Noble/Humble, 25 Apr 2007
A line towards the end of the book where Malcolm is in his car and another car pulls up besdies him an a white man peers out saying do you mind shaking hands with a white man and his reply is i'll shake hands with any human being.

If this was only the case even in our present time!!!

The world might have over clouded the race issue but it still exists out there. Such a shame.



black or white? read this!, 22 Jan 2007
Nowadays it is as clear as ever that when the White House wants to take a complex issue and paint it 'black and white' [forgive the pun] you can be sure that there is far more to the issue. Rather than a pantomime villain, rotten to the core, as some would like to portray him, Malcolm X comes across, both in the autobiographical text and the foreward by his friend who transcribed his words, as a man of passion and integrity. Although I myself am white, I think 'noble' is probably the best word to describe my impression of Malcolm X. The point is raised that Dr King appealed to the better-off Blacks and that Malcolm X found more of a following among the most impoverished; a proletariat within a protelariat, you might say. It is a great shame that towards the end of his life, Malcolm X finally came to see that the actions of the White Man and not the White Man per se were the problem, and did not live much longer to give the benefit of his new perspective. He was seen as too moderate for the radicals [ie. Nation of Islam] and vice versa. This book also informs us of the mythology of the Nation of Islam, and its leader Elijah Muhammad, with whom Malcolm X fell out of favour. This book is highly recommended, particularly if you would like to hear the other side of the story.

ultra great.., 28 Jul 2006
I wish i could go for more than 5 stars!
This is a book that you really have to start by reading the 'forward' fully... It will give you a taste of the rest of the book and it will guide through the different stages of Malcolm's life which -trust me- are many and very fascinating...
Malcolm has been very honest and made his visions and philosophies so clear for everyone and he easily admits his mistakes but also strongly adheres to his beliefs... This has made the great man he was... or shall I say he 'is'... In short he is a man who acknowledges his weaknesses but also is proud of his strength...
You will love this book... I know I did.

A MUST READ FOR EVERY HUMAN BEING, 08 Mar 2006
What an amazing book, a guaranteed life changer.
Few men are as great as Malcolm X was, a man who recognises the errors of his ways and then goes about correcting himself knowing full well it could get him killed, that is a true man.

His whole story, from when he was still in his mothers womb to his assassination, is an astounding journey and gives you a real insight on why and how he became what he was and the situation in America and the world at the time. Starting out as a petty criminal then moving to effectively be the main man in the NOI and finally his pilgrimage to Mecca and transformation into a Sunni Muslim, it shows how God works his power and guides those he wishes to guide in ways man can never imagine.

It also shows the great level of intelligence Malcolm X had and how he did more for civil rights with a clean heart than anyone else and was not interested in recognition by the state like certain other leaders, after reading the book your life will be affected in a positive manner for sure.

Brilliant and Sharp, 20 Nov 2005
This book is amazing, not only is it an autobiography but a historical book. This book can give insight to people of this generation about the ways in which black American culture of its time was run, the stuggle in which blacks faced and also about coming to terms with truths even though it may go against what you think. Great read!

Noble/Humble, 25 Apr 2007
A line towards the end of the book where Malcolm is in his car and another car pulls up besdies him an a white man peers out saying do you mind shaking hands with a white man and his reply is i'll shake hands with any human being.

If this was only the case even in our present time!!!

The world might have over clouded the race issue but it still exists out there. Such a shame.



black or white? read this!, 22 Jan 2007
Nowadays it is as clear as ever that when the White House wants to take a complex issue and paint it 'black and white' [forgive the pun] you can be sure that there is far more to the issue. Rather than a pantomime villain, rotten to the core, as some would like to portray him, Malcolm X comes across, both in the autobiographical text and the foreward by his friend who transcribed his words, as a man of passion and integrity. Although I myself am white, I think 'noble' is probably the best word to describe my impression of Malcolm X. The point is raised that Dr King appealed to the better-off Blacks and that Malcolm X found more of a following among the most impoverished; a proletariat within a protelariat, you might say. It is a great shame that towards the end of his life, Malcolm X finally came to see that the actions of the White Man and not the White Man per se were the problem, and did not live much longer to give the benefit of his new perspective. He was seen as too moderate for the radicals [ie. Nation of Islam] and vice versa. This book also informs us of the mythology of the Nation of Islam, and its leader Elijah Muhammad, with whom Malcolm X fell out of favour. This book is highly recommended, particularly if you would like to hear the other side of the story.

ultra great.., 28 Jul 2006
I wish i could go for more than 5 stars!
This is a book that you really have to start by reading the 'forward' fully... It will give you a taste of the rest of the book and it will guide through the different stages of Malcolm's life which -trust me- are many and very fascinating...
Malcolm has been very honest and made his visions and philosophies so clear for everyone and he easily admits his mistakes but also strongly adheres to his beliefs... This has made the great man he was... or shall I say he 'is'... In short he is a man who acknowledges his weaknesses but also is proud of his strength...
You will love this book... I know I did.

A MUST READ FOR EVERY HUMAN BEING, 08 Mar 2006
What an amazing book, a guaranteed life changer.
Few men are as great as Malcolm X was, a man who recognises the errors of his ways and then goes about correcting himself knowing full well it could get him killed, that is a true man.

His whole story, from when he was still in his mothers womb to his assassination, is an astounding journey and gives you a real insight on why and how he became what he was and the situation in America and the world at the time. Starting out as a petty criminal then moving to effectively be the main man in the NOI and finally his pilgrimage to Mecca and transformation into a Sunni Muslim, it shows how God works his power and guides those he wishes to guide in ways man can never imagine.

It also shows the great level of intelligence Malcolm X had and how he did more for civil rights with a clean heart than anyone else and was not interested in recognition by the state like certain other leaders, after reading the book your life will be affected in a positive manner for sure.

Brilliant and Sharp, 20 Nov 2005
This book is amazing, not only is it an autobiography but a historical book. This book can give insight to people of this generation about the ways in which black American culture of its time was run, the stuggle in which blacks faced and also about coming to terms with truths even though it may go against what you think. Great read!

Doesn't quite do this profound man the justice he deserves, 24 Jul 2008
Sadly I was a little disappointed with this. After watching Richard Attenborough's epic with Ben Kingsley, I was so inspired that I had to read more about this inspirational man, so I went straight to the library to get his autobiography.

When will I learn?! I'm not a big fan of autobiographies as, no matter how interesting the person, they tend to be dull and tedious, concentrating on the minutiae, rather than the overall bigger picture. As autobiographies go, this is a strange one. It is what it says on the cover - a series of brief descriptions of his many experiments with the principles of Satya (truth), Ahimsa (non-violence), Religion and Diet. It also charts his journeys through South Africa and India and his dealings with the Governments of the time, pioneering the principle of Satyagraha (mass civil disobedience). There are gaps, however, which was annoying as a reader when the Author declines to describe a particular event, but refers you to another of his books. However, Gandhi writes exquisitely, and his use of language is exemplary. In this respect it was a pleasure to read. Credit must also go to the translator of course, Mahadev Desai.

The theme which resonated most with me was, strangely, his experiments with religion. Strangely, as I'm an atheist. His quest for a better understanding of all religions is admirable. Perhaps if religious leaders all over the world were to be as reasonable and pragmatic as Gandhi, we might not have so many wars based on religion. Gandhi might not have agreed with all principles from every religion, but the very fact that he was willing to acknowledge their existence makes him a better man than most. India and the Indian people have a baffling number of religions and languages. It was interesting to learn a little more about the country at the time, the abject poverty, the politics, the caste system. His philanthropic nature is both bewildering and admirable. He had an inherent need to improve the lives of his fellow countrymen. He certainly was unique and its a shame that there are not more like him in the world today.

Interesting read, 22 Jan 2008
I have read this in the last 12 months and have to say that it is an eye opening book. The sacrifices made, the times it was set in and the general opposition in many countries to many foreigners makes me wonder how one man done so much in one life time.

Its not an easy read in my opinion, but certainly a book that tells it from MK Ghandis side. A book that i wanted to read as an Indian but more importantly as a human who queried how can one man change the world.


Men are mere mortals compared to this man, 25 Sep 2006
My words fail to signify what this man was and still is all about. I can only hope to absorb some of the words handed over to the world from someone who knew what it was all about, he even knew of his impending death. Please accept my words and please make me a better person for having read this book of wonderment.

Everyone should read this book, 06 Jun 2005
In his own words Gandhi takes us through some of the experiences in his life, with each chapter forming at least one important learning lesson to him. All experiences, whether good or bad, had a positive learning lesson on him and contributed to his goal of seeking the truth.

One of his main beliefs was using non-violence as a means of protesting against acts of oppression and using international law to seek justice. This meant he never raised his fists or lowered himself to barbarism however much he was provoked, violated or attacked. In fact this seems to be the opposite attitude demonstrated by all terrorists and most countries (West, Middle East and East) where the belief is that violence and war works. It never has and never will. As Gandhi says "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind".

As we have now entered the third of the world wars, where the weapons are horrific and the consequences unimaginable, Gandhi's words have never been more important. All politicians and world leaders should read this book. In fact everyone should read this book.

This is the book that will give you lots of food for thought, 03 Jul 2000
Gandhi was such a great man with visionary beyond his time. With courage, self-willed and disciplined mind. He was one of a few who can achieved what he did in one life time. I truly enjoyed this book and recommend it to anyone who is searching for the meaning of life.

Noble/Humble, 25 Apr 2007
A line towards the end of the book where Malcolm is in his car and another car pulls up besdies him an a white man peers out saying do you mind shaking hands with a white man and his reply is i'll shake hands with any human being.

If this was only the case even in our present time!!!

The world might have over clouded the race issue but it still exists out there. Such a shame.



black or white? read this!, 22 Jan 2007
Nowadays it is as clear as ever that when the White House wants to take a complex issue and paint it 'black and white' [forgive the pun] you can be sure that there is far more to the issue. Rather than a pantomime villain, rotten to the core, as some would like to portray him, Malcolm X comes across, both in the autobiographical text and the foreward by his friend who transcribed his words, as a man of passion and integrity. Although I myself am white, I think 'noble' is probably the best word to describe my impression of Malcolm X. The point is raised that Dr King appealed to the better-off Blacks and that Malcolm X found more of a following among the most impoverished; a proletariat within a protelariat, you might say. It is a great shame that towards the end of his life, Malcolm X finally came to see that the actions of the White Man and not the White Man per se were the problem, and did not live much longer to give the benefit of his new perspective. He was seen as too moderate for the radicals [ie. Nation of Islam] and vice versa. This book also informs us of the mythology of the Nation of Islam, and its leader Elijah Muhammad, with whom Malcolm X fell out of favour. This book is highly recommended, particularly if you would like to hear the other side of the story.

ultra great.., 28 Jul 2006
I wish i could go for more than 5 stars!
This is a book that you really have to start by reading the 'forward' fully... It will give you a taste of the rest of the book and it will guide through the different stages of Malcolm's life which -trust me- are many and very fascinating...
Malcolm has been very honest and made his visions and philosophies so clear for everyone and he easily admits his mistakes but also strongly adheres to his beliefs... This has made the great man he was... or shall I say he 'is'... In short he is a man who acknowledges his weaknesses but also is proud of his strength...
You will love this book... I know I did.

A MUST READ FOR EVERY HUMAN BEING, 08 Mar 2006
What an amazing book, a guaranteed life changer.
Few men are as great as Malcolm X was, a man who recognises the errors of his ways and then goes about correcting himself knowing full well it could get him killed, that is a true man.

His whole story, from when he was still in his mothers womb to his assassination, is an astounding journey and gives you a real insight on why and how he became what he was and the situation in America and the world at the time. Starting out as a petty criminal then moving to effectively be the main man in the NOI and finally his pilgrimage to Mecca and transformation into a Sunni Muslim, it shows how God works his power and guides those he wishes to guide in ways man can never imagine.

It also shows the great level of intelligence Malcolm X had and how he did more for civil rights with a clean heart than anyone else and was not interested in recognition by the state like certain other leaders, after reading the book your life will be affected in a positive manner for sure.

Brilliant and Sharp, 20 Nov 2005
This book is amazing, not only is it an autobiography but a historical book. This book can give insight to people of this generation about the ways in which black American culture of its time was run, the stuggle in which blacks faced and also about coming to terms with truths even though it may go against what you think. Great read!

Doesn't quite do this profound man the justice he deserves, 24 Jul 2008
Sadly I was a little disappointed with this. After watching Richard Attenborough's epic with Ben Kingsley, I was so inspired that I had to read more about this inspirational man, so I went straight to the library to get his autobiography.

When will I learn?! I'm not a big fan of autobiographies as, no matter how interesting the person, they tend to be dull and tedious, concentrating on the minutiae, rather than the overall bigger picture. As autobiographies go, this is a strange one. It is what it says on the cover - a series of brief descriptions of his many experiments with the principles of Satya (truth), Ahimsa (non-violence), Religion and Diet. It also charts his journeys through South Africa and India and his dealings with the Governments of the time, pioneering the principle of Satyagraha (mass civil disobedience). There are gaps, however, which was annoying as a reader when the Author declines to describe a particular event, but refers you to another of his books. However, Gandhi writes exquisitely, and his use of language is exemplary. In this respect it was a pleasure to read. Credit must also go to the translator of course, Mahadev Desai.

The theme which resonated most with me was, strangely, his experiments with religion. Strangely, as I'm an atheist. His quest for a better understanding of all religions is admirable. Perhaps if religious leaders all over the world were to be as reasonable and pragmatic as Gandhi, we might not have so many wars based on religion. Gandhi might not have agreed with all principles from every religion, but the very fact that he was willing to acknowledge their existence makes him a better man than most. India and the Indian people have a baffling number of religions and languages. It was interesting to learn a little more about the country at the time, the abject poverty, the politics, the caste system. His philanthropic nature is both bewildering and admirable. He had an inherent need to improve the lives of his fellow countrymen. He certainly was unique and its a shame that there are not more like him in the world today.

Interesting read, 22 Jan 2008
I have read this in the last 12 months and have to say that it is an eye opening book. The sacrifices made, the times it was set in and the general opposition in many countries to many foreigners makes me wonder how one man done so much in one life time.

Its not an easy read in my opinion, but certainly a book that tells it from MK Ghandis side. A book that i wanted to read as an Indian but more importantly as a human who queried how can one man change the world.


Men are mere mortals compared to this man, 25 Sep 2006
My words fail to signify what this man was and still is all about. I can only hope to absorb some of the words handed over to the world from someone who knew what it was all about, he even knew of his impending death. Please accept my words and please make me a better person for having read this book of wonderment.

Everyone should read this book, 06 Jun 2005
In his own words Gandhi takes us through some of the experiences in his life, with each chapter forming at least one important learning lesson to him. All experiences, whether good or bad, had a positive learning lesson on him and contributed to his goal of seeking the truth.

One of his main beliefs was using non-violence as a means of protesting against acts of oppression and using international law to seek justice. This meant he never raised his fists or lowered himself to barbarism however much he was provoked, violated or attacked. In fact this seems to be the opposite attitude demonstrated by all terrorists and most countries (West, Middle East and East) where the belief is that violence and war works. It never has and never will. As Gandhi says "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind".

As we have now entered the third of the world wars, where the weapons are horrific and the consequences unimaginable, Gandhi's words have never been more important. All politicians and world leaders should read this book. In fact everyone should read this book.

This is the book that will give you lots of food for thought, 03 Jul 2000
Gandhi was such a great man with visionary beyond his time. With courage, self-willed and disciplined mind. He was one of a few who can achieved what he did in one life time. I truly enjoyed this book and recommend it to anyone who is searching for the meaning of life.

Surprisingly good attempt to make anarchism seem reasonable, 17 Nov 2008
The author had been an architect and a teacher and this book is a brave attempt to make anarchy seem reasonable.

The author of course dismisses all the pointless assassinations carried out by anarchists in the late nineteennth and early twentieth centuries as mere aberrations.

Although some of his ideas initially sound attractive and plausible a litte thought would soon make one dismisss them as impractable.

Whilst I don't support anarchism, I do however think that our government has become too big and too involved with every aspect of our daily lives. We do need to find a way of getting unnecessary governmental interference and bureaucracy out of our lives.



Provocative,, 21 Oct 2007
Ward quotes Martin Buber: "All forms of government has this in common: each possesses more power than is required by the given conditions." Buber calls this this "political surplus". One only has to look around the world to see how such political surplus is spent.

I was surprised at the extent of anarchist influence. Ward devotes 4 pages to how anarchism functioned practically is Spain in the 1930's, where 3 million people were organized in anarchist communes.

Anarchists have been at the forefront of considering ecological sustainability. Ward cites authors who believe that anarchism is the only approach that can meet the ecological challenges we face.

Given the problems socialism has faced, Ward argues it is too soon to write off anarchism when looking for alternatives to present forms of government. We may have been taught little about anarchism except to be dismissive of it, but Ward's book is an excellent start to understanding what anarchism offers. There are many references to the works of anarchists.

If capitalism seems to work, albeit at a considerable ecological cost, the growing ecological crises may force us within our lifetimes to explore alternative ways of living. Socialism may not be a big enough change, retaining as it does a strong central government with its own political surplus. If you think you can manage more political participation that casting a vote every few years, anarchism may be worth studying.

Noble/Humble, 25 Apr 2007
A line towards the end of the book where Malcolm is in his car and another car pulls up besdies him an a white man peers out saying do you mind shaking hands with a white man and his reply is i'll shake hands with any human being.

If this was only the case even in our present time!!!

The world might have over clouded the race issue but it still exists out there. Such a shame.



black or white? read this!, 22 Jan 2007
Nowadays it is as clear as ever that when the White House wants to take a complex issue and paint it 'black and white' [forgive the pun] you can be sure that there is far more to the issue. Rather than a pantomime villain, rotten to the core, as some would like to portray him, Malcolm X comes across, both in the autobiographical text and the foreward by his friend who transcribed his words, as a man of passion and integrity. Although I myself am white, I think 'noble' is probably the best word to describe my impression of Malcolm X. The point is raised that Dr King appealed to the better-off Blacks and that Malcolm X found more of a following among the most impoverished; a proletariat within a protelariat, you might say. It is a great shame that towards the end of his life, Malcolm X finally came to see that the actions of the White Man and not the White Man per se were the problem, and did not live much longer to give the benefit of his new perspective. He was seen as too moderate for the radicals [ie. Nation of Islam] and vice versa. This book also informs us of the mythology of the Nation of Islam, and its leader Elijah Muhammad, with whom Malcolm X fell out of favour. This book is highly recommended, particularly if you would like to hear the other side of the story.

ultra great.., 28 Jul 2006
I wish i could go for more than 5 stars!
This is a book that you really have to start by reading the 'forward' fully... It will give you a taste of the rest of the book and it will guide through the different stages of Malcolm's life which -trust me- are many and very fascinating...
Malcolm has been very honest and made his visions and philosophies so clear for everyone and he easily admits his mistakes but also strongly adheres to his beliefs... This has made the great man he was... or shall I say he 'is'... In short he is a man who acknowledges his weaknesses but also is proud of his strength...
You will love this book... I know I did.

A MUST READ FOR EVERY HUMAN BEING, 08 Mar 2006
What an amazing book, a guaranteed life changer.
Few men are as great as Malcolm X was, a man who recognises the errors of his ways and then goes about correcting himself knowing full well it could get him killed, that is a true man.

His whole story, from when he was still in his mothers womb to his assassination, is an astounding journey and gives you a real insight on why and how he became what he was and the situation in America and the world at the time. Starting out as a petty criminal then moving to effectively be the main man in the NOI and finally his pilgrimage to Mecca and transformation into a Sunni Muslim, it shows how God works his power and guides those he wishes to guide in ways man can never imagine.

It also shows the great level of intelligence Malcolm X had and how he did more for civil rights with a clean heart than anyone else and was not interested in recognition by the state like certain other leaders, after reading the book your life will be affected in a positive manner for sure.

Brilliant and Sharp, 20 Nov 2005
This book is amazing, not only is it an autobiography but a historical book. This book can give insight to people of this generation about the ways in which black American culture of its time was run, the stuggle in which blacks faced and also about coming to terms with truths even though it may go against what you think. Great read!

Doesn't quite do this profound man the justice he deserves, 24 Jul 2008
Sadly I was a little disappointed with this. After watching Richard Attenborough's epic with Ben Kingsley, I was so inspired that I had to read more about this inspirational man, so I went straight to the library to get his autobiography.

When will I learn?! I'm not a big fan of autobiographies as, no matter how interesting the person, they tend to be dull and tedious, concentrating on the minutiae, rather than the overall bigger picture. As autobiographies go, this is a strange one. It is what it says on the cover - a series of brief descriptions of his many experiments with the principles of Satya (truth), Ahimsa (non-violence), Religion and Diet. It also charts his journeys through South Africa and India and his dealings with the Governments of the time, pioneering the principle of Satyagraha (mass civil disobedience). There are gaps, however, which was annoying as a reader when the Author declines to describe a particular event, but refers you to another of his books. However, Gandhi writes exquisitely, and his use of language is exemplary. In this respect it was a pleasure to read. Credit must also go to the translator of course, Mahadev Desai.

The theme which resonated most with me was, strangely, his experiments with religion. Strangely, as I'm an atheist. His quest for a better understanding of all religions is admirable. Perhaps if religious leaders all over the world were to be as reasonable and pragmatic as Gandhi, we might not have so many wars based on religion. Gandhi might not have agreed with all principles from every religion, but the very fact that he was willing to acknowledge their existence makes him a better man than most. India and the Indian people have a baffling number of religions and languages. It was interesting to learn a little more about the country at the time, the abject poverty, the politics, the caste system. His philanthropic nature is both bewildering and admirable. He had an inherent need to improve the lives of his fellow countrymen. He certainly was unique and its a shame that there are not more like him in the world today.

Interesting read, 22 Jan 2008
I have read this in the last 12 months and have to say that it is an eye opening book. The sacrifices made, the times it was set in and the general opposition in many countries to many foreigners makes me wonder how one man done so much in one life time.

Its not an easy read in my opinion, but certainly a book that tells it from MK Ghandis side. A book that i wanted to read as an Indian but more importantly as a human who queried how can one man change the world.


Men are mere mortals compared to this man, 25 Sep 2006
My words fail to signify what this man was and still is all about. I can only hope to absorb some of the words handed over to the world from someone who knew what it was all about, he even knew of his impending death. Please accept my words and please make me a better person for having read this book of wonderment.

Everyone should read this book, 06 Jun 2005
In his own words Gandhi takes us through some of the experiences in his life, with each chapter forming at least one important learning lesson to him. All experiences, whether good or bad, had a positive learning lesson on him and contributed to his goal of seeking the truth.

One of his main beliefs was using non-violence as a means of protesting against acts of oppression and using international law to seek justice. This meant he never raised his fists or lowered himself to barbarism however much he was provoked, violated or attacked. In fact this seems to be the opposite attitude demonstrated by all terrorists and most countries (West, Middle East and East) where the belief is that violence and war works. It never has and never will. As Gandhi says "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind".

As we have now entered the third of the world wars, where the weapons are horrific and the consequences unimaginable, Gandhi's words have never been more important. All politicians and world leaders should read this book. In fact everyone should read this book.

This is the book that will give you lots of food for thought, 03 Jul 2000
Gandhi was such a great man with visionary beyond his time. With courage, self-willed and disciplined mind. He was one of a few who can achieved what he did in one life time. I truly enjoyed this book and recommend it to anyone who is searching for the meaning of life.

Surprisingly good attempt to make anarchism seem reasonable, 17 Nov 2008
The author had been an architect and a teacher and this book is a brave attempt to make anarchy seem reasonable.

The author of course dismisses all the pointless assassinations carried out by anarchists in the late nineteennth and early twentieth centuries as mere aberrations.

Although some of his ideas initially sound attractive and plausible a litte thought would soon make one dismisss them as impractable.

Whilst I don't support anarchism, I do however think that our government has become too big and too involved with every aspect of our daily lives. We do need to find a way of getting unnecessary governmental interference and bureaucracy out of our lives.



Provocative,, 21 Oct 2007
Ward quotes Martin Buber: "All forms of government has this in common: each possesses more power than is required by the given conditions." Buber calls this this "political surplus". One only has to look around the world to see how such political surplus is spent.

I was surprised at the extent of anarchist influence. Ward devotes 4 pages to how anarchism functioned practically is Spain in the 1930's, where 3 million people were organized in anarchist communes.

Anarchists have been at the forefront of considering ecological sustainability. Ward cites authors who believe that anarchism is the only approach that can meet the ecological challenges we face.

Given the problems socialism has faced, Ward argues it is too soon to write off anarchism when looking for alternatives to present forms of government. We may have been taught little about anarchism except to be dismissive of it, but Ward's book is an excellent start to understanding what anarchism offers. There are many references to the works of anarchists.

If capitalism seems to work, albeit at a considerable ecological cost, the growing ecological crises may force us within our lifetimes to explore alternative ways of living. Socialism may not be a big enough change, retaining as it does a strong central government with its own political surplus. If you think you can manage more political participation that casting a vote every few years, anarchism may be worth studying.


Self-Publicist and Hoaxer, 18 Dec 2008
Bill Drummond was a man whose career in the late '80s / early '90s centred around making money from novelty records at a time when the pop charts were in the doldrums and ripe for exploitation.

He was, and presumably still is, the last person in the world to destroy his fortune in a cheap stunt. But, he was a very likely person to hoax the popular media into thinking that he had burnt a million quid for the publicity it would, and has continued to, generate.

It is the equivalent today of Simon Cowell declaring he is giving his entire fortune to Oxfam - it simply is not going to happen.

Don't get me wrong, in his time Drummond was brilliant at what he did, but all this talk about the later regret, the psychological effect it had on him, and so on, is all part of his self-publicity and mythologyzing of the event.

I am amazed that the public were suckered so easily. I guess the idea of burning money is an excellent concept to exploit; and we continue to be 'bothered' by it, just as Drummond undoubtedly knew we would be.

Coffee table anarchism - chapter 23, 18 Apr 2007
By 1994, having conquered the charts several times over as the JAMMS, the Timelords and last but not least the KLF (Kopyright liberation Front), Bill Drummond and Jimmy Cauty had accumulated money to burn, and that's exactly what they did. Reincarnated as the K Foundation, they tried to put a million pounds nailed to a board up for auction at a list price of £500,000, but no art dealer would touch it, so they took the money all the way up to the Isle of Jura instead - and burned the lot.

Intended to rock the art establishment and expose its hypocrisy, the ultimate prank backfired when an outraged media and furious public turned on the duo while the art establishment simply pointed and laughed. It appears that while unmade beds and bisected livestock are art, burning money is not. Undaunted, Drummond and Cauty returned with the ashes in a tin and tried to flog those as a work of art, and when that too failed they went on a national tour to show a video of the event and try to make sense of it all. This is the book of the tour of the video of the event and within it is all you need to know about one of the greatest unacknowledged artworks of the late twentieth century.

One day, when the pursuit of money and status are no longer the central aim in life, statues will be erected to these men. In the meantime, if you feel at all sorry for Drummond and Cauty, maybe you should buy this book. And then burn it ;).

Fences and Windows is not a follow up to the bestselling No Logo. Rather it is a collection of articles and speeches written on the hoof at the various conventions and summits around the world in the wake of the mass protests against the World Trade Organisation in Seattle. Klein's involvement with the new grass-roots anti-corporate movement gave her--and thousands of others--a fast-track education in neo-liberal economics and the effects of globalised corporate activities upon landless farmers in Brazil, teachers in Argentina, fast-food workers in Italy, coffee-growers in Mexico, shanty-town dwellers in South Africa, migrant tomato pickers in Florida, union organisers in the Philippines, and homeless kids in Toronto.

One of the most important and inspiring aspects of the book is Klein's description of the ways in which the new movement differs from left-wing political organising of the past. Rather than being unified by a political party or a national network with head offices, annual elections and subordinate cells and locals, it is shaped by the ideas of individual organisations and intellectuals but, crucially, does not defer to any of them as leaders. What facilitates the multiplicity of campaigns is the communication technology which in turn shapes the movement in its own image. What emerged on the streets of Seattle, Klein observes, "was an activist model that mirrors the organic decentralised pathways of the Internet--the Internet come to life".

What gives Klein's analysis added weight is her reports of the tactics of police and security forces around the world in the campaign to criminalise dissent. Among the tactics used are pre-emptive strikes where movement organisers are intimidated before major meetings or simply arrested before they get there. More worrying still is the propaganda war that seeks to blur the distinction between violence and civil disobedience. This in turn leads to a situation where police violence against protesters is normalised and where indiscriminate gassing occurs so frequently that protesters appear on the streets with necessary protective gear of swimming goggles and bandanas soaked in vinegar.

Overall Fences and Windows is engaged, informative, troubling and inspiring. It's also worrying because it's difficult to believe that governments and corporations are allowed to operate such hypocritical and destructive economic policies while passing themselves off as the champions of the very people they are destroying. It's inspiring because there is hope of change--not least in the models of political organisation she describes. In this regard her article on Subcomandante Marcos and the Zapatistas is remarkable and truly inspirational. The inevitable weakness of a collection of articles such as this is that there is inevitable repetition. On the other hand, the fact that Klein wrote them on the move, from the inside and as it happened (or very shortly afterwards) gives the whole urgency and immediacy. --Larry Brown

Noble/Humble, 25 Apr 2007
A line towards the end of the book where Malcolm is in his car and another car pulls up besdies him an a white man peers out saying do you mind shaking hands with a white man and his reply is i'll shake hands with any human being.

If this was only the case even in our present time!!!

The world might have over clouded the race issue but it still exists out there. Such a shame.



black or white? read this!, 22 Jan 2007
Nowadays it is as clear as ever that when the White House wants to take a complex issue and paint it 'black and white' [forgive the pun] you can be sure that there is far more to the issue. Rather than a pantomime villain, rotten to the core, as some would like to portray him, Malcolm X comes across, both in the autobiographical text and the foreward by his friend who transcribed his words, as a man of passion and integrity. Although I myself am white, I think 'noble' is probably the best word to describe my impression of Malcolm X. The point is raised that Dr King appealed to the better-off Blacks and that Malcolm X found more of a following among the most impoverished; a proletariat within a protelariat, you might say. It is a great shame that towards the end of his life, Malcolm X finally came to see that the actions of the White Man and not the White Man per se were the problem, and did not live much longer to give the benefit of his new perspective. He was seen as too moderate for the radicals [ie. Nation of Islam] and vice versa. This book also informs us of the mythology of the Nation of Islam, and its leader Elijah Muhammad, with whom Malcolm X fell out of favour. This book is highly recommended, particularly if you would like to hear the other side of the story.

ultra great.., 28 Jul 2006
I wish i could go for more than 5 stars!
This is a book that you really have to start by reading the 'forward' fully... It will give you a taste of the rest of the book and it will guide through the different stages of Malcolm's life which -trust me- are many and very fascinating...
Malcolm has been very honest and made his visions and philosophies so clear for everyone and he easily admits his mistakes but also strongly adheres to his beliefs... This has made the great man he was... or shall I say he 'is'... In short he is a man who acknowledges his weaknesses but also is proud of his strength...
You will love this book... I know I did.

A MUST READ FOR EVERY HUMAN BEING, 08 Mar 2006
What an amazing book, a guaranteed life changer.
Few men are as great as Malcolm X was, a man who recognises the errors of his ways and then goes about correcting himself knowing full well it could get him killed, that is a true man.

His whole story, from when he was still in his mothers womb to his assassination, is an astounding journey and gives you a real insight on why and how he became what he was and the situation in America and the world at the time. Starting out as a petty criminal then moving to effectively be the main man in the NOI and finally his pilgrimage to Mecca and transformation into a Sunni Muslim, it shows how God works his power and guides those he wishes to guide in ways man can never imagine.

It also shows the great level of intelligence Malcolm X had and how he did more for civil rights with a clean heart than anyone else and was not interested in recognition by the state like certain other leaders, after reading the book your life will be affected in a positive manner for sure.

Brilliant and Sharp, 20 Nov 2005
This book is amazing, not only is it an autobiography but a historical book. This book can give insight to people of this generation about the ways in which black American culture of its time was run, the stuggle in which blacks faced and also about coming to terms with truths even though it may go against what you think. Great read!

Doesn't quite do this profound man the justice he deserves, 24 Jul 2008
Sadly I was a little disappointed with this. After watching Richard Attenborough's epic with Ben Kingsley, I was so inspired that I had to read more about this inspirational man, so I went straight to the library to get his autobiography.

When will I learn?! I'm not a big fan of autobiographies as, no matter how interesting the person, they tend to be dull and tedious, concentrating on the minutiae, rather than the overall bigger picture. As autobiographies go, this is a strange one. It is what it says on the cover - a series of brief descriptions of his many experiments with the principles of Satya (truth), Ahimsa (non-violence), Religion and Diet. It also charts his journeys through South Africa and India and his dealings with the Governments of the time, pioneering the principle of Satyagraha (mass civil disobedience). There are gaps, however, which was annoying as a reader when the Author declines to describe a particular event, but refers you to another of his books. However, Gandhi writes exquisitely, and his use of language is exemplary. In this respect it was a pleasure to read. Credit must also go to the translator of course, Mahadev Desai.

The theme which resonated most with me was, strangely, his experiments with religion. Strangely, as I'm an atheist. His quest for a better understanding of all religions is admirable. Perhaps if religious leaders all over the world were to be as reasonable and pragmatic as Gandhi, we might not have so many wars based on religion. Gandhi might not have agreed with all principles from every religion, but the very fact that he was willing to acknowledge their existence makes him a better man than most. India and the Indian people have a baffling number of religions and languages. It was interesting to learn a little more about the country at the time, the abject poverty, the politics, the caste system. His philanthropic nature is both bewildering and admirable. He had an inherent need to improve the lives of his fellow countrymen. He certainly was unique and its a shame that there are not more like him in the world today.

Interesting read, 22 Jan 2008
I have read this in the last 12 months and have to say that it is an eye opening book. The sacrifices made, the times it was set in and the general opposition in many countries to many foreigners makes me wonder how one man done so much in one life time.

Its not an easy read in my opinion, but certainly a book that tells it from MK Ghandis side. A book that i wanted to read as an Indian but more importantly as a human who queried how can one man change the world.


Men are mere mortals compared to this man, 25 Sep 2006
My words fail to signify what this man was and still is all about. I can only hope to absorb some of the words handed over to the world from someone who knew what it was all about, he even knew of his impending death. Please accept my words and please make me a better person for having read this book of wonderment.

Everyone should read this book, 06 Jun 2005
In his own words Gandhi takes us through some of the experiences in his life, with each chapter forming at least one important learning lesson to him. All experiences, whether good or bad, had a positive learning lesson on him and contributed to his goal of seeking the truth.

One of his main beliefs was using non-violence as a means of protesting against acts of oppression and using international law to seek justice. This meant he never raised his fists or lowered himself to barbarism however much he was provoked, violated or attacked. In fact this seems to be the opposite attitude demonstrated by all terrorists and most countries (West, Middle East and East) where the belief is that violence and war works. It never has and never will. As Gandhi says "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind".

As we have now entered the third of the world wars, where the weapons are horrific and the consequences unimaginable, Gandhi's words have never been more important. All politicians and world leaders should read this book. In fact everyone should read this book.

This is the book that will give you lots of food for thought, 03 Jul 2000
Gandhi was such a great man with visionary beyond his time. With courage, self-willed and disciplined mind. He was one of a few who can achieved what he did in one life time. I truly enjoyed this book and recommend it to anyone who is searching for the meaning of life.

Surprisingly good attempt to make anarchism seem reasonable, 17 Nov 2008
The author had been an architect and a teacher and this book is a brave attempt to make anarchy seem reasonable.

The author of course dismisses all the pointless assassinations carried out by anarchists in the late nineteennth and early twentieth centuries as mere aberrations.

Although some of his ideas initially sound attractive and plausible a litte thought would soon make one dismisss them as impractable.

Whilst I don't support anarchism, I do however think that our government has become too big and too involved with every aspect of our daily lives. We do need to find a way of getting unnecessary governmental interference and bureaucracy out of our lives.



Provocative,, 21 Oct 2007
Ward quotes Martin Buber: "All forms of government has this in common: each possesses more power than is required by the given conditions." Buber calls this this "political surplus". One only has to look around the world to see how such political surplus is spent.

I was surprised at the extent of anarchist influence. Ward devotes 4 pages to how anarchism functioned practically is Spain in the 1930's, where 3 million people were organized in anarchist communes.

Anarchists have been at the forefront of considering ecological sustainability. Ward cites authors who believe that anarchism is the only approach that can meet the ecological challenges we face.

Given the problems socialism has faced, Ward argues it is too soon to write off anarchism when looking for alternatives to present forms of government. We may have been taught little about anarchism except to be dismissive of it, but Ward's book is an excellent start to understanding what anarchism offers. There are many references to the works of anarchists.

If capitalism seems to work, albeit at a considerable ecological cost, the growing ecological crises may force us within our lifetimes to explore alternative ways of living. Socialism may not be a big enough change, retaining as it does a strong central government with its own political surplus. If you think you can manage more political participation that casting a vote every few years, anarchism may be worth studying.


Self-Publicist and Hoaxer, 18 Dec 2008
Bill Drummond was a man whose career in the late '80s / early '90s centred around making money from novelty records at a time when the pop charts were in the doldrums and ripe for exploitation.

He was, and presumably still is, the last person in the world to destroy his fortune in a cheap stunt. But, he was a very likely person to hoax the popular media into thinking that he had burnt a million quid for the publicity it would, and has continued to, generate.

It is the equivalent today of Simon Cowell declaring he is giving his entire fortune to Oxfam - it simply is not going to happen.

Don't get me wrong, in his time Drummond was brilliant at what he did, but all this talk about the later regret, the psychological effect it had on him, and so on, is all part of his self-publicity and mythologyzing of the event.

I am amazed that the public were suckered so easily. I guess the idea of burning money is an excellent concept to exploit; and we continue to be 'bothered' by it, just as Drummond undoubtedly knew we would be.

Coffee table anarchism - chapter 23, 18 Apr 2007
By 1994, having conquered the charts several times over as the JAMMS, the Timelords and last but not least the KLF (Kopyright liberation Front), Bill Drummond and Jimmy Cauty had accumulated money to burn, and that's exactly what they did. Reincarnated as the K Foundation, they tried to put a million pounds nailed to a board up for auction at a list price of £500,000, but no art dealer would touch it, so they took the money all the way up to the Isle of Jura instead - and burned the lot.

Intended to rock the art establishment and expose its hypocrisy, the ultimate prank backfired when an outraged media and furious public turned on the duo while the art establishment simply pointed and laughed. It appears that while unmade beds and bisected livestock are art, burning money is not. Undaunted, Drummond and Cauty returned with the ashes in a tin and tried to flog those as a work of art, and when that too failed they went on a national tour to show a video of the event and try to make sense of it all. This is the book of the tour of the video of the event and within it is all you need to know about one of the greatest unacknowledged artworks of the late twentieth century.

One day, when the pursuit of money and status are no longer the central aim in life, statues will be erected to these men. In the meantime, if you feel at all sorry for Drummond and Cauty, maybe you should buy this book. And then burn it ;).

Real democracy is always demanded, never granted, 03 Jul 2008
This book contains superb comments on strategies, policies and mass demonstrations against the actual way of the world. It poses the right questions (who holds power? who exercises it? who disguises it?) and the right answers (people before profits).

The way of the world
For Naomi Klein, the world is dominated by transnational corporations and investors, who control governments. These governments respond to the needs of the former, not of the people who elected them: affordable housing, medicines, clean water, clean land, basic food, education, sustainable energy sources and independent scientific research.
As someone in Prague said, `communism and capitalism have something in common. They both centralize power in the hands of a few.' Globalization and free trade are corporate-driven. The wealth liberated by them is stuck at the top. For the rest, there is wage stagnation, erosion of basic services, of freedom and civil liberties.

Strategies
Resistance to biased free trade and its globalization should not occur within a big unified movement, a coordinated centralization, because it would in the shortest of time being `incorporated by special interests'. Small units of activists, independent groups should focus on simple, crucial issues. Only those can be effective.

Policies
The policies should focus on the application of universal human rights, real democracy, labor and ecological rights and records, civil liberties, freedom of speech (internet) and independent research (e.g., Frankenstein food).
The IMF(ired) and the World Bank should fiercely be attacked or their doctrine, which takes power away from communities, give it to a central government, who gives it to the corporations through privatization (V.Shiva).
Another target should be the WTO, which dead seriously makes trade-related intellectual property rights its focus point in the face of billions of hungry people.

This extremely hard-hitting book (`for Kamikaze Capitalists, terrorism is just another opportunity to leverage') is a must read for all those wanting to save the planet and mankind.


Klein's update on the anti-Corporate Globalisation battle, 21 Mar 2005
This is a collection of articles published in various journals over the last couple of years which succeeds in giving a sense of history-in-the-making, of a movement (albeit in a very loose sense of the word) finding its voice and occasionally being heard. The depiction of both the "broad brush" international trends- whether political or corporate- are succinctly done, and are very impressively and insightfully linked to the 'grass roots' situations and people 'on the ground' affected by such forces. That the voices of real people affected by the impact of such forces- both good, but more often bad- are so seldom heard or listened to in the mainstream media makes this collection feel important.

Klein's ability to present complex developments and arguments in a succinct way- many chapters are only four pages long- is impressive.

The author's previous book, the excellent No Logo, retains its important place in the canon of writing on anti-corporate globalisation, but Fences and Windows can sit proudly alongside.

Not her best writing, 18 Feb 2004
There's a distinctly disjointed feel to 'Fences and Windows', Naomi Klein's update on globalisation after her bestseller 'No Logo' of a few years ago. It's made up of various articles she wrote between 2000 and 2002, many of which seem to have been published before (several in the Canadian newspaper 'The Globe and Mail'). Such journalistic writing is fine for a newspaper that readers will discard the next day, but it lacks the substance required of a book. The particular problem is length - most of the chapters are no more than half a dozen pages long, so of course there isn't enough space in which to develop much of an argument, or even look at the topics in much depth. She's also not saying anything stunningly new (except in the final section), which makes for a frustrating read.

She begins by detailing the major anti-globalisation protests, such as Washington DC (2000), then moves on to how 'free trade' (which she very correctly points out isn't actually 'free' at all) and the global market are 'dismantling democracy'. This is definitely the weakest part of the book; there's a strong argument to be made here, but the disparate articles don't make the necessary links to have any force. Next she deals with 'criminalising dissent' - how protestors are mistreated and misrepresented by the authorities. Again, more structure here would help, but it's still a useful way to learn of specific examples.

The fourth section, 'Capitalising on Terror' does much as the title suggests, reasonably efficiently, but it's the fifth and final one that makes this book worth reading. It's rather a cliché for books of this sort to end with how the protestors want to build a better world, but Klein takes a tangent to this issue with great effect. She examines the methods used by protest groups, and assesses their effectiveness with the sort of insightful critique only someone who's part of the movement could provide. Her article on Subcommandante Marcos and the Zapatistas in Chiapas, Mexico is fantastic and alone justifies buying this book. (That it's the longest in the book, at a whole 16 pages, is significant - it was also originally in 'The Guardian' on 3rd March 2001, if you want to search the archives for it instead!).

I'm studying globalisation, and even allowing for the fact that Klein isn't an academic author, her lack of citation of other authors and other people's ideas is distinctly frustrating. The index is comprehensive and useful, but there are no endnotes and meagre credits. Unfortunately this isn't a book that leads you on to further exploration. If you haven't read 'No Logo', do so now and ignore this. 'Fences and Windows' is only worth buying if you're a bit of a fan of the author, or are some anti-globalisation popular lit. completist... Borrow this from the library if you must; don't buy. Get the 'Rebellion in Chiapas' article elsewhere, and do something better with your time.

Too Superfiicial, 05 Jan 2004
Fences and Windows, as Naomi Klein states, is not a sequel to "No Logo". Rather, it is a collection of speeches and articles compiled by her over the last few years.

Therein lies the problem with this book. For someone wanting a thorough insight into the trends of the 'globalisation debate' this book offers very very little subject matter. Considering how all the writings are magazine articles subjects are covered with very little depth, and no real insight or analysis.

I found the book tedious after a while and repetitive, as many of the articles overlap. Also, since the articles are not in chronological order throughout, you find yourself revisiting the same summits and debates, with no additional information/understanding.

A much better insight, in my opinion, would be Paul Kingsnorth's "One No, Many Yeses". This book truly offered and original and objective approach to the movement.

A nice follow up, 10 Aug 2003
This was nice follow up to the much talked about No Logo. I enjoyed the read, but it left me with much less than the predecessor did. Although this is an interesting look at the globalisation movement, and possibly a good introduction to it for people who have read No Logo (which was missing a lot of exploration in that area.) I felt slightly underwhelmed by it all. It also didn't give me much hope at the movement until towards the end.

Klein is a great jornalist, and what she lacks in academic writing, she makes up for in passion. I would be reading her writings in the Globe and Mail if I lived in Canada, and she's a great wake up call to new potential activists, but her lack of depth can be off putting for old hands, I'm sure.

However, the problem with politics is it's often unrelenting affect of induced boredom over the readers. Klein doesn't do that at all. For more of the style, with a bit more focus on middle class westerners, and the social effects of Branding, you could try Branded by Alicia Quart. That's probably a bit more relavant to youngsters who really feel like they are caught up in the whole thing. It's very difficult to break out of the branded boxes that teens sit in these days, but if anyone can inspire, Naomi can.

Noble/Humble, 25 Apr 2007
A line towards the end of the book where Malcolm is in his car and another car pulls up besdies him an a white man peers out saying do you mind shaking hands with a white man and his reply is i'll shake hands with any human being.

If this was only the case even in our present time!!!

The world might have over clouded the race issue but it still exists out there. Such a shame.



black or white? read this!, 22 Jan 2007
Nowadays it is as clear as ever that when the White House wants to take a complex issue and paint it 'black and white' [forgive the pun] you can be sure that there is far more to the issue. Rather than a pantomime villain, rotten to the core, as some would like to portray him, Malcolm X comes across, both in the autobiographical text and the foreward by his friend who transcribed his words, as a man of passion and integrity. Although I myself am white, I think 'noble' is probably the best word to describe my impression of Malcolm X. The point is raised that Dr King appealed to the better-off Blacks and that Malcolm X found more of a following among the most impoverished; a proletariat within a protelariat, you might say. It is a great shame that towards the end of his life, Malcolm X finally came to see that the actions of the White Man and not the White Man per se were the problem, and did not live much longer to give the benefit of his new perspective. He was seen as too moderate for the radicals [ie. Nation of Islam] and vice versa. This book also informs us of the mythology of the Nation of Islam, and its leader Elijah Muhammad, with whom Malcolm X fell out of favour. This book is highly recommended, particularly if you would like to hear the other side of the story.

ultra great.., 28 Jul 2006
I wish i could go for more than 5 stars!
This is a book that you really have to start by reading the 'forward' fully... It will give you a taste of the rest of the book and it will guide through the different stages of Malcolm's life which -trust me- are many and very fascinating...
Malcolm has been very honest and made his visions and philosophies so clear for everyone and he easily admits his mistakes but also strongly adheres to his beliefs... This has made the great man he was... or shall I say he 'is'... In short he is a man who acknowledges his weaknesses but also is proud of his strength...
You will love this book... I know I did.

A MUST READ FOR EVERY HUMAN BEING, 08 Mar 2006
What an amazing book, a guaranteed life changer.
Few men are as great as Malcolm X was, a man who recognises the errors of his ways and then goes about correcting himself knowing full well it could get him killed, that is a true man.

His whole story, from when he was still in his mothers womb to his assassination, is an astounding journey and gives you a real insight on why and how he became what he was and the situation in America and the world at the time. Starting out as a petty criminal then moving to effectively be the main man in the NOI and finally his pilgrimage to Mecca and transformation into a Sunni Muslim, it shows how God works his power and guides those he wishes to guide in ways man can never imagine.

It also shows the great level of intelligence Malcolm X had and how he did more for civil rights with a clean heart than anyone else and was not interested in recognition by the state like certain other leaders, after reading the book your life will be affected in a positive manner for sure.

Brilliant and Sharp, 20 Nov 2005
This book is amazing, not only is it an autobiography but a historical book. This book can give insight to people of this generation about the ways in which black American culture of its time was run, the stuggle in which blacks faced and also about coming to terms with truths even though it may go against what you think. Great read!

Doesn't quite do this profound man the justice he deserves, 24 Jul 2008
Sadly I was a little disappointed with this. After watching Richard Attenborough's epic with Ben Kingsley, I was so inspired that I had to read more about this inspirational man, so I went straight to the library to get his autobiography.

When will I learn?! I'm not a big fan of autobiographies as, no matter how interesting the person, they tend to be dull and tedious, concentrating on the minutiae, rather than the overall bigger picture. As autobiographies go, this is a strange one. It is what it says on the cover - a series of brief descriptions of his many experiments with the principles of Satya (truth), Ahimsa (non-violence), Religion and Diet. It also charts his journeys through South Africa and India and his dealings with the Governments of the time, pioneering the principle of Satyagraha (mass civil disobedience). There are gaps, however, which was annoying as a reader when the Author declines to describe a particular event, but refers you to another of his books. However, Gandhi writes exquisitely, and his use of language is exemplary. In this respect it was a pleasure to read. Credit must also go to the translator of course, Mahadev Desai.

The theme which resonated most with me was, strangely, his experiments with religion. Strangely, as I'm an atheist. His quest for a better understanding of all religions is admirable. Perhaps if religious leaders all over the world were to be as reasonable and pragmatic as Gandhi, we might not have so many wars based on religion. Gandhi might not have agreed with all principles from every religion, but the very fact that he was willing to acknowledge their existence makes him a better man than most. India and the Indian people have a baffling number of religions and languages. It was interesting to learn a little more about the country at the time, the abject poverty, the politics, the caste system. His philanthropic nature is both bewildering and admirable. He had an inherent need to improve the lives of his fellow countrymen. He certainly was unique and its a shame that there are not more like him in the world today.

Interesting read, 22 Jan 2008
I have read this in the last 12 months and have to say that it is an eye opening book. The sacrifices made, the times it was set in and the general opposition in many countries to many foreigners makes me wonder how one man done so much in one life time.

Its not an easy read in my opinion, but certainly a book that tells it from MK Ghandis side. A book that i wanted to read as an Indian but more importantly as a human who queried how can one man change the world.


Men are mere mortals compared to this man, 25 Sep 2006
My words fail to signify what this man was and still is all about. I can only hope to absorb some of the words handed over to the world from someone who knew what it was all about, he even knew of his impending death. Please accept my words and please make me a better person for having read this book of wonderment.

Everyone should read this book, 06 Jun 2005
In his own words Gandhi takes us through some of the experiences in his life, with each chapter forming at least one important learning lesson to him. All experiences, whether good or bad, had a positive learning lesson on him and contributed to his goal of seeking the truth.

One of his main beliefs was using non-violence as a means of protesting against acts of oppression and using international law to seek justice. This meant he never raised his fists or lowered himself to barbarism however much he was provoked, violated or attacked. In fact this seems to be the opposite attitude demonstrated by all terrorists and most countries (West, Middle East and East) where the belief is that violence and war works. It never has and never will. As Gandhi says "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind".

As we have now entered the third of the world wars, where the weapons are horrific and the consequences unimaginable, Gandhi's words have never been more important. All politicians and world leaders should read this book. In fact everyone should read this book.

This is the book that will give you lots of food for thought, 03 Jul 2000
Gandhi was such a great man with visionary beyond his time. With courage, self-willed and disciplined mind. He was one of a few who can achieved what he did in one life time. I truly enjoyed this book and recommend it to anyone who is searching for the meaning of life.

Surprisingly good attempt to make anarchism seem reasonable, 17 Nov 2008
The author had been an architect and a teacher and this book is a brave attempt to make anarchy seem reasonable.

The author of course dismisses all the pointless assassinations carried out by anarchists in the late nineteennth and early twentieth centuries as mere aberrations.

Although some of his ideas initially sound attractive and plausible a litte thought would soon make one dismisss them as impractable.

Whilst I don't support anarchism, I do however think that our government has become too big and too involved with every aspect of our daily lives. We do need to find a way of getting unnecessary governmental interference and bureaucracy out of our lives.



Provocative,, 21 Oct 2007
Ward quotes Martin Buber: "All forms of government has this in common: each possesses more power than is required by the given conditions." Buber calls this this "political surplus". One only has to look around the world to see how such political surplus is spent.

I was surprised at the extent of anarchist influence. Ward devotes 4 pages to how anarchism functioned practically is Spain in the 1930's, where 3 million people were organized in anarchist communes.

Anarchists have been at the forefront of considering ecological sustainability. Ward cites authors who believe that anarchism is the only approach that can meet the ecological challenges we face.

Given the problems socialism has faced, Ward argues it is too soon to write off anarchism when looking for alternatives to present forms of government. We may have been taught little about anarchism except to be dismissive of it, but Ward's book is an excellent start to understanding what anarchism offers. There are many references to the works of anarchists.

If capitalism seems to work, albeit at a considerable ecological cost, the growing ecological crises may force us within our lifetimes to explore alternative ways of living. Socialism may not be a big enough change, retaining as it does a strong central government with its own political surplus. If you think you can manage more political participation that casting a vote every few years, anarchism may be worth studying.


Self-Publicist and Hoaxer, 18 Dec 2008
Bill Drummond was a man whose career in the late '80s / early '90s centred around making money from novelty records at a time when the pop charts were in the doldrums and ripe for exploitation.

He was, and presumably still is, the last person in the world to destroy his fortune in a cheap stunt. But, he was a very likely person to hoax the popular media into thinking that he had burnt a million quid for the publicity it would, and has continued to, generate.

It is the equivalent today of Simon Cowell declaring he is giving his entire fortune to Oxfam - it simply is not going to happen.

Don't get me wrong, in his time Drummond was brilliant at what he did, but all this talk about the later regret, the psychological effect it had on him, and so on, is all part of his self-publicity and mythologyzing of the event.

I am amazed that the public were suckered so easily. I guess the idea of burning money is an excellent concept to exploit; and we continue to be 'bothered' by it, just as Drummond undoubtedly knew we would be.

Coffee table anarchism - chapter 23, 18 Apr 2007
By 1994, having conquered the charts several times over as the JAMMS, the Timelords and last but not least the KLF (Kopyright liberation Front), Bill Drummond and Jimmy Cauty had accumulated money to burn, and that's exactly what they did. Reincarnated as the K Foundation, they tried to put a million pounds nailed to a board up for auction at a list price of £500,000, but no art dealer would touch it, so they took the money all the way up to the Isle of Jura instead - and burned the lot.

Intended to rock the art establishment and expose its hypocrisy, the ultimate prank backfired when an outraged media and furious public turned on the duo while the art establishment simply pointed and laughed. It appears that while unmade beds and bisected livestock are art, burning money is not. Undaunted, Drummond and Cauty returned with the ashes in a tin and tried to flog those as a work of art, and when that too failed they went on a national tour to show a video of the event and try to make sense of it all. This is the book of the tour of the video of the event and within it is all you need to know about one of the greatest unacknowledged artworks of the late twentieth century.

One day, when the pursuit of money and status are no longer the central aim in life, statues will be erected to these men. In the meantime, if you feel at all sorry for Drummond and Cauty, maybe you should buy this book. And then burn it ;).

Real democracy is always demanded, never granted, 03 Jul 2008
This book contains superb comments on strategies, policies and mass demonstrations against the actual way of the world. It poses the right questions (who holds power? who exercises it? who disguises it?) and the right answers (people before profits).

The way of the world
For Naomi Klein, the world is dominated by transnational corporations and investors, who control governments. These governments respond to the needs of the former, not of the people who elected them: affordable housing, medicines, clean water, clean land, basic food, education, sustainable energy sources and independent scientific research.
As someone in Prague said, `communism and capitalism have something in common. They both centralize power in the hands of a few.' Globalization and free trade are corporate-driven. The wealth liberated by them is stuck at the top. For the rest, there is wage stagnation, erosion of basic services, of freedom and civil liberties.

Strategies
Resistance to biased free trade and its globalization should not occur within a big unified movement, a coordinated centralization, because it would in the shortest of time being `incorporated by special interests'. Small units of activists, independent groups should focus on simple, crucial issues. Only those can be effective.

Policies
The policies should focus on the application of universal human rights, real democracy, labor and ecological rights and records, civil liberties, freedom of speech (internet) and independent research (e.g., Frankenstein food).
The IMF(ired) and the World Bank should fiercely be attacked or their doctrine, which takes power away from communities, give it to a central government, who gives it to the corporations through privatization (V.Shiva).
Another target should be the WTO, which dead seriously makes trade-related intellectual property rights its focus point in the face of billions of hungry people.

This extremely hard-hitting book (`for Kamikaze Capitalists, terrorism is just another opportunity to leverage') is a must read for all those wanting to save the planet and mankind.


Klein's update on the anti-Corporate Globalisation battle, 21 Mar 2005
This is a collection of articles published in various journals over the last couple of years which succeeds in giving a sense of history-in-the-making, of a movement (albeit in a very loose sense of the word) finding its voice and occasionally being heard. The depiction of both the "broad brush" international trends- whether political or corporate- are succinctly done, and are very impressively and insightfully linked to the 'grass roots' situations and people 'on the ground' affected by such forces. That the voices of real people affected by the impact of such forces- both good, but more often bad- are so seldom heard or listened to in the mainstream media makes this collection feel important.

Klein's ability to present complex developments and arguments in a succinct way- many chapters are only four pages long- is impressive.

The author's previous book, the excellent No Logo, retains its important place in the canon of writing on anti-corporate globalisation, but Fences and Windows can sit proudly alongside.

Not her best writing, 18 Feb 2004
There's a distinctly disjointed feel to 'Fences and Windows', Naomi Klein's update on globalisation after her bestseller 'No Logo' of a few years ago. It's made up of various articles she wrote between 2000 and 2002, many of which seem to have been published before (several in the Canadian newspaper 'The Globe and Mail'). Such journalistic writing is fine for a newspaper that readers will discard the next day, but it lacks the substance required of a book. The particular problem is length - most of the chapters are no more than half a dozen pages long, so of course there isn't enough space in which to develop much of an argument, or even look at the topics in much depth. She's also not saying anything stunningly new (except in the final section), which makes for a frustrating read.

She begins by detailing the major anti-globalisation protests, such as Washington DC (2000), then moves on to how 'free trade' (which she very correctly points out isn't actually 'free' at all) and the global market are 'dismantling democracy'. This is definitely the weakest part of the book; there's a strong argument to be made here, but the disparate articles don't make the necessary links to have any force. Next she deals with 'criminalising dissent' - how protestors are mistreated and misrepresented by the authorities. Again, more structure here would help, but it's still a useful way to learn of specific examples.

The fourth section, 'Capitalising on Terror' does much as the title suggests, reasonably efficiently, but it's the fifth and final one that makes this book worth reading. It's rather a cliché for books of this sort to end with how the protestors want to build a better world, but Klein takes a tangent to this issue with great effect. She examines the methods used by protest groups, and assesses their effectiveness with the sort of insightful critique only someone who's part of the movement could provide. Her article on Subcommandante Marcos and the Zapatistas in Chiapas, Mexico is fantastic and alone justifies buying this book. (That it's the longest in the book, at a whole 16 pages, is significant - it was also originally in 'The Guardian' on 3rd March 2001, if you want to search the archives for it instead!).

I'm studying globalisation, and even allowing for the fact that Klein isn't an academic author, her lack of citation of other authors and other people's ideas is distinctly frustrating. The index is comprehensive and useful, but there are no endnotes and meagre credits. Unfortunately this isn't a book that leads you on to further exploration. If you haven't read 'No Logo', do so now and ignore this. 'Fences and Windows' is only worth buying if you're a bit of a fan of the author, or are some anti-globalisation popular lit. completist... Borrow this from the library if you must; don't buy. Get the 'Rebellion in Chiapas' article elsewhere, and do something better with your time.

Too Superfiicial, 05 Jan 2004
Fences and Windows, as Naomi Klein states, is not a sequel to "No Logo". Rather, it is a collection of speeches and articles compiled by her over the last few years.

Therein lies the problem with this book. For someone wanting a thorough insight into the trends of the 'globalisation debate' this book offers very very little subject matter. Considering how all the writings are magazine articles subjects are covered with very little depth, and no real insight or analysis.

I found the book tedious after a while and repetitive, as many of the articles overlap. Also, since the articles are not in chronological order throughout, you find yourself revisiting the same summits and debates, with no additional information/understanding.

A much better insight, in my opinion, would be Paul Kingsnorth's "One No, Many Yeses". This book truly offered and original and objective approach to the movement.

A nice follow up, 10 Aug 2003
This was nice follow up to the much talked about No Logo. I enjoyed the read, but it left me with much less than the predecessor did. Although this is an interesting look at the globalisation movement, and possibly a good introduction to it for people who have read No Logo (which was missing a lot of exploration in that area.) I felt slightly underwhelmed by it all. It also didn't give me much hope at the movement until towards the end.

Klein is a great jornalist, and what she lacks in academic writing, she makes up for in passion. I would be reading her writings in the Globe and Mail if I lived in Canada, and she's a great wake up call to new potential activists, but her lack of depth can be off putting for old hands, I'm sure.

However, the problem with politics is it's often unrelenting affect of induced boredom over the readers. Klein doesn't do that at all. For more of the style, with a bit more focus on middle class westerners, and the social effects of Branding, you could try Branded by Alicia Quart. That's probably a bit more relavant to youngsters who really feel like they are caught up in the whole thing. It's very difficult to break out of the branded boxes that teens sit in these days, but if anyone can inspire, Naomi can.

A remarkable book by a remarkable woman., 03 Jan 2006
Aung San Suu Kyi has spent most of the time since her party's landslide election victory in 1990 under house arrest. Yet this remarkable woman refuses to hate or fear the kleptocratic regime that keeps her there. Instead she preaches peaceful revolution and reconcilliation and points to the example of Mahatmar Ghandi.

READ THIS BOOK and pass it on or recommend it so that the world can see and revere the courage, fortitude and above all dignity of the worlds ONLY imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize winner.

Noble/Humble, 25 Apr 2007
A line towards the end of the book where Malcolm is in his car and another car pulls up besdies him an a white man peers out saying do you mind shaking hands with a white man and his reply is i'll shake hands with any human being.

If this was only the case even in our present time!!!

The world might have over clouded the race issue but it still exists out there. Such a shame.



black or white? read this!, 22 Jan 2007
Nowadays it is as clear as ever that when the White House wants to take a complex issue and paint it 'black and white' [forgive the pun] you can be sure that there is far more to the issue. Rather than a pantomime villain, rotten to the core, as some would like to portray him, Malcolm X comes across, both in the autobiographical text and the foreward by his friend who transcribed his words, as a man of passion and integrity. Although I myself am white, I think 'noble' is probably the best word to describe my impression of Malcolm X. The point is raised that Dr King appealed to the better-off Blacks and that Malcolm X found more of a following among the most impoverished; a proletariat within a protelariat, you might say. It is a great shame that towards the end of his life, Malcolm X finally came to see that the actions of the White Man and not the White Man per se were the problem, and did not live much longer to give the benefit of his new perspective. He was seen as too moderate for the radicals [ie. Nation of Islam] and vice versa. This book also informs us of the mythology of the Nation of Islam, and its leader Elijah Muhammad, with whom Malcolm X fell out of favour. This book is highly recommended, particularly if you would like to hear the other side of the story.

ultra great.., 28 Jul 2006
I wish i could go for more than 5 stars!
This is a book that you really have to start by reading the 'forward' fully... It will give you a taste of the rest of the book and it will guide through the different stages of Malcolm's life which -trust me- are many and very fascinating...
Malcolm has been very honest and made his visions and philosophies so clear for everyone and he easily admits his mistakes but also strongly adheres to his beliefs... This has made the great man he was... or shall I say he 'is'... In short he is a man who acknowledges his weaknesses but also is proud of his strength...
You will love this book... I know I did.

A MUST READ FOR EVERY HUMAN BEING, 08 Mar 2006
What an amazing book, a guaranteed life changer.
Few men are as great as Malcolm X was, a man who recognises the errors of his ways and then goes about correcting himself knowing full well it could get him killed, that is a true man.

His whole story, from when he was still in his mothers womb to his assassination, is an astounding journey and gives you a real insight on why and how he became what he was and the situation in America and the world at the time. Starting out as a petty criminal then moving to effectively be the main man in the NOI and finally his pilgrimage to Mecca and transformation into a Sunni Muslim, it shows how God works his power and guides those he wishes to guide in ways man can never imagine.

It also shows the great level of intelligence Malcolm X had and how he did more for civil rights with a clean heart than anyone else and was not interested in recognition by the state like certain other leaders, after reading the book your life will be affected in a positive manner for sure.

Brilliant and Sharp, 20 Nov 2005
This book is amazing, not only is it an autobiography but a historical book. This book can give insight to people of this generation about the ways in which black American culture of its time was run, the stuggle in which blacks faced and also about coming to terms with truths even though it may go against what you think. Great read!

Doesn't quite do this profound man the justice he deserves, 24 Jul 2008
Sadly I was a little disappointed with this. After watching Richard Attenborough's epic with Ben Kingsley, I was so inspired that I had to read more about this inspirational man, so I went straight to the library to get his autobiography.

When will I learn?! I'm not a big fan of autobiographies as, no matter how interesting the person, they tend to be dull and tedious, concentrating on the minutiae, rather than the overall bigger picture. As autobiographies go, this is a strange one. It is what it says on the cover - a series of brief descriptions of his many experiments with the principles of Satya (truth), Ahimsa (non-violence), Religion and Diet. It also charts his journeys through South Africa and India and his dealings with the Governments of the time, pioneering the principle of Satyagraha (mass civil disobedience). There are gaps, however, which was annoying as a reader when the Author declines to describe a particular event, but refers you to another of his books. However, Gandhi writes exquisitely, and his use of language is exemplary. In this respect it was a pleasure to read. Credit must also go to the translator of course, Mahadev Desai.

The theme which resonated most with me was, strangely, his experiments with religion. Strangely, as I'm an atheist. His quest for a better understanding of all religions is admirable. Perhaps if religious leaders all over the world were to be as reasonable and pragmatic as Gandhi, we might not have so many wars based on religion. Gandhi might not have agreed with all principles from every religion, but the very fact that he was willing to acknowledge their existence makes him a better man than most. India and the Indian people have a baffling number of religions and languages. It was interesting to learn a little more about the country at the time, the abject poverty, the politics, the caste system. His philanthropic nature is both bewildering and admirable. He had an inherent need to improve the lives of his fellow countrymen. He certainly was unique and its a shame that there are not more like him in the world today.

Interesting read, 22 Jan 2008
I have read this in the last 12 months and have to say that it is an eye opening book. The sacrifices made, the times it was set in and the general opposition in many countries to many foreigners makes me wonder how one man done so much in one life time.

Its not an easy read in my opinion, but certainly a book that tells it from MK Ghandis side. A book that i wanted to read as an Indian but more importantly as a human who queried how can one man change the world.


Men are mere mortals compared to this man, 25 Sep 2006
My words fail to signify what this man was and still is all about. I can only hope to absorb some of the words handed over to the world from someone who knew what it was all about, he even knew of his impending death. Please accept my words and please make me a better person for having read this book of wonderment.

Everyone should read this book, 06 Jun 2005
In his own words Gandhi takes us through some of the experiences in his life, with each chapter forming at least one important learning lesson to him. All experiences, whether good or bad, had a positive learning lesson on him and contributed to his goal of seeking the truth.

One of his main beliefs was using non-violence as a means of protesting against acts of oppression and using international law to seek justice. This meant he never raised his fists or lowered himself to barbarism however much he was provoked, violated or attacked. In fact this seems to be the opposite attitude demonstrated by all terrorists and most countries (West, Middle East and East) where the belief is that violence and war works. It never has and never will. As Gandhi says "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind".

As we have now entered the third of the world wars, where the weapons are horrific and the consequences unimaginable, Gandhi's words have never been more important. All politicians and world leaders should read this book. In fact everyone should read this book.

This is the book that will give you lots of food for thought, 03 Jul 2000
Gandhi was such a great man with visionary beyond his time. With courage, self-willed and disciplined mind. He was one of a few who can achieved what he did in one life time. I truly enjoyed this book and recommend it to anyone who is searching for the meaning of life.

Surprisingly good attempt to make anarchism seem reasonable, 17 Nov 2008
The author had been an architect and a teacher and this book is a brave attempt to make anarchy seem reasonable.

The author of course dismisses all the pointless assassinations carried out by anarchists in the late nineteennth and early twentieth centuries as mere aberrations.

Although some of his ideas initially sound attractive and plausible a litte thought would soon make one dismisss them as impractable.

Whilst I don't support anarchism, I do however think that our government has become too big and too involved with every aspect of our daily lives. We do need to find a way of getting unnecessary governmental interference and bureaucracy out of our lives.



Provocative,, 21 Oct 2007
Ward quotes Martin Buber: "All forms of government has this in common: each possesses more power than is required by the given conditions." Buber calls this this "political surplus". One only has to look around the world to see how such political surplus is spent.

I was surprised at the extent of anarchist influence. Ward devotes 4 pages to how anarchism functioned practically is Spain in the 1930's, where 3 million people were organized in anarchist communes.

Anarchists have been at the forefront of considering ecological sustainability. Ward cites authors who believe that anarchism is the only approach that can meet the ecological challenges we face.

Given the problems socialism has faced, Ward argues it is too soon to write off anarchism when looking for alternatives to present f