Brits, and he makes the UK's position and actions (and those of others) clear in context.

The principles underlying the EU's creation, development and functioning are clearly explained.

My major criticism, though, is that so much has happened to the EU since the book's publication - the launch of the Euro and the accession of ten further countries in May 2004. These are prospects in the book - what we need is an up-to-date version which describes the impact of these important changes.

Charts of numbers of MEPs (and similar data) by country are of no more than historical interest when they're based on fifteen members. An updated version would get five stars from me.

Unclear and unfocused, 14 Feb 2003
I picked up this book to try and clear some of the confusion that surrounds the EU. Quite simply I wanted to understand what it was all about. As part of the 'Short Guide' series, the aim is to present topics in an accessible and clear way. What better subject than the EU for this series which despite having such a profound impact on our lives, few truly understand. Unfortunately, I was bitterly disappointed. From the word go, the author makes assumptions and far from presenting the topic in a clear and accessible way - he confuses and almost assumes those reading it are elected EU parliamentarians. I was crying out for a definition of some of the jargon in simple, clear english. What is qualified majority voting for example? If your aim is to give an understanding, you can't assume knowledge and just launch into the first chapter bandying it around. In fact, reading this book is similar to reading a dry contract.

Excellent - a stylish and well-presented introduction., 25 Jun 2001
This is a superbly written précis - ideal for those with only a basic understanding of the complexities of the European Union - and an excellent springboard to more thorough books on the subject. The author is knowledgeable and opinionated, but generally able to present his work in an unbiased manner, without overburdening the reader with technical details about the various institutions.

For such a short book, it is remarkably comprehensive, including political, economic, legal and historical observations. I particularly enjoyed the presentation of the EU's history, with its emphasis on the characters that have been involved in the development of the EU. Pinder's views on Britain's role are obvious - he is a fervent Europhile - but he is also quick to point out the shortcomings of badly conceived or poorly executed policies in which Britain has played no part.

Given the current political climate, it was a pleasure to read a pro-European book written with authority and style. A far cry from the emotive rhetoric that pervaded the recent election campaign. This is compulsory reading for us all before the promised referendum on Europe.

Don't be misled by the simplicity, 08 Oct 2007
I sometimes like this shorter books but not this one. At first I thought that it was the best thing that had ever happened to me in my inability to get to grips with EU law but all the things that I thought I understood I later found that I didn't really because they were all explained in far too simplistic terms. You know there is a difference between simplifying complicated ideas so that you present them in easy to understand terms (which is a good thing if it is done well) and giving the appearance of simplifying things by leaving out all the tricky bits (which is a very very bad thing as it is really misleading). This book gave me a really false sense that I understood the topic but you try taking what this book tells you and writing an essay on the basis of it and you will find that it just doesn't work. It is a bit like trying to understand why a plane stays in the air. If someone tells you that it is because of the design of the wings and to do with air pressure than you can grasp that because it is a very simple explanation but it does not mean that you understand aerodynamic theory. This is exactly what this book does - it feeds you simple statements so that you think that you understand something but it is so over simplified that you understand virtually nothing and that is dangerous

Excellent companion to EU case law, 06 Feb 2002
Brilliant book,explains cases briefly in a no-nonsense way, picks up most vital aspects of cases and avoids all useless arguments.

Excellent Book!, 19 Oct 2007
I'm now in my second year of an undergraduate course and my lecturers had recommended two main books - this one and another EU Law textbook by Jo.Steiner. I first bought the EU book by Jo.Steiner but realised that it had no caselaw (or insufficient at least) and decided to get this book by Burca. I have to say that you can rely on this book alone for the full course, it is very informative and has some interesting small debates on contentious issues. Quite rightly, it can be described as the 'Bible' of EU Law. Despite it being very thick with lots of information, it is very easy to read and comprehend.

In summary, get this book before any others! You would not need to buy any others, but remember always use other books as well for essays!

Why is it so long winded?, 08 Oct 2007
This book is massively over-detailed. Even my lecturer who suggested this book as recommended reading says on her handout 'It has far more detail than you will need on this course but there are nuggets of crucial information amongst all the detail'. Is there really? Well why can't people who are supposed to be such experts in their field that they write what is described as the leading textbooks get to the point a bit more quickly or better still make it clear which bits of their lengthy boredom-fest are the important bits that students need to know. I bought this, read the first reading from it that I had to read for a seminar and sent it back so that I could get a refund. There are tons of good, clear and to the point EU law textbooks out there that are for sale at a fraction of the price of this rambling mammoth so be sure to shop around for a book that is actualy useful (cuts through the chaff for you) rather than making things even more muddled.

Best EU Law book around, 18 Sep 2007
As a law student I've had to shell out loads of money for books that stay on the shelf and barely get opened... after five years of law school I can say without a shadow of a doubt Craig and De Burca was the book I got the most value for money out of. Absolutely, 100% recommended for any law student who will be taking a number of EU courses, or EU Law related degree. If only all other law books were as easy to read as this one!

Claptrap, 19 Jul 2007
This book is totally woeful - it completely misdescribes the crucial principle of indirect effect and is breathtakingly incompetent when discussing the Von Colson principle.

I urge all self-respecting students of the law to steer well clear of this depressing read, it will seriously challenge your will to live.

EU Law textbook review, 27 Jun 2006
Suddenly EU law becomes clear! If, like me, you have struggled to master the various areas and concepts of EU law then this book is for you. Easy to use, easy to read and easy to cross reference to other text books. Well worth the money!

An invaluable contribution to British politics., 16 Sep 2008
I began reading this book knowing relatively little about the EU's history and purpose. By the time I had finished it however, I felt like I had gained a perfect (and frightening) understanding of the Union's true nature. This is not a project based on pragmatism and open-mindedness, but one fuelled by ruthless ideological determination.

Anyone who wishes to obtain an understanding of the European Union should read this fascinating book.

Useful reading., 31 Dec 2007
This is a well written book and takes the reader in a methodical and chronological order through the promises, deceptions and outcomes of the European project from its inception, to the current floundering status of today's EU.

Britain has done well out of the EU from the perspective of its London-centric capital market and the availability of cheap, eastern European labour to circumvent the folly of the minimum wage. Britain's agriculture and fishing industries have met with a great deal of trauma in comparison to others, but we can be very thnakful that, unlike others, we are not held hostage to agriculture, as France and Germany so clearly are.

The bulk of Britain's travails derive from the lunacy that is part and parcel of the British mania for mindless bureaucracy, which is the bane of enterprise and prosperity, and not directly a result of Brussels as France and most other EU memeber-states can attest to. Furthermore, whether intergovernmental or supranatioal, the politicians of consequence--but not necessarily any virtue--can manage with either. Name any who have suffered in any way, post-government?

The real problem with the EU including its member-states, is that democracy and the subsequent government is insufficiently restricted in its scope so that government cannot do the harm it currently can, politically or economically.

As Christopher Booker has pointed out in the final chapter, those who set out to deceive end up deceiving themselves. To that end, reality-economics will sweep away the EU dream as it is currently envisaged by our continental counterparts. This is simply because western Europe is essentially bankrupt, and China and India for example, will not be impeding their own development by way of non-existent environmental concerns, to fend off the evil day.

Readers of this title might wish to read: 'Democrcay, The God That failed' by Hans Herman Hoppe. Which applies equally well to supranationalism or intergovernmentalism.


Well-written, informative history, 21 Oct 2007
Throughout this book there's a great sense that the authors set upon a task to hack through the myriad of spin and complexities of the European Union to set the record straight. And whilst that does lead to a partisan reading regarding some of the characters involved, it should not distract from what is a meticulous and forensic insight into the dynamic of this organization.

Drawing upon de-classified government papers, memoirs and other sources, the history of the organization is crafted in splendid detail, weaving the many architects and actors of this story into a compelling read. In particular, it challenges some of the conventional norms that have rendered the debate in Britain chronically mis-informed and dormant. As such, it might be considered a polemic, but I find some of the dismissals of the text as "conspiracy theories" unfair given the plentiful and rigorous supporting evidence.

Overall a well-written, enjoyable book that brings a very dry subject to life.


Informative history through the eyes of conspiracy theorists, 28 Jul 2007
I can only reaffirm some of the earlier reviews which state that this is a well written, enjoyable account of the history of European integration; however it is spoiled by some rather baffling conclusions concerning hidden agendas, conspiracy theories and downright biased analysis. It's never given a full and detailed airing, but at its heart this book attempts to argue that some clique of Europhile plotters is attempting to hijack European democracies and force European citizens into a giant superstate against their will. The fact that the European Union is not a superstate and cannot feasibly become one in the near future is ignored. The idea that national governments would voluntarily involve themselves in the limited integration which has manifested itself or (heaven forbid) that it's actually in their interests to do so, is written off as either stupidity - Heath didn't know what he was doing - or as some sinister cloak and dagger plot - Heath was actually a secret Europhile mole who infiltrated the government. None of this is credible. Governments involve themselves in the process because they believe it's in their interests to do so, virtually no European government since the 1970's has advocated the creation of a superstate and they are the only actors who can create such a thing.

In short, the authors do an admirable account of describing events in the past, but their analysis and predictions of the future border on the nutty. If you must read this book (and there are other well written histories out there which don't have the political baggage) then do so with more than a pinch of salt.

The most important book on the truth of about the EU ever, 08 May 2007
Before you buy this book you need to ask yourself two questions. Firstly, am I opposed to the EU or at very least very suspicious of it? Secondly, am I very interested in politics? Finally, are you a fan of "deep" reading and not casual reading? If the answer to all of these is yes, then you will greatly enjoy this book. If not, then you will find it hard to get into, let alone finish.

The most striking feature of the book is its exquisite, almost forensic detail. Everything from what was served for dinner at EU meetings to the details of EU treaties are examined, and meticulously referenced, adding a real professional "feel" to this book that one would expect from such an academic endeavour. This instantly gives it a feel of genuine credibility and power so lacking in most books on the matter that tend to veer of either into propagandistic rave reviews or angry rants, dependent upon the attitude to the EU held by the writer. This remarkably well tempered, if hardly neutral account, is extremely refreshing.

One great strength of this book is its careful analysis of the individuals in the EU "project". From its shadowy architect Jean Monnet, right through to its British cheerleaders Ted Heath and Tony Blair, the power of individuals politicians to develop the EU is examined in great depth. Another great strength is its analysis of how the EU has "packaged" itself to try and gain public acquiescence and support for its agenda at various stages in "the project". For example, warning Britain that it would feel "left out" in the 1970s, and warning us that we were headed for a "two speed" Europe in the 1990s unless we complied with their ever expanding list of demands and directives.

The book does have its weaknesses. Firstly, some chapters can feel a little repetitive, especially chapters dealing with EU summits, all of which basically seem to turn out the same, bar a few minor details and this can be a little tiring at times. Another weakness is that whilst the book is very long on diagnosis about the EU, it is very short (in fact barely existent) on cure i.e. what needs to be done about the EU. Given the authors exquisite knowledge of the subject matter, one would have found it interesting to hear their opinions on the subject.

In conclusion, I can honestly say that this book was a genuine eye opener, and I say this as someone who prior to reading it considered myself very well informed about the EU's true nature. However this book has taught me so much more, and I would strongly urge all other serious students of the EU/Eurospecticism to study this book. Forewarned, is forearmed.


The Best book about EU, 06 Jan 2009
I have to buy this book for my carrer. And I don't regret to do it. Dinan offers a great perspective about the EU, is very easy to read and understand, when I was reading it I was feeling that I was reading a novel, and in some point it is. The istory of the EU, even when we just focus on the institutions should be read it as a novel.
As a MA student I highly recommend this book to all the persons that want to learn about the EU.

Top Quality Book, 24 Dec 2000
This is without doubt the best textbook I've read on the EU. It presents the material in an accessible, interesting and informative way. Plenty of history, analysis and topics for discussion. The book is so good that I actually found myself reading it before lectures when I didn't have to! Buy it.

very good, easy to read, interesting, 22 Sep 2000
an excellent book, a very useful textbook for students of european studies. it covers all the aspects of the EU (history, institutions, policies),and apart from just pure data, it gives the whole story of the EU, at some points even too much in detail. a very useful book to have whenever you want to know anything about the EU.

Excellent in principle but now, sadly, out of date, 01 Nov 2005
The EU is a very complex organisation and Pinder provides a clear, structured description, starting with the historical background of the EU's predecessor organisations, moving through its structure and institutions through to key issues such as budget and CAP, and social policy.

His explanation of the difference between a federal approach and inter-governmentalism is particularly interesting to Brits, and he makes the UK's position and actions (and those of others) clear in context.

The principles underlying the EU's creation, development and functioning are clearly explained.

My major criticism, though, is that so much has happened to the EU since the book's publication - the launch of the Euro and the accession of ten further countries in May 2004. These are prospects in the book - what we need is an up-to-date version which describes the impact of these important changes.

Charts of numbers of MEPs (and similar data) by country are of no more than historical interest when they're based on fifteen members. An updated version would get five stars from me.

Unclear and unfocused, 14 Feb 2003
I picked up this book to try and clear some of the confusion that surrounds the EU. Quite simply I wanted to understand what it was all about. As part of the 'Short Guide' series, the aim is to present topics in an accessible and clear way. What better subject than the EU for this series which despite having such a profound impact on our lives, few truly understand. Unfortunately, I was bitterly disappointed. From the word go, the author makes assumptions and far from presenting the topic in a clear and accessible way - he confuses and almost assumes those reading it are elected EU parliamentarians. I was crying out for a definition of some of the jargon in simple, clear english. What is qualified majority voting for example? If your aim is to give an understanding, you can't assume knowledge and just launch into the first chapter bandying it around. In fact, reading this book is similar to reading a dry contract.

Excellent - a stylish and well-presented introduction., 25 Jun 2001
This is a superbly written précis - ideal for those with only a basic understanding of the complexities of the European Union - and an excellent springboard to more thorough books on the subject. The author is knowledgeable and opinionated, but generally able to present his work in an unbiased manner, without overburdening the reader with technical details about the various institutions.

For such a short book, it is remarkably comprehensive, including political, economic, legal and historical observations. I particularly enjoyed the presentation of the EU's history, with its emphasis on the characters that have been involved in the development of the EU. Pinder's views on Britain's role are obvious - he is a fervent Europhile - but he is also quick to point out the shortcomings of badly conceived or poorly executed policies in which Britain has played no part.

Given the current political climate, it was a pleasure to read a pro-European book written with authority and style. A far cry from the emotive rhetoric that pervaded the recent election campaign. This is compulsory reading for us all before the promised referendum on Europe.

Don't be misled by the simplicity, 08 Oct 2007
I sometimes like this shorter books but not this one. At first I thought that it was the best thing that had ever happened to me in my inability to get to grips with EU law but all the things that I thought I understood I later found that I didn't really because they were all explained in far too simplistic terms. You know there is a difference between simplifying complicated ideas so that you present them in easy to understand terms (which is a good thing if it is done well) and giving the appearance of simplifying things by leaving out all the tricky bits (which is a very very bad thing as it is really misleading). This book gave me a really false sense that I understood the topic but you try taking what this book tells you and writing an essay on the basis of it and you will find that it just doesn't work. It is a bit like trying to understand why a plane stays in the air. If someone tells you that it is because of the design of the wings and to do with air pressure than you can grasp that because it is a very simple explanation but it does not mean that you understand aerodynamic theory. This is exactly what this book does - it feeds you simple statements so that you think that you understand something but it is so over simplified that you understand virtually nothing and that is dangerous

Excellent companion to EU case law, 06 Feb 2002
Brilliant book,explains cases briefly in a no-nonsense way, picks up most vital aspects of cases and avoids all useless arguments.

Excellent Book!, 19 Oct 2007
I'm now in my second year of an undergraduate course and my lecturers had recommended two main books - this one and another EU Law textbook by Jo.Steiner. I first bought the EU book by Jo.Steiner but realised that it had no caselaw (or insufficient at least) and decided to get this book by Burca. I have to say that you can rely on this book alone for the full course, it is very informative and has some interesting small debates on contentious issues. Quite rightly, it can be described as the 'Bible' of EU Law. Despite it being very thick with lots of information, it is very easy to read and comprehend.

In summary, get this book before any others! You would not need to buy any others, but remember always use other books as well for essays!

Why is it so long winded?, 08 Oct 2007
This book is massively over-detailed. Even my lecturer who suggested this book as recommended reading says on her handout 'It has far more detail than you will need on this course but there are nuggets of crucial information amongst all the detail'. Is there really? Well why can't people who are supposed to be such experts in their field that they write what is described as the leading textbooks get to the point a bit more quickly or better still make it clear which bits of their lengthy boredom-fest are the important bits that students need to know. I bought this, read the first reading from it that I had to read for a seminar and sent it back so that I could get a refund. There are tons of good, clear and to the point EU law textbooks out there that are for sale at a fraction of the price of this rambling mammoth so be sure to shop around for a book that is actualy useful (cuts through the chaff for you) rather than making things even more muddled.

Best EU Law book around, 18 Sep 2007
As a law student I've had to shell out loads of money for books that stay on the shelf and barely get opened... after five years of law school I can say without a shadow of a doubt Craig and De Burca was the book I got the most value for money out of. Absolutely, 100% recommended for any law student who will be taking a number of EU courses, or EU Law related degree. If only all other law books were as easy to read as this one!

Claptrap, 19 Jul 2007
This book is totally woeful - it completely misdescribes the crucial principle of indirect effect and is breathtakingly incompetent when discussing the Von Colson principle.

I urge all self-respecting students of the law to steer well clear of this depressing read, it will seriously challenge your will to live.

EU Law textbook review, 27 Jun 2006
Suddenly EU law becomes clear! If, like me, you have struggled to master the various areas and concepts of EU law then this book is for you. Easy to use, easy to read and easy to cross reference to other text books. Well worth the money!

An invaluable contribution to British politics., 16 Sep 2008
I began reading this book knowing relatively little about the EU's history and purpose. By the time I had finished it however, I felt like I had gained a perfect (and frightening) understanding of the Union's true nature. This is not a project based on pragmatism and open-mindedness, but one fuelled by ruthless ideological determination.

Anyone who wishes to obtain an understanding of the European Union should read this fascinating book.

Useful reading., 31 Dec 2007
This is a well written book and takes the reader in a methodical and chronological order through the promises, deceptions and outcomes of the European project from its inception, to the current floundering status of today's EU.

Britain has done well out of the EU from the perspective of its London-centric capital market and the availability of cheap, eastern European labour to circumvent the folly of the minimum wage. Britain's agriculture and fishing industries have met with a great deal of trauma in comparison to others, but we can be very thnakful that, unlike others, we are not held hostage to agriculture, as France and Germany so clearly are.

The bulk of Britain's travails derive from the lunacy that is part and parcel of the British mania for mindless bureaucracy, which is the bane of enterprise and prosperity, and not directly a result of Brussels as France and most other EU memeber-states can attest to. Furthermore, whether intergovernmental or supranatioal, the politicians of consequence--but not necessarily any virtue--can manage with either. Name any who have suffered in any way, post-government?

The real problem with the EU including its member-states, is that democracy and the subsequent government is insufficiently restricted in its scope so that government cannot do the harm it currently can, politically or economically.

As Christopher Booker has pointed out in the final chapter, those who set out to deceive end up deceiving themselves. To that end, reality-economics will sweep away the EU dream as it is currently envisaged by our continental counterparts. This is simply because western Europe is essentially bankrupt, and China and India for example, will not be impeding their own development by way of non-existent environmental concerns, to fend off the evil day.

Readers of this title might wish to read: 'Democrcay, The God That failed' by Hans Herman Hoppe. Which applies equally well to supranationalism or intergovernmentalism.


Well-written, informative history, 21 Oct 2007
Throughout this book there's a great sense that the authors set upon a task to hack through the myriad of spin and complexities of the European Union to set the record straight. And whilst that does lead to a partisan reading regarding some of the characters involved, it should not distract from what is a meticulous and forensic insight into the dynamic of this organization.

Drawing upon de-classified government papers, memoirs and other sources, the history of the organization is crafted in splendid detail, weaving the many architects and actors of this story into a compelling read. In particular, it challenges some of the conventional norms that have rendered the debate in Britain chronically mis-informed and dormant. As such, it might be considered a polemic, but I find some of the dismissals of the text as "conspiracy theories" unfair given the plentiful and rigorous supporting evidence.

Overall a well-written, enjoyable book that brings a very dry subject to life.


Informative history through the eyes of conspiracy theorists, 28 Jul 2007
I can only reaffirm some of the earlier reviews which state that this is a well written, enjoyable account of the history of European integration; however it is spoiled by some rather baffling conclusions concerning hidden agendas, conspiracy theories and downright biased analysis. It's never given a full and detailed airing, but at its heart this book attempts to argue that some clique of Europhile plotters is attempting to hijack European democracies and force European citizens into a giant superstate against their will. The fact that the European Union is not a superstate and cannot feasibly become one in the near future is ignored. The idea that national governments would voluntarily involve themselves in the limited integration which has manifested itself or (heaven forbid) that it's actually in their interests to do so, is written off as either stupidity - Heath didn't know what he was doing - or as some sinister cloak and dagger plot - Heath was actually a secret Europhile mole who infiltrated the government. None of this is credible. Governments involve themselves in the process because they believe it's in their interests to do so, virtually no European government since the 1970's has advocated the creation of a superstate and they are the only actors who can create such a thing.

In short, the authors do an admirable account of describing events in the past, but their analysis and predictions of the future border on the nutty. If you must read this book (and there are other well written histories out there which don't have the political baggage) then do so with more than a pinch of salt.

The most important book on the truth of about the EU ever, 08 May 2007
Before you buy this book you need to ask yourself two questions. Firstly, am I opposed to the EU or at very least very suspicious of it? Secondly, am I very interested in politics? Finally, are you a fan of "deep" reading and not casual reading? If the answer to all of these is yes, then you will greatly enjoy this book. If not, then you will find it hard to get into, let alone finish.

The most striking feature of the book is its exquisite, almost forensic detail. Everything from what was served for dinner at EU meetings to the details of EU treaties are examined, and meticulously referenced, adding a real professional "feel" to this book that one would expect from such an academic endeavour. This instantly gives it a feel of genuine credibility and power so lacking in most books on the matter that tend to veer of either into propagandistic rave reviews or angry rants, dependent upon the attitude to the EU held by the writer. This remarkably well tempered, if hardly neutral account, is extremely refreshing.

One great strength of this book is its careful analysis of the individuals in the EU "project". From its shadowy architect Jean Monnet, right through to its British cheerleaders Ted Heath and Tony Blair, the power of individuals politicians to develop the EU is examined in great depth. Another great strength is its analysis of how the EU has "packaged" itself to try and gain public acquiescence and support for its agenda at various stages in "the project". For example, warning Britain that it would feel "left out" in the 1970s, and warning us that we were headed for a "two speed" Europe in the 1990s unless we complied with their ever expanding list of demands and directives.

The book does have its weaknesses. Firstly, some chapters can feel a little repetitive, especially chapters dealing with EU summits, all of which basically seem to turn out the same, bar a few minor details and this can be a little tiring at times. Another weakness is that whilst the book is very long on diagnosis about the EU, it is very short (in fact barely existent) on cure i.e. what needs to be done about the EU. Given the authors exquisite knowledge of the subject matter, one would have found it interesting to hear their opinions on the subject.

In conclusion, I can honestly say that this book was a genuine eye opener, and I say this as someone who prior to reading it considered myself very well informed about the EU's true nature. However this book has taught me so much more, and I would strongly urge all other serious students of the EU/Eurospecticism to study this book. Forewarned, is forearmed.


The Best book about EU, 06 Jan 2009
I have to buy this book for my carrer. And I don't regret to do it. Dinan offers a great perspective about the EU, is very easy to read and understand, when I was reading it I was feeling that I was reading a novel, and in some point it is. The istory of the EU, even when we just focus on the institutions should be read it as a novel.
As a MA student I highly recommend this book to all the persons that want to learn about the EU.

Top Quality Book, 24 Dec 2000
This is without doubt the best textbook I've read on the EU. It presents the material in an accessible, interesting and informative way. Plenty of history, analysis and topics for discussion. The book is so good that I actually found myself reading it before lectures when I didn't have to! Buy it.

very good, easy to read, interesting, 22 Sep 2000
an excellent book, a very useful textbook for students of european studies. it covers all the aspects of the EU (history, institutions, policies),and apart from just pure data, it gives the whole story of the EU, at some points even too much in detail. a very useful book to have whenever you want to know anything about the EU.

European Union Politics- highly recommended, 23 May 2004
I completely agree with the sentiments already expressed, I found this to be really a good book on the European Union. I would recommend this as it gives you a solid base of understanding of what has gone on, is going on and will continue to go on in the EU. The history, the policies, the institutions, the theories and contemporary debates are all addressed, for the most part in a very clear and concise manner.

As a European Studies undergraduate I have found this to have been an invaluable resource in my second year of study especially. However, I will issue a caveat in my praise, in saying that if you are interested in very specific issues, I would suggest that you find other books that deal with them in greater detail. For this is a more general book, and you may find that this book hardly skims the surface in your area of interest. Saying that, as a book that explains the wider picture this book cannot be faulted; and if you are a layman, a history/politics/European Studies student or just a person with a keen interest in current affairs I very much recommend this work by Michelle Cini.

Excellent Overview, 11 Dec 2003
As a postgraduate student of European Studies, I have found Cini's book to be an invaluable resource. The chapters span not just the institutional set-up, but also focuses on policies, issues, theories etc. Cini also does a wonderful job with key points and summaries for each section. This provides an excellent opportunity to refresh one's memory on what is a rather complex subject. In a genre of books that are often too specific or too general, "European Union Politics" shines bright as an essential must have for any student of the European Union.

Excellent in principle but now, sadly, out of date, 01 Nov 2005
The EU is a very complex organisation and Pinder provides a clear, structured description, starting with the historical background of the EU's predecessor organisations, moving through its structure and institutions through to key issues such as budget and CAP, and social policy.

His explanation of the difference between a federal approach and inter-governmentalism is particularly interesting to Brits, and he makes the UK's position and actions (and those of others) clear in context.

The principles underlying the EU's creation, development and functioning are clearly explained.

My major criticism, though, is that so much has happened to the EU since the book's publication - the launch of the Euro and the accession of ten further countries in May 2004. These are prospects in the book - what we need is an up-to-date version which describes the impact of these important changes.

Charts of numbers of MEPs (and similar data) by country are of no more than historical interest when they're based on fifteen members. An updated version would get five stars from me.

Unclear and unfocused, 14 Feb 2003
I picked up this book to try and clear some of the confusion that surrounds the EU. Quite simply I wanted to understand what it was all about. As part of the 'Short Guide' series, the aim is to present topics in an accessible and clear way. What better subject than the EU for this series which despite having such a profound impact on our lives, few truly understand. Unfortunately, I was bitterly disappointed. From the word go, the author makes assumptions and far from presenting the topic in a clear and accessible way - he confuses and almost assumes those reading it are elected EU parliamentarians. I was crying out for a definition of some of the jargon in simple, clear english. What is qualified majority voting for example? If your aim is to give an understanding, you can't assume knowledge and just launch into the first chapter bandying it around. In fact, reading this book is similar to reading a dry contract.

Excellent - a stylish and well-presented introduction., 25 Jun 2001
This is a superbly written précis - ideal for those with only a basic understanding of the complexities of the European Union - and an excellent springboard to more thorough books on the subject. The author is knowledgeable and opinionated, but generally able to present his work in an unbiased manner, without overburdening the reader with technical details about the various institutions.

For such a short book, it is remarkably comprehensive, including political, economic, legal and historical observations. I particularly enjoyed the presentation of the EU's history, with its emphasis on the characters that have been involved in the development of the EU. Pinder's views on Britain's role are obvious - he is a fervent Europhile - but he is also quick to point out the shortcomings of badly conceived or poorly executed policies in which Britain has played no part.

Given the current political climate, it was a pleasure to read a pro-European book written with authority and style. A far cry from the emotive rhetoric that pervaded the recent election campaign. This is compulsory reading for us all before the promised referendum on Europe.

Don't be misled by the simplicity, 08 Oct 2007
I sometimes like this shorter books but not this one. At first I thought that it was the best thing that had ever happened to me in my inability to get to grips with EU law but all the things that I thought I understood I later found that I didn't really because they were all explained in far too simplistic terms. You know there is a difference between simplifying complicated ideas so that you present them in easy to understand terms (which is a good thing if it is done well) and giving the appearance of simplifying things by leaving out all the tricky bits (which is a very very bad thing as it is really misleading). This book gave me a really false sense that I understood the topic but you try taking what this book tells you and writing an essay on the basis of it and you will find that it just doesn't work. It is a bit like trying to understand why a plane stays in the air. If someone tells you that it is because of the design of the wings and to do with air pressure than you can grasp that because it is a very simple explanation but it does not mean that you understand aerodynamic theory. This is exactly what this book does - it feeds you simple statements so that you think that you understand something but it is so over simplified that you understand virtually nothing and that is dangerous

Excellent companion to EU case law, 06 Feb 2002
Brilliant book,explains cases briefly in a no-nonsense way, picks up most vital aspects of cases and avoids all useless arguments.

Excellent Book!, 19 Oct 2007
I'm now in my second year of an undergraduate course and my lecturers had recommended two main books - this one and another EU Law textbook by Jo.Steiner. I first bought the EU book by Jo.Steiner but realised that it had no caselaw (or insufficient at least) and decided to get this book by Burca. I have to say that you can rely on this book alone for the full course, it is very informative and has some interesting small debates on contentious issues. Quite rightly, it can be described as the 'Bible' of EU Law. Despite it being very thick with lots of information, it is very easy to read and comprehend.

In summary, get this book before any others! You would not need to buy any others, but remember always use other books as well for essays!

Why is it so long winded?, 08 Oct 2007
This book is massively over-detailed. Even my lecturer who suggested this book as recommended reading says on her handout 'It has far more detail than you will need on this course but there are nuggets of crucial information amongst all the detail'. Is there really? Well why can't people who are supposed to be such experts in their field that they write what is described as the leading textbooks get to the point a bit more quickly or better still make it clear which bits of their lengthy boredom-fest are the important bits that students need to know. I bought this, read the first reading from it that I had to read for a seminar and sent it back so that I could get a refund. There are tons of good, clear and to the point EU law textbooks out there that are for sale at a fraction of the price of this rambling mammoth so be sure to shop around for a book that is actualy useful (cuts through the chaff for you) rather than making things even more muddled.

Best EU Law book around, 18 Sep 2007
As a law student I've had to shell out loads of money for books that stay on the shelf and barely get opened... after five years of law school I can say without a shadow of a doubt Craig and De Burca was the book I got the most value for money out of. Absolutely, 100% recommended for any law student who will be taking a number of EU courses, or EU Law related degree. If only all other law books were as easy to read as this one!

Claptrap, 19 Jul 2007
This book is totally woeful - it completely misdescribes the crucial principle of indirect effect and is breathtakingly incompetent when discussing the Von Colson principle.

I urge all self-respecting students of the law to steer well clear of this depressing read, it will seriously challenge your will to live.

EU Law textbook review, 27 Jun 2006
Suddenly EU law becomes clear! If, like me, you have struggled to master the various areas and concepts of EU law then this book is for you. Easy to use, easy to read and easy to cross reference to other text books. Well worth the money!

An invaluable contribution to British politics., 16 Sep 2008
I began reading this book knowing relatively little about the EU's history and purpose. By the time I had finished it however, I felt like I had gained a perfect (and frightening) understanding of the Union's true nature. This is not a project based on pragmatism and open-mindedness, but one fuelled by ruthless ideological determination.

Anyone who wishes to obtain an understanding of the European Union should read this fascinating book.

Useful reading., 31 Dec 2007
This is a well written book and takes the reader in a methodical and chronological order through the promises, deceptions and outcomes of the European project from its inception, to the current floundering status of today's EU.

Britain has done well out of the EU from the perspective of its London-centric capital market and the availability of cheap, eastern European labour to circumvent the folly of the minimum wage. Britain's agriculture and fishing industries have met with a great deal of trauma in comparison to others, but we can be very thnakful that, unlike others, we are not held hostage to agriculture, as France and Germany so clearly are.

The bulk of Britain's travails derive from the lunacy that is part and parcel of the British mania for mindless bureaucracy, which is the bane of enterprise and prosperity, and not directly a result of Brussels as France and most other EU memeber-states can attest to. Furthermore, whether intergovernmental or supranatioal, the politicians of consequence--but not necessarily any virtue--can manage with either. Name any who have suffered in any way, post-government?

The real problem with the EU including its member-states, is that democracy and the subsequent government is insufficiently restricted in its scope so that government cannot do the harm it currently can, politically or economically.

As Christopher Booker has pointed out in the final chapter, those who set out to deceive end up deceiving themselves. To that end, reality-economics will sweep away the EU dream as it is currently envisaged by our continental counterparts. This is simply because western Europe is essentially bankrupt, and China and India for example, will not be impeding their own development by way of non-existent environmental concerns, to fend off the evil day.

Readers of this title might wish to read: 'Democrcay, The God That failed' by Hans Herman Hoppe. Which applies equally well to supranationalism or intergovernmentalism.


Well-written, informative history, 21 Oct 2007
Throughout this book there's a great sense that the authors set upon a task to hack through the myriad of spin and complexities of the European Union to set the record straight. And whilst that does lead to a partisan reading regarding some of the characters involved, it should not distract from what is a meticulous and forensic insight into the dynamic of this organization.

Drawing upon de-classified government papers, memoirs and other sources, the history of the organization is crafted in splendid detail, weaving the many architects and actors of this story into a compelling read. In particular, it challenges some of the conventional norms that have rendered the debate in Britain chronically mis-informed and dormant. As such, it might be considered a polemic, but I find some of the dismissals of the text as "conspiracy theories" unfair given the plentiful and rigorous supporting evidence.

Overall a well-written, enjoyable book that brings a very dry subject to life.


Informative history through the eyes of conspiracy theorists, 28 Jul 2007
I can only reaffirm some of the earlier reviews which state that this is a well written, enjoyable account of the history of European integration; however it is spoiled by some rather baffling conclusions concerning hidden agendas, conspiracy theories and downright biased analysis. It's never given a full and detailed airing, but at its heart this book attempts to argue that some clique of Europhile plotters is attempting to hijack European democracies and force European citizens into a giant superstate against their will. The fact that the European Union is not a superstate and cannot feasibly become one in the near future is ignored. The idea that national governments would voluntarily involve themselves in the limited integration which has manifested itself or (heaven forbid) that it's actually in their interests to do so, is written off as either stupidity - Heath didn't know what he was doing - or as some sinister cloak and dagger plot - Heath was actually a secret Europhile mole who infiltrated the government. None of this is credible. Governments involve themselves in the process because they believe it's in their interests to do so, virtually no European government since the 1970's has advocated the creation of a superstate and they are the only actors who can create such a thing.

In short, the authors do an admirable account of describing events in the past, but their analysis and predictions of the future border on the nutty. If you must read this book (and there are other well written histories out there which don't have the political baggage) then do so with more than a pinch of salt.

The most important book on the truth of about the EU ever, 08 May 2007
Before you buy this book you need to ask yourself two questions. Firstly, am I opposed to the EU or at very least very suspicious of it? Secondly, am I very interested in politics? Finally, are you a fan of "deep" reading and not casual reading? If the answer to all of these is yes, then you will greatly enjoy this book. If not, then you will find it hard to get into, let alone finish.

The most striking feature of the book is its exquisite, almost forensic detail. Everything from what was served for dinner at EU meetings to the details of EU treaties are examined, and meticulously referenced, adding a real professional "feel" to this book that one would expect from such an academic endeavour. This instantly gives it a feel of genuine credibility and power so lacking in most books on the matter that tend to veer of either into propagandistic rave reviews or angry rants, dependent upon the attitude to the EU held by the writer. This remarkably well tempered, if hardly neutral account, is extremely refreshing.

One great strength of this book is its careful analysis of the individuals in the EU "project". From its shadowy architect Jean Monnet, right through to its British cheerleaders Ted Heath and Tony Blair, the power of individuals politicians to develop the EU is examined in great depth. Another great strength is its analysis of how the EU has "packaged" itself to try and gain public acquiescence and support for its agenda at various stages in "the project". For example, warning Britain that it would feel "left out" in the 1970s, and warning us that we were headed for a "two speed" Europe in the 1990s unless we complied with their ever expanding list of demands and directives.

The book does have its weaknesses. Firstly, some chapters can feel a little repetitive, especially chapters dealing with EU summits, all of which basically seem to turn out the same, bar a few minor details and this can be a little tiring at times. Another weakness is that whilst the book is very long on diagnosis about the EU, it is very short (in fact barely existent) on cure i.e. what needs to be done about the EU. Given the authors exquisite knowledge of the subject matter, one would have found it interesting to hear their opinions on the subject.

In conclusion, I can honestly say that this book was a genuine eye opener, and I say this as someone who prior to reading it considered myself very well informed about the EU's true nature. However this book has taught me so much more, and I would strongly urge all other serious students of the EU/Eurospecticism to study this book. Forewarned, is forearmed.


The Best book about EU, 06 Jan 2009
I have to buy this book for my carrer. And I don't regret to do it. Dinan offers a great perspective about the EU, is very easy to read and understand, when I was reading it I was feeling that I was reading a novel, and in some point it is. The istory of the EU, even when we just focus on the institutions should be read it as a novel.
As a MA student I highly recommend this book to all the persons that want to learn about the EU.

Top Quality Book, 24 Dec 2000
This is without doubt the best textbook I've read on the EU. It presents the material in an accessible, interesting and informative way. Plenty of history, analysis and topics for discussion. The book is so good that I actually found myself reading it before lectures when I didn't have to! Buy it.

very good, easy to read, interesting, 22 Sep 2000
an excellent book, a very useful textbook for students of european studies. it covers all the aspects of the EU (history, institutions, policies),and apart from just pure data, it gives the whole story of the EU, at some points even too much in detail. a very useful book to have whenever you want to know anything about the EU.

European Union Politics- highly recommended, 23 May 2004
I completely agree with the sentiments already expressed, I found this to be really a good book on the European Union. I would recommend this as it gives you a solid base of understanding of what has gone on, is going on and will continue to go on in the EU. The history, the policies, the institutions, the theories and contemporary debates are all addressed, for the most part in a very clear and concise manner.

As a European Studies undergraduate I have found this to have been an invaluable resource in my second year of study especially. However, I will issue a caveat in my praise, in saying that if you are interested in very specific issues, I would suggest that you find other books that deal with them in greater detail. For this is a more general book, and you may find that this book hardly skims the surface in your area of interest. Saying that, as a book that explains the wider picture this book cannot be faulted; and if you are a layman, a history/politics/European Studies student or just a person with a keen interest in current affairs I very much recommend this work by Michelle Cini.

Excellent Overview, 11 Dec 2003
As a postgraduate student of European Studies, I have found Cini's book to be an invaluable resource. The chapters span not just the institutional set-up, but also focuses on policies, issues, theories etc. Cini also does a wonderful job with key points and summaries for each section. This provides an excellent opportunity to refresh one's memory on what is a rather complex subject. In a genre of books that are often too specific or too general, "European Union Politics" shines bright as an essential must have for any student of the European Union.

A Sheffield Politics Student, 16 Aug 2008
I am currently studying politics and international relations at the University of Sheffield and have just completed the European Union module taught by Ian Bache.
The specifics of the book have been outlined in the above reviews, I'd just like to note its usefulness, or not, to Sheffield students in particular, but politics students in general.
The book is on the recommended book list and a chapter or two are always on the weekly reading list. So from that point of view a worthwhile buy. However it is also available as an electronic version via the library website for students to access for those that dont mind reading from the screen and can save you a fair amount of money.
Ian also bases his lectures around these chapters so depending on your point of view it can become repetative or re-afirming to have a copy of this book.
On a wider point, friends of mine at other uni's across the UK doing politics also have copies of this book on their shelves, so definately a core student textbook, and every bit as useful as outlined above.

My Bible, 24 Nov 2006
Politics of the European Union is my bible and Bache and George are my Gods! This book is brilliant for anyone studying the European Union. The layout is clear and well organised, with special concepts highlighted separatly from the main text. Each chapter is concluded with a 'Key Points' section and suggestions for further reading.

This book provides a foundation to the EU and is always my first point of call, before going on to more advanced and specific reading. Definitely a book for anyone studying the EU.

A very good introductory book, 10 Jun 2001
This co-authored volume by the two Sheffield University academics is a welcome addition to the vast array of 'introductory' books on the European Union. To some extent it builds upon S. George's previous book "Politics and Policy in the European Union" but has been vastly expanded and updated. Distinct from other books (such as Hix and edited books by Richardson and Wallace) it present a broad overview over integration and governance theory, the history of the EU, the context within the biggest member states, the institutions, and some key policy sectors. It thus provides a good reference point for any student on all aspects of EU studies. It is particularly strong in outlining and explaining the important theories that structure the academic debate about integration and policy-making. The subsequent chapters provide a good introduction to the institutions and policy sectors by positioning them within the theoretical framework outlined in the first chapters and by linking them to the ongoing academic debate. The theoretical introduction is particularly good, as are the chapters on the Commission and on cohesion policies. Frequent use of boxed features and diagrams, as well as the inclusion of important key points and a short guide to further reading at the end of each chapter, make this the ideal text book for undergraduate students who are new to European politics. Yet, for more advanced students this book hardly provides any new insights. Those who wish to gain further and deeper understanding of European politics are advised to read some of the books and articles referenced in the book (but beware of some typos: 'International Organization' became 'Political Organization' on p.287). Nevertheless, this is probably the best comprehensive introductory textbook on the European Union and is thus highly recommended.