thank you graham hancock, 16 Dec 2007
you do the general public a great service by questioning the mainstream of historians views on civilisations and well history on a whole, i found this book fantastic enlightening scary questionable but most importantly solid his works are well studied and seen first hand. and it will make you re think the history of human civilisation. i for one admire people like graham hancock who arnt afraid to push the bounderies of the incredible acheivments our ancient ancestors discoverd and built where as the mainstream comunity describe them as un civilised barbarians. i recomend this book to every human beign on the planet.

Great entertainment, 29 Jul 2007
Whether you subscribe to Hancock's theories or not, there is no denying that this is an excellent read, thoroughly well-researched and written in an engaging and involving way.

Personally, I felt that the book should have sought to ask some of its questions without then feeling the need to speculate wildly to answer them. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating read and this new edition is worth the money even if you have the original.

General Comment, 05 Dec 2006
The Antikythera Mechanism to reveiwed on C4 12th DECEMBER
has only now been deciphered in its working. This is a mechanism which is over 2000 years old, Hancock will be over the moon about something that according to some little grey cells could never exist.....

Good Hokum, 24 Jul 2006
Firstly the author is a journalist by trade and not an academic historian. Many of the suppositions are based on dubious or discredited sources and are made to fit the author's theories.

The book starts with ancient maps apparently accurately showing Antarctica which wasn't supposed to have been discovered till 1818. This includes the famous Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513 whose author claims it was based on reconstructions of ancient maps, omitting the copying errors (although there is no evidence of these supposed copying errors). The Piri Reis map itself is grossly inaccurate and its sources may only date to the 14th or 15th century and not Hancock's mythical date of 10,500BC. The coastline is vaguely accurate but the interior was probably imaginary as was often the case in this era.

Hancock claims a carving in the ancient Bolivian city of Tiwanaku shows an elephant that died out 12,000 years ago, but as Prof. James Bailey points out it is more likely a more recent carving of a parrot. Hancock claims an elephant is more likely due to the supposed date of Tiwanaku being 17,000 years ago, based on the 1940s surveys of Prof. Arthur Posnansky although this antiquity is unproven.

This book is full of `maybes' and `could have beens' but lacking in `proofs'. It makes a good story, but conventional history it isn't.


Your Journey Begins Here, 22 Jun 2006
What can I say, this book is fantastic!

The first few chapters were hard going but once Hancock has given you the facts you need he leads you all over the world on one hell of a journey.

If you read this book before any other on this subject matter you will be perfectly set up to have your eyes forced open at the possibility that what has gone before isn't quite what you thought.

The past is history...

thank you graham hancock, 16 Dec 2007
you do the general public a great service by questioning the mainstream of historians views on civilisations and well history on a whole, i found this book fantastic enlightening scary questionable but most importantly solid his works are well studied and seen first hand. and it will make you re think the history of human civilisation. i for one admire people like graham hancock who arnt afraid to push the bounderies of the incredible acheivments our ancient ancestors discoverd and built where as the mainstream comunity describe them as un civilised barbarians. i recomend this book to every human beign on the planet.

Great entertainment, 29 Jul 2007
Whether you subscribe to Hancock's theories or not, there is no denying that this is an excellent read, thoroughly well-researched and written in an engaging and involving way.

Personally, I felt that the book should have sought to ask some of its questions without then feeling the need to speculate wildly to answer them. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating read and this new edition is worth the money even if you have the original.

General Comment, 05 Dec 2006
The Antikythera Mechanism to reveiwed on C4 12th DECEMBER
has only now been deciphered in its working. This is a mechanism which is over 2000 years old, Hancock will be over the moon about something that according to some little grey cells could never exist.....

Good Hokum, 24 Jul 2006
Firstly the author is a journalist by trade and not an academic historian. Many of the suppositions are based on dubious or discredited sources and are made to fit the author's theories.

The book starts with ancient maps apparently accurately showing Antarctica which wasn't supposed to have been discovered till 1818. This includes the famous Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513 whose author claims it was based on reconstructions of ancient maps, omitting the copying errors (although there is no evidence of these supposed copying errors). The Piri Reis map itself is grossly inaccurate and its sources may only date to the 14th or 15th century and not Hancock's mythical date of 10,500BC. The coastline is vaguely accurate but the interior was probably imaginary as was often the case in this era.

Hancock claims a carving in the ancient Bolivian city of Tiwanaku shows an elephant that died out 12,000 years ago, but as Prof. James Bailey points out it is more likely a more recent carving of a parrot. Hancock claims an elephant is more likely due to the supposed date of Tiwanaku being 17,000 years ago, based on the 1940s surveys of Prof. Arthur Posnansky although this antiquity is unproven.

This book is full of `maybes' and `could have beens' but lacking in `proofs'. It makes a good story, but conventional history it isn't.


Your Journey Begins Here, 22 Jun 2006
What can I say, this book is fantastic!

The first few chapters were hard going but once Hancock has given you the facts you need he leads you all over the world on one hell of a journey.

If you read this book before any other on this subject matter you will be perfectly set up to have your eyes forced open at the possibility that what has gone before isn't quite what you thought.

The past is history...

Life below ground, 06 Apr 2008
In May 2006, Andrew Robertshaw and I stood in Avril William's Ocean Villas tea rooms at Auchonvilliers. Andy told me the story of a British Soldier whose remains had been discovered at serre in 2003, and that amongst his possedcions were coins from Jersey, my home. Whilist everyone might not be lucky enough to be informed and inspired by the man himself, this book will run a close second. No Man's Land groupfirst came to genral notice because of the TV programmes Finding the Fallen and Trench Detectives. This book details the groups objectives and takes the reader through the life of a soldier in the trenches on the Western Front of the Great War. the book starts with a good basic explanation of archeological techniques, the relevance of finds and how they can support the historical record of the times. The text may also change the widley held preconcived ideas of the Great War held by many. The book also deals with the moraltity of excavating those who died within (just) living memory and the problems facing those who live in an area that some se a sacred site, for others just where they live. Far from an academic tome the text is sprinkled with dry humour and sharp comments, this plus the illustrations make it a must read for anyone who visits the area. Walk softly, you not on whom you may be treading.

thank you graham hancock, 16 Dec 2007
you do the general public a great service by questioning the mainstream of historians views on civilisations and well history on a whole, i found this book fantastic enlightening scary questionable but most importantly solid his works are well studied and seen first hand. and it will make you re think the history of human civilisation. i for one admire people like graham hancock who arnt afraid to push the bounderies of the incredible acheivments our ancient ancestors discoverd and built where as the mainstream comunity describe them as un civilised barbarians. i recomend this book to every human beign on the planet.

Great entertainment, 29 Jul 2007
Whether you subscribe to Hancock's theories or not, there is no denying that this is an excellent read, thoroughly well-researched and written in an engaging and involving way.

Personally, I felt that the book should have sought to ask some of its questions without then feeling the need to speculate wildly to answer them. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating read and this new edition is worth the money even if you have the original.

General Comment, 05 Dec 2006
The Antikythera Mechanism to reveiwed on C4 12th DECEMBER
has only now been deciphered in its working. This is a mechanism which is over 2000 years old, Hancock will be over the moon about something that according to some little grey cells could never exist.....

Good Hokum, 24 Jul 2006
Firstly the author is a journalist by trade and not an academic historian. Many of the suppositions are based on dubious or discredited sources and are made to fit the author's theories.

The book starts with ancient maps apparently accurately showing Antarctica which wasn't supposed to have been discovered till 1818. This includes the famous Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513 whose author claims it was based on reconstructions of ancient maps, omitting the copying errors (although there is no evidence of these supposed copying errors). The Piri Reis map itself is grossly inaccurate and its sources may only date to the 14th or 15th century and not Hancock's mythical date of 10,500BC. The coastline is vaguely accurate but the interior was probably imaginary as was often the case in this era.

Hancock claims a carving in the ancient Bolivian city of Tiwanaku shows an elephant that died out 12,000 years ago, but as Prof. James Bailey points out it is more likely a more recent carving of a parrot. Hancock claims an elephant is more likely due to the supposed date of Tiwanaku being 17,000 years ago, based on the 1940s surveys of Prof. Arthur Posnansky although this antiquity is unproven.

This book is full of `maybes' and `could have beens' but lacking in `proofs'. It makes a good story, but conventional history it isn't.


Your Journey Begins Here, 22 Jun 2006
What can I say, this book is fantastic!

The first few chapters were hard going but once Hancock has given you the facts you need he leads you all over the world on one hell of a journey.

If you read this book before any other on this subject matter you will be perfectly set up to have your eyes forced open at the possibility that what has gone before isn't quite what you thought.

The past is history...

Life below ground, 06 Apr 2008
In May 2006, Andrew Robertshaw and I stood in Avril William's Ocean Villas tea rooms at Auchonvilliers. Andy told me the story of a British Soldier whose remains had been discovered at serre in 2003, and that amongst his possedcions were coins from Jersey, my home. Whilist everyone might not be lucky enough to be informed and inspired by the man himself, this book will run a close second. No Man's Land groupfirst came to genral notice because of the TV programmes Finding the Fallen and Trench Detectives. This book details the groups objectives and takes the reader through the life of a soldier in the trenches on the Western Front of the Great War. the book starts with a good basic explanation of archeological techniques, the relevance of finds and how they can support the historical record of the times. The text may also change the widley held preconcived ideas of the Great War held by many. The book also deals with the moraltity of excavating those who died within (just) living memory and the problems facing those who live in an area that some se a sacred site, for others just where they live. Far from an academic tome the text is sprinkled with dry humour and sharp comments, this plus the illustrations make it a must read for anyone who visits the area. Walk softly, you not on whom you may be treading.

Lightweight and unsatisfactory, 21 Jun 2007
I agree with the reviewers "Not Great" and "A Waste of Money". This is a set book for the 1st year of the Open University Classics MA, which I am currently taking, and I find it very lightweight and frustrating. There is nothing to get your teeth into - no case studies (unlike the Renfrew and Bahn book) and nothing to get you thinking and working at the subject. Cannot understand why the OU chose this as their set book rather than Renfrew and Bahn. To be fair to Greene I suspect that the OU course designers didn't even read this book as they refer in their course notes to a 'case study' of the Roman fort at Corbridge which simply isn't in the book - as I said there are no case studies. To any budding archaeology students, if you have a choice go for the Renfrew and Bahn book and give this one a miss.

A good all round synopsis, 10 Apr 2007
This book does not go to deeply into the subject in most instances but it does cover a wide range of subjects and works well with the accompanying website. Yes the Renfrew and Bahn book is much more comprehensive but nowhere near as easy to read.

Get it, it has to be one of the core books along with Renfrew and Bahn

Damn good book, by a damn good lecturer, 30 Sep 2003
Contrary, to the belief of most of the reviewers it is a good book and very useful to theose studying Archaeology, it is especially useful if you happen to study at Newcatle Uni where Kevin Greene himself works and lectures, especially if he takes all of your Archaeology Lectures, as he does with us, as the book ties in with the scheme of work. Even so i bought this book long before i decided to go to Newcastle and it helped me to understand the subject better. Personally this has to be on every archaeology students bookshelf, a winner.

Not great, 26 Mar 2003
I felt this book was actually quite poor. If you would like to read a good general introduction to archaeology, or you are a first year archaeology student, the Renfrew & Bahn's 'Archaeology' is far superior, has a global perpective (as a book on archaeology should) and represents better value for money.

Review of ''Archaeology: an Introduction'', 05 Aug 2002
This is a fantastic book, which can be best described as the bible for all lovers of archaeology. As an archaeology student at university I found this book full to the brim with essential information that every budding archaeologist must have.
The book is well planned out and each chapter leads well into the other. When reading the book you can feel your knowledge of the subject build after every page is turned. The book covers every thing from techniques needed in the field to detailed coverage of previous excavations.
One of the highlights of the book is the superb drawings and sketches that break up the book into easy digestible pieces.
In all this is a must book for all that love the subject.

thank you graham hancock, 16 Dec 2007
you do the general public a great service by questioning the mainstream of historians views on civilisations and well history on a whole, i found this book fantastic enlightening scary questionable but most importantly solid his works are well studied and seen first hand. and it will make you re think the history of human civilisation. i for one admire people like graham hancock who arnt afraid to push the bounderies of the incredible acheivments our ancient ancestors discoverd and built where as the mainstream comunity describe them as un civilised barbarians. i recomend this book to every human beign on the planet.

Great entertainment, 29 Jul 2007
Whether you subscribe to Hancock's theories or not, there is no denying that this is an excellent read, thoroughly well-researched and written in an engaging and involving way.

Personally, I felt that the book should have sought to ask some of its questions without then feeling the need to speculate wildly to answer them. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating read and this new edition is worth the money even if you have the original.

General Comment, 05 Dec 2006
The Antikythera Mechanism to reveiwed on C4 12th DECEMBER
has only now been deciphered in its working. This is a mechanism which is over 2000 years old, Hancock will be over the moon about something that according to some little grey cells could never exist.....

Good Hokum, 24 Jul 2006
Firstly the author is a journalist by trade and not an academic historian. Many of the suppositions are based on dubious or discredited sources and are made to fit the author's theories.

The book starts with ancient maps apparently accurately showing Antarctica which wasn't supposed to have been discovered till 1818. This includes the famous Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513 whose author claims it was based on reconstructions of ancient maps, omitting the copying errors (although there is no evidence of these supposed copying errors). The Piri Reis map itself is grossly inaccurate and its sources may only date to the 14th or 15th century and not Hancock's mythical date of 10,500BC. The coastline is vaguely accurate but the interior was probably imaginary as was often the case in this era.

Hancock claims a carving in the ancient Bolivian city of Tiwanaku shows an elephant that died out 12,000 years ago, but as Prof. James Bailey points out it is more likely a more recent carving of a parrot. Hancock claims an elephant is more likely due to the supposed date of Tiwanaku being 17,000 years ago, based on the 1940s surveys of Prof. Arthur Posnansky although this antiquity is unproven.

This book is full of `maybes' and `could have beens' but lacking in `proofs'. It makes a good story, but conventional history it isn't.


Your Journey Begins Here, 22 Jun 2006
What can I say, this book is fantastic!

The first few chapters were hard going but once Hancock has given you the facts you need he leads you all over the world on one hell of a journey.

If you read this book before any other on this subject matter you will be perfectly set up to have your eyes forced open at the possibility that what has gone before isn't quite what you thought.

The past is history...

Life below ground, 06 Apr 2008
In May 2006, Andrew Robertshaw and I stood in Avril William's Ocean Villas tea rooms at Auchonvilliers. Andy told me the story of a British Soldier whose remains had been discovered at serre in 2003, and that amongst his possedcions were coins from Jersey, my home. Whilist everyone might not be lucky enough to be informed and inspired by the man himself, this book will run a close second. No Man's Land groupfirst came to genral notice because of the TV programmes Finding the Fallen and Trench Detectives. This book details the groups objectives and takes the reader through the life of a soldier in the trenches on the Western Front of the Great War. the book starts with a good basic explanation of archeological techniques, the relevance of finds and how they can support the historical record of the times. The text may also change the widley held preconcived ideas of the Great War held by many. The book also deals with the moraltity of excavating those who died within (just) living memory and the problems facing those who live in an area that some se a sacred site, for others just where they live. Far from an academic tome the text is sprinkled with dry humour and sharp comments, this plus the illustrations make it a must read for anyone who visits the area. Walk softly, you not on whom you may be treading.

Lightweight and unsatisfactory, 21 Jun 2007
I agree with the reviewers "Not Great" and "A Waste of Money". This is a set book for the 1st year of the Open University Classics MA, which I am currently taking, and I find it very lightweight and frustrating. There is nothing to get your teeth into - no case studies (unlike the Renfrew and Bahn book) and nothing to get you thinking and working at the subject. Cannot understand why the OU chose this as their set book rather than Renfrew and Bahn. To be fair to Greene I suspect that the OU course designers didn't even read this book as they refer in their course notes to a 'case study' of the Roman fort at Corbridge which simply isn't in the book - as I said there are no case studies. To any budding archaeology students, if you have a choice go for the Renfrew and Bahn book and give this one a miss.

A good all round synopsis, 10 Apr 2007
This book does not go to deeply into the subject in most instances but it does cover a wide range of subjects and works well with the accompanying website. Yes the Renfrew and Bahn book is much more comprehensive but nowhere near as easy to read.

Get it, it has to be one of the core books along with Renfrew and Bahn

Damn good book, by a damn good lecturer, 30 Sep 2003
Contrary, to the belief of most of the reviewers it is a good book and very useful to theose studying Archaeology, it is especially useful if you happen to study at Newcatle Uni where Kevin Greene himself works and lectures, especially if he takes all of your Archaeology Lectures, as he does with us, as the book ties in with the scheme of work. Even so i bought this book long before i decided to go to Newcastle and it helped me to understand the subject better. Personally this has to be on every archaeology students bookshelf, a winner.

Not great, 26 Mar 2003
I felt this book was actually quite poor. If you would like to read a good general introduction to archaeology, or you are a first year archaeology student, the Renfrew & Bahn's 'Archaeology' is far superior, has a global perpective (as a book on archaeology should) and represents better value for money.

Review of ''Archaeology: an Introduction'', 05 Aug 2002
This is a fantastic book, which can be best described as the bible for all lovers of archaeology. As an archaeology student at university I found this book full to the brim with essential information that every budding archaeologist must have.
The book is well planned out and each chapter leads well into the other. When reading the book you can feel your knowledge of the subject build after every page is turned. The book covers every thing from techniques needed in the field to detailed coverage of previous excavations.
One of the highlights of the book is the superb drawings and sketches that break up the book into easy digestible pieces.
In all this is a must book for all that love the subject.

Excellent for students, 15 Sep 2005
Every student does it - you get your reading list and you go and buy everything on it, then you never even glance at most of the books again as they sit forlornly on the shelf, gathering dust.

Well, if this book is on your reading list then please, don't leave it on the bookshelf; pick it up and read it. Unlike most textbooks on the subject, this book is not overwhelmingly long. You can easily read a chapter on your chosen subject in depth in about half an hour - perfect for those last-minute essays!

Because of its size it is obviously not a comprehensive look at Archaeology - for that I suggest Renfrew and Bahn's Archaeology: Theory and Practice - but it is definitely one of the best starter books for students new to Archaeology.

Archaeological theory - Matthew Johnson, 17 Aug 2005
As an archaeology undergraduate, this is without doubt one of the best introductions to archaeological theory I have come across. Matthew Johnson uses a style that is both witty, incisive and informative. Complex issues are carefully explained and examples are critically chosen.

In addition to an entertaining and informative text, there is an extensive 'further reading' section which refers the reader to more detailed works, a large bibliography, detailed index and selective glossary.

I was a newcomer to the subject, but Johnson's style soon made me feel at home, and provided me with a springboard into further and more detailed reading. I would heartily recommend this book to students of archaeology at all levels.

Everything you need to know...., 10 Mar 2005
And more. This is an excellent text book - easily the best I've purchased in my 3 years of university study.

Johnson covers the history of archaeological thought, the different theoretical schools in archaeology and anthropological/social sciences and everything else that you need to know about archaeological theory. All written in a very engaging and entertaining style; Johnson even manages to keep the normally dry topics interesting.

If you're an archaeology student, BUY THIS BOOK! You won't need any other on this topic.

A most worthy guide to the basics of archaeological theory, 23 Feb 2000
Johnson's book stands alone within the field of archaeological theory. It has the honorable title of being the most accessible book on archaeological theory, without doubt.

Contained within its pages is a text aimed at students, and those who need an easy to read guide to archaeological theory. It is written in a way as to explain why theory is relevant, something I questioned before reading this book.

Not only does he address all the relevant questions and themes in archaeological theory, but he does it in a manner that can be understood by someone with no grounding in theory whatsoever. Having some prior knowledge is useful, but unlike books such as Trigger's "A History of Archaeological Thought" (1989) it is not essential.

Obviously for a book of 200 pages, it does not go into huge detail about the topics it covers (pretty much all of them!) but it acts as a superb introduction, which is its purpose. Having read the relevant chapter in Johnson, one can move onto more detailed texts, which are far less accessible.

The only criticism I have for the book is its index, which could cover more terms that are mentioned in the book. However, with a good contents page, it is easy to find the chapter relating to the desired topic, and unlike most texts it is not a chore to read up to the point you need.

Therefore, this book is essential reading for anyone doing work on theory in archaeology, and should sit on the bookshelf of anyone who would ever need to know anything about the subject - something about just about every topic will be in there somewhere!

thank you graham hancock, 16 Dec 2007
you do the general public a great service by questioning the mainstream of historians views on civilisations and well history on a whole, i found this book fantastic enlightening scary questionable but most importantly solid his works are well studied and seen first hand. and it will make you re think the history of human civilisation. i for one admire people like graham hancock who arnt afraid to push the bounderies of the incredible acheivments our ancient ancestors discoverd and built where as the mainstream comunity describe them as un civilised barbarians. i recomend this book to every human beign on the planet.

Great entertainment, 29 Jul 2007
Whether you subscribe to Hancock's theories or not, there is no denying that this is an excellent read, thoroughly well-researched and written in an engaging and involving way.

Personally, I felt that the book should have sought to ask some of its questions without then feeling the need to speculate wildly to answer them. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating read and this new edition is worth the money even if you have the original.

General Comment, 05 Dec 2006
The Antikythera Mechanism to reveiwed on C4 12th DECEMBER
has only now been deciphered in its working. This is a mechanism which is over 2000 years old, Hancock will be over the moon about something that according to some little grey cells could never exist.....

Good Hokum, 24 Jul 2006
Firstly the author is a journalist by trade and not an academic historian. Many of the suppositions are based on dubious or discredited sources and are made to fit the author's theories.

The book starts with ancient maps apparently accurately showing Antarctica which wasn't supposed to have been discovered till 1818. This includes the famous Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513 whose author claims it was based on reconstructions of ancient maps, omitting the copying errors (although there is no evidence of these supposed copying errors). The Piri Reis map itself is grossly inaccurate and its sources may only date to the 14th or 15th century and not Hancock's mythical date of 10,500BC. The coastline is vaguely accurate but the interior was probably imaginary as was often the case in this era.

Hancock claims a carving in the ancient Bolivian city of Tiwanaku shows an elephant that died out 12,000 years ago, but as Prof. James Bailey points out it is more likely a more recent carving of a parrot. Hancock claims an elephant is more likely due to the supposed date of Tiwanaku being 17,000 years ago, based on the 1940s surveys of Prof. Arthur Posnansky although this antiquity is unproven.

This book is full of `maybes' and `could have beens' but lacking in `proofs'. It makes a good story, but conventional history it isn't.


Your Journey Begins Here, 22 Jun 2006
What can I say, this book is fantastic!

The first few chapters were hard going but once Hancock has given you the facts you need he leads you all over the world on one hell of a journey.

If you read this book before any other on this subject matter you will be perfectly set up to have your eyes forced open at the possibility that what has gone before isn't quite what you thought.

The past is history...

Life below ground, 06 Apr 2008
In May 2006, Andrew Robertshaw and I stood in Avril William's Ocean Villas tea rooms at Auchonvilliers. Andy told me the story of a British Soldier whose remains had been discovered at serre in 2003, and that amongst his possedcions were coins from Jersey, my home. Whilist everyone might not be lucky enough to be informed and inspired by the man himself, this book will run a close second. No Man's Land groupfirst came to genral notice because of the TV programmes Finding the Fallen and Trench Detectives. This book details the groups objectives and takes the reader through the life of a soldier in the trenches on the Western Front of the Great War. the book starts with a good basic explanation of archeological techniques, the relevance of finds and how they can support the historical record of the times. The text may also change the widley held preconcived ideas of the Great War held by many. The book also deals with the moraltity of excavating those who died within (just) living memory and the problems facing those who live in an area that some se a sacred site, for others just where they live. Far from an academic tome the text is sprinkled with dry humour and sharp comments, this plus the illustrations make it a must read for anyone who visits the area. Walk softly, you not on whom you may be treading.

Lightweight and unsatisfactory, 21 Jun 2007
I agree with the reviewers "Not Great" and "A Waste of Money". This is a set book for the 1st year of the Open University Classics MA, which I am currently taking, and I find it very lightweight and frustrating. There is nothing to get your teeth into - no case studies (unlike the Renfrew and Bahn book) and nothing to get you thinking and working at the subject. Cannot understand why the OU chose this as their set book rather than Renfrew and Bahn. To be fair to Greene I suspect that the OU course designers didn't even read this book as they refer in their course notes to a 'case study' of the Roman fort at Corbridge which simply isn't in the book - as I said there are no case studies. To any budding archaeology students, if you have a choice go for the Renfrew and Bahn book and give this one a miss.

A good all round synopsis, 10 Apr 2007
This book does not go to deeply into the subject in most instances but it does cover a wide range of subjects and works well with the accompanying website. Yes the Renfrew and Bahn book is much more comprehensive but nowhere near as easy to read.

Get it, it has to be one of the core books along with Renfrew and Bahn

Damn good book, by a damn good lecturer, 30 Sep 2003
Contrary, to the belief of most of the reviewers it is a good book and very useful to theose studying Archaeology, it is especially useful if you happen to study at Newcatle Uni where Kevin Greene himself works and lectures, especially if he takes all of your Archaeology Lectures, as he does with us, as the book ties in with the scheme of work. Even so i bought this book long before i decided to go to Newcastle and it helped me to understand the subject better. Personally this has to be on every archaeology students bookshelf, a winner.

Not great, 26 Mar 2003
I felt this book was actually quite poor. If you would like to read a good general introduction to archaeology, or you are a first year archaeology student, the Renfrew & Bahn's 'Archaeology' is far superior, has a global perpective (as a book on archaeology should) and represents better value for money.

Review of ''Archaeology: an Introduction'', 05 Aug 2002
This is a fantastic book, which can be best described as the bible for all lovers of archaeology. As an archaeology student at university I found this book full to the brim with essential information that every budding archaeologist must have.
The book is well planned out and each chapter leads well into the other. When reading the book you can feel your knowledge of the subject build after every page is turned. The book covers every thing from techniques needed in the field to detailed coverage of previous excavations.
One of the highlights of the book is the superb drawings and sketches that break up the book into easy digestible pieces.
In all this is a must book for all that love the subject.

Excellent for students, 15 Sep 2005
Every student does it - you get your reading list and you go and buy everything on it, then you never even glance at most of the books again as they sit forlornly on the shelf, gathering dust.

Well, if this book is on your reading list then please, don't leave it on the bookshelf; pick it up and read it. Unlike most textbooks on the subject, this book is not overwhelmingly long. You can easily read a chapter on your chosen subject in depth in about half an hour - perfect for those last-minute essays!

Because of its size it is obviously not a comprehensive look at Archaeology - for that I suggest Renfrew and Bahn's Archaeology: Theory and Practice - but it is definitely one of the best starter books for students new to Archaeology.

Archaeological theory - Matthew Johnson, 17 Aug 2005
As an archaeology undergraduate, this is without doubt one of the best introductions to archaeological theory I have come across. Matthew Johnson uses a style that is both witty, incisive and informative. Complex issues are carefully explained and examples are critically chosen.

In addition to an entertaining and informative text, there is an extensive 'further reading' section which refers the reader to more detailed works, a large bibliography, detailed index and selective glossary.

I was a newcomer to the subject, but Johnson's style soon made me feel at home, and provided me with a springboard into further and more detailed reading. I would heartily recommend this book to students of archaeology at all levels.

Everything you need to know...., 10 Mar 2005
And more. This is an excellent text book - easily the best I've purchased in my 3 years of university study.

Johnson covers the history of archaeological thought, the different theoretical schools in archaeology and anthropological/social sciences and everything else that you need to know about archaeological theory. All written in a very engaging and entertaining style; Johnson even manages to keep the normally dry topics interesting.

If you're an archaeology student, BUY THIS BOOK! You won't need any other on this topic.

A most worthy guide to the basics of archaeological theory, 23 Feb 2000
Johnson's book stands alone within the field of archaeological theory. It has the honorable title of being the most accessible book on archaeological theory, without doubt.

Contained within its pages is a text aimed at students, and those who need an easy to read guide to archaeological theory. It is written in a way as to explain why theory is relevant, something I questioned before reading this book.

Not only does he address all the relevant questions and themes in archaeological theory, but he does it in a manner that can be understood by someone with no grounding in theory whatsoever. Having some prior knowledge is useful, but unlike books such as Trigger's "A History of Archaeological Thought" (1989) it is not essential.

Obviously for a book of 200 pages, it does not go into huge detail about the topics it covers (pretty much all of them!) but it acts as a superb introduction, which is its purpose. Having read the relevant chapter in Johnson, one can move onto more detailed texts, which are far less accessible.

The only criticism I have for the book is its index, which could cover more terms that are mentioned in the book. However, with a good contents page, it is easy to find the chapter relating to the desired topic, and unlike most texts it is not a chore to read up to the point you need.

Therefore, this book is essential reading for anyone doing work on theory in archaeology, and should sit on the bookshelf of anyone who would ever need to know anything about the subject - something about just about every topic will be in there somewhere!

Ideal book for anyone interested in archaeology., 18 Nov 2001
This book is a very good introduction to air photographs for both students and anyone interested in archaeology. It has a very good section on the history of air photos, and how to interpret them. The best section is the one on false and modern sites, and how not to interpret a WWII site as a medieval one!

thank you graham hancock, 16 Dec 2007
you do the general public a great service by questioning the mainstream of historians views on civilisations and well history on a whole, i found this book fantastic enlightening scary questionable but most importantly solid his works are well studied and seen first hand. and it will make you re think the history of human civilisation. i for one admire people like graham hancock who arnt afraid to push the bounderies of the incredible acheivments our ancient ancestors discoverd and built where as the mainstream comunity describe them as un civilised barbarians. i recomend this book to every human beign on the planet.

Great entertainment, 29 Jul 2007
Whether you subscribe to Hancock's theories or not, there is no denying that this is an excellent read, thoroughly well-researched and written in an engaging and involving way.

Personally, I felt that the book should have sought to ask some of its questions without then feeling the need to speculate wildly to answer them. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating read and this new edition is worth the money even if you have the original.

General Comment, 05 Dec 2006
The Antikythera Mechanism to reveiwed on C4 12th DECEMBER
has only now been deciphered in its working. This is a mechanism which is over 2000 years old, Hancock will be over the moon about something that according to some little grey cells could never exist.....

Good Hokum, 24 Jul 2006
Firstly the author is a journalist by trade and not an academic historian. Many of the suppositions are based on dubious or discredited sources and are made to fit the author's theories.

The book starts with ancient maps apparently accurately showing Antarctica which wasn't supposed to have been discovered till 1818. This includes the famous Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513 whose author claims it was based on reconstructions of ancient maps, omitting the copying errors (although there is no evidence of these supposed copying errors). The Piri Reis map itself is grossly inaccurate and its sources may only date to the 14th or 15th century and not Hancock's mythical date of 10,500BC. The coastline is vaguely accurate but the interior was probably imaginary as was often the case in this era.

Hancock claims a carving in the ancient Bolivian city of Tiwanaku shows an elephant that died out 12,000 years ago, but as Prof. James Bailey points out it is more likely a more recent carving of a parrot. Hancock claims an elephant is more likely due to the supposed date of Tiwanaku being 17,000 years ago, based on the 1940s surveys of Prof. Arthur Posnansky although this antiquity is unproven.

This book is full of `maybes' and `could have beens' but lacking in `proofs'. It makes a good story, but conventional history it isn't.


Your Journey Begins Here, 22 Jun 2006
What can I say, this book is fantastic!

The first few chapters were hard going but once Hancock has given you the facts you need he leads you all over the world on one hell of a journey.

If you read this book before any other on this subject matter you will be perfectly set up to have your eyes forced open at the possibility that what has gone before isn't quite what you thought.

The past is history...

Life below ground, 06 Apr 2008
In May 2006, Andrew Robertshaw and I stood in Avril William's Ocean Villas tea rooms at Auchonvilliers. Andy told me the story of a British Soldier whose remains had been discovered at serre in 2003, and that amongst his possedcions were coins from Jersey, my home. Whilist everyone might not be lucky enough to be informed and inspired by the man himself, this book will run a close second. No Man's Land groupfirst came to genral notice because of the TV programmes Finding the Fallen and Trench Detectives. This book details the groups objectives and takes the reader through the life of a soldier in the trenches on the Western Front of the Great War. the book starts with a good basic explanation of archeological techniques, the relevance of finds and how they can support the historical record of the times. The text may also change the widley held preconcived ideas of the Great War held by many. The book also deals with the moraltity of excavating those who died within (just) living memory and the problems facing those who live in an area that some se a sacred site, for others just where they live. Far from an academic tome the text is sprinkled with dry humour and sharp comments, this plus the illustrations make it a must read for anyone who visits the area. Walk softly, you not on whom you may be treading.

Lightweight and unsatisfactory, 21 Jun 2007
I agree with the reviewers "Not Great" and "A Waste of Money". This is a set book for the 1st year of the Open University Classics MA, which I am currently taking, and I find it very lightweight and frustrating. There is nothing to get your teeth into - no case studies (unlike the Renfrew and Bahn book) and nothing to get you thinking and working at the subject. Cannot understand why the OU chose this as their set book rather than Renfrew and Bahn. To be fair to Greene I suspect that the OU course designers didn't even read this book as they refer in their course notes to a 'case study' of the Roman fort at Corbridge which simply isn't in the book - as I said there are no case studies. To any budding archaeology students, if you have a choice go for the Renfrew and Bahn book and give this one a miss.

A good all round synopsis, 10 Apr 2007
This book does not go to deeply into the subject in most instances but it does cover a wide range of subjects and works well with the accompanying website. Yes the Renfrew and Bahn book is much more comprehensive but nowhere near as easy to read.

Get it, it has to be one of the core books along with Renfrew and Bahn

Damn good book, by a damn good lecturer, 30 Sep 2003
Contrary, to the belief of most of the reviewers it is a good book and very useful to theose studying Archaeology, it is especially useful if you happen to study at Newcatle Uni where Kevin Greene himself works and lectures, especially if he takes all of your Archaeology Lectures, as he does with us, as the book ties in with the scheme of work. Even so i bought this book long before i decided to go to Newcastle and it helped me to understand the subject better. Personally this has to be on every archaeology students bookshelf, a winner.

Not great, 26 Mar 2003
I felt this book was actually quite poor. If you would like to read a good general introduction to archaeology, or you are a first year archaeology student, the Renfrew & Bahn's 'Archaeology' is far superior, has a global perpective (as a book on archaeology should) and represents better value for money.

Review of ''Archaeology: an Introduction'', 05 Aug 2002
This is a fantastic book, which can be best described as the bible for all lovers of archaeology. As an archaeology student at university I found this book full to the brim with essential information that every budding archaeologist must have.
The book is well planned out and each chapter leads well into the other. When reading the book you can feel your knowledge of the subject build after every page is turned. The book covers every thing from techniques needed in the field to detailed coverage of previous excavations.
One of the highlights of the book is the superb drawings and sketches that break up the book into easy digestible pieces.
In all this is a must book for all that love the subject.

Excellent for students, 15 Sep 2005
Every student does it - you get your reading list and you go and buy everything on it, then you never even glance at most of the books again as they sit forlornly on the shelf, gathering dust.

Well, if this book is on your reading list then please, don't leave it on the bookshelf; pick it up and read it. Unlike most textbooks on the subject, this book is not overwhelmingly long. You can easily read a chapter on your chosen subject in depth in about half an hour - perfect for those last-minute essays!

Because of its size it is obviously not a comprehensive look at Archaeology - for that I suggest Renfrew and Bahn's Archaeology: Theory and Practice - but it is definitely one of the best starter books for students new to Archaeology.

Archaeological theory - Matthew Johnson, 17 Aug 2005
As an archaeology undergraduate, this is without doubt one of the best introductions to archaeological theory I have come across. Matthew Johnson uses a style that is both witty, incisive and informative. Complex issues are carefully explained and examples are critically chosen.

In addition to an entertaining and informative text, there is an extensive 'further reading' section which refers the reader to more detailed works, a large bibliography, detailed index and selective glossary.

I was a newcomer to the subject, but Johnson's style soon made me feel at home, and provided me with a springboard into further and more detailed reading. I would heartily recommend this book to students of archaeology at all levels.

Everything you need to know...., 10 Mar 2005
And more. This is an excellent text book - easily the best I've purchased in my 3 years of university study.

Johnson covers the history of archaeological thought, the different theoretical schools in archaeology and anthropological/social sciences and everything else that you need to know about archaeological theory. All written in a very engaging and entertaining style; Johnson even manages to keep the normally dry topics interesting.

If you're an archaeology student, BUY THIS BOOK! You won't need any other on this topic.

A most worthy guide to the basics of archaeological theory, 23 Feb 2000
Johnson's book stands alone within the field of archaeological theory. It has the honorable title of being the most accessible book on archaeological theory, without doubt.

Contained within its pages is a text aimed at students, and those who need an easy to read guide to archaeological theory. It is written in a way as to explain why theory is relevant, something I questioned before reading this book.

Not only does he address all the relevant questions and themes in archaeological theory, but he does it in a manner that can be understood by someone with no grounding in theory whatsoever. Having some prior knowledge is useful, but unlike books such as Trigger's "A History of Archaeological Thought" (1989) it is not essential.

Obviously for a book of 200 pages, it does not go into huge detail about the topics it covers (pretty much all of them!) but it acts as a superb introduction, which is its purpose. Having read the relevant chapter in Johnson, one can move onto more detailed texts, which are far less accessible.

The only criticism I have for the book is its index, which could cover more terms that are mentioned in the book. However, with a good contents page, it is easy to find the chapter relating to the desired topic, and unlike most texts it is not a chore to read up to the point you need.

Therefore, this book is essential reading for anyone doing work on theory in archaeology, and should sit on the bookshelf of anyone who would ever need to know anything about the subject - something about just about every topic will be in there somewhere!

Ideal book for anyone interested in archaeology., 18 Nov 2001
This book is a very good introduction to air photographs for both students and anyone interested in archaeology. It has a very good section on the history of air photos, and how to interpret them. The best section is the one on false and modern sites, and how not to interpret a WWII site as a medieval one!

Superb book, one of those must have titles., 08 Dec 2007
In every hobby or subjsect there is usually one book that becomes the Bible of that subject, I think this book is it for flintknapping. Ive read many others, nothing comes close to this!

A comprehensive guide & a good read, 30 Oct 2004
Whilst the book does go into more detail than most people would be looking for (I guess), the book is well written, very interesting and covers the basics as well as the advanced stuff so that anyone can get started in flintknapping. Lots of archaeological information and cross-references for those taking it more seriously. Buy it!

Simply superb, 04 Sep 2003
I knew nothing about flintknapping until I bought this book. I may get round to trying some knapping soon but right now I'm enjoying the book so much I cant put it down! Its technical but written to make the whole subject instantly crystal clear and with the ability to draw the reader in. Very enjoyable and informative.

Flintknapping - John Whittaker, 15 May 2003
Generally an excellent work. Will be of great use to the archaeological student, expert or novice flintknapper.
The author clearly defines boundaries between researched material and opinion. In several cases giving an opinion but ensuring that where others disagree with this there are the relevant argumants and references.
Superb bibliography and references section.
Where it is lacking, if anywhere, is in basic instruction diagrammes; these could be a little more step-by-step in order that novices (like me) could fiollow them more easily.

An excellent choice for both novice and expert., 26 Mar 2000
If I could only have one book on flintknapping, this would be it; if I could have several, this would be one of them. Quite simply, this is the best of all the titles on the subject that I have read. As a complete novice, starting to knap as a hobby using Sussex flint, I have had no one to turn to for advice and so have had to learn from the texts. I have read all the titles currently available and found this to the best.

Taking the beginner from the very basics, through all techniques, and then concluding by putting it all into context with examples, it serves as an excellent all rounder. Whilst I have improved the standard of my knapping, I still keep it by me for reference and assistance.

Knapping has become my primary hobby and in no small part my ability comes from the pages of John Whitakers' book. An excellent read and an excellent technical source.

thank you graham hancock, 16 Dec 2007
you do the general public a great service by questioning the mainstream of historians views on civilisations and well history on a whole, i found this book fantastic enlightening scary questionable but most importantly solid his works are well studied and seen first hand. and it will make you re think the history of human civilisation. i for one admire people like graham hancock who arnt afraid to push the bounderies of the incredible acheivments our ancient ancestors discoverd and built where as the mainstream comunity describe them as un civilised barbarians. i recomend this book to every human beign on the planet.

Great entertainment, 29 Jul 2007
Whether you subscribe to Hancock's theories or not, there is no denying that this is an excellent read, thoroughly well-researched and written in an engaging and involving way.

Personally, I felt that the book should have sought to ask some of its questions without then feeling the need to speculate wildly to answer them. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating read and this new edition is worth the money even if you have the original.

General Comment, 05 Dec 2006
The Antikythera Mechanism to reveiwed on C4 12th DECEMBER
has only now been deciphered in its working. This is a mechanism which is over 2000 years old, Hancock will be over the moon about something that according to some little grey cells could never exist.....

Good Hokum, 24 Jul 2006
Firstly the author is a journalist by trade and not an academic historian. Many of the suppositions are based on dubious or discredited sources and are made to fit the author's theories.

The book starts with ancient maps apparently accurately showing Antarctica which wasn't supposed to have been discovered till 1818. This includes the famous Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513 whose author claims it was based on reconstructions of ancient maps, omitting the copying errors (although there is no evidence of these supposed copying errors). The Piri Reis map itself is grossly inaccurate and its sources may only date to the 14th or 15th century and not Hancock's mythical date of 10,500BC. The coastline is vaguely accurate but the interior was probably imaginary as was often the case in this era.

Hancock claims a carving in the ancient Bolivian city of Tiwanaku shows an elephant that died out 12,000 years ago, but as Prof. James Bailey points out it is more likely a more recent carving of a parrot. Hancock claims an elephant is more likely due to the supposed date of Tiwanaku being 17,000 years ago, based on the 1940s surveys of Prof. Arthur Posnansky although this antiquity is unproven.

This book is full of `maybes' and `could have beens' but lacking in `proofs'. It makes a good story, but conventional history it isn't.


Your Journey Begins Here, 22 Jun 2006
What can I say, this book is fantastic!

The first few chapters were hard going but once Hancock has given you the facts you need he leads you all over the world on one hell of a journey.

If you read this book before any other on this subject matter you will be perfectly set up to have your eyes forced open at the possibility that what has gone before isn't quite what you thought.

The past is history...

Life below ground, 06 Apr 2008
In May 2006, Andrew Robertshaw and I stood in Avril William's Ocean Villas tea rooms at Auchonvilliers. Andy told me the story of a British Soldier whose remains had been discovered at serre in 2003, and that amongst his possedcions were coins from Jersey, my home. Whilist everyone might not be lucky enough to be informed and inspired by the man himself, this book will run a close second. No Man's Land groupfirst came to genral notice because of the TV programmes Finding the Fallen and Trench Detectives. This book details the groups objectives and takes the reader through the life of a soldier in the trenches on the Western Front of the Great War. the book starts with a good basic explanation of archeological techniques, the relevance of finds and how they can support the historical record of the times. The text may also change the widley held preconcived ideas of the Great War held by many. The book also deals with the moraltity of excavating those who died within (just) living memory and the problems facing those who live in an area that some se a sacred site, for others just where they live. Far from an academic tome the text is sprinkled with dry humour and sharp comments, this plus the illustrations make it a must read for anyone who visits the area. Walk softly, you not on whom you may be treading.

Lightweight and unsatisfactory, 21 Jun 2007
I agree with the reviewers "Not Great" and "A Waste of Money". This is a set book for the 1st year of the Open University Classics MA, which I am currently taking, and I find it very lightweight and frustrating. There is nothing to get your teeth into - no case studies (unlike the Renfrew and Bahn book) and nothing to get you thinking and working at the subject. Cannot understand why the OU chose this as their set book rather than Renfrew and Bahn. To be fair to Greene I suspect that the OU course designers didn't even read this book as they refer in their course notes to a 'case study' of the Roman fort at Corbridge which simply isn't in the book - as I said there are no case studies. To any budding archaeology students, if you have a choice go for the Renfrew and Bahn book and give this one a miss.

A good all round synopsis, 10 Apr 2007
This book does not go to deeply into the subject in most instances but it does cover a wide range of subjects and works well with the accompanying website. Yes the Renfrew and Bahn book is much more comprehensive but nowhere near as easy to read.

Get it, it has to be one of the core books along with Renfrew and Bahn

Damn good book, by a damn good lecturer, 30 Sep 2003
Contrary, to the belief of most of the reviewers it is a good book and very useful to theose studying Archaeology, it is especially useful if you happen to study at Newcatle Uni where Kevin Greene himself works and lectures, especially if he takes all of your Archaeology Lectures, as he does with us, as the book ties in with the scheme of work. Even so i bought this book long before i decided to go to Newcastle and it helped me to understand the subject better. Personally this has to be on every archaeology students bookshelf, a winner.

Not great, 26 Mar 2003
I felt this book was actually quite poor. If you would like to read a good general introduction to archaeology, or you are a first year archaeology student, the Renfrew & Bahn's 'Archaeology' is far superior, has a global perpective (as a book on archaeology should) and represents better value for money.

Review of ''Archaeology: an Introduction'', 05 Aug 2002
This is a fantastic book, which can be best described as the bible for all lovers of archaeology. As an archaeology student at university I found this book full to the brim with essential information that every budding archaeologist must have.
The book is well planned out and each chapter leads well into the other. When reading the book you can feel your knowledge of the subject build after every page is turned. The book covers every thing from techniques needed in the field to detailed coverage of previous excavations.
One of the highlights of the book is the superb drawings and sketches that break up the book into easy digestible pieces.
In all this is a must book for all that love the subject.

Excellent for students, 15 Sep 2005
Every student does it - you get your reading list and you go and buy everything on it, then you never even glance at most of the books again as they sit forlornly on the shelf, gathering dust.

Well, if this book is on your reading list then please, don't leave it on the bookshelf; pick it up and read it. Unlike most textbooks on the subject, this book is not overwhelmingly long. You can easily read a chapter on your chosen subject in depth in about half an hour - perfect for those last-minute essays!

Because of its size it is obviously not a comprehensive look at Archaeology - for that I suggest Renfrew and Bahn's Archaeology: Theory and Practice - but it is definitely one of the best starter books for students new to Archaeology.

Archaeological theory - Matthew Johnson, 17 Aug 2005
As an archaeology undergraduate, this is without doubt one of the best introductions to archaeological theory I have come across. Matthew Johnson uses a style that is both witty, incisive and informative. Complex issues are carefully explained and examples are critically chosen.

In addition to an entertaining and informative text, there is an extensive 'further reading' section which refers the reader to more detailed works, a large bibliography, detailed index and selective glossary.

I was a newcomer to the subject, but Johnson's style soon made me feel at home, and provided me with a springboard into further and more detailed reading. I would heartily recommend this book to students of archaeology at all levels.

Everything you need to know...., 10 Mar 2005
And more. This is an excellent text book - easily the best I've purchased in my 3 years of university study.

Johnson covers the history of archaeological thought, the different theoretical schools in archaeology and anthropological/social sciences and everything else that you need to know about archaeological theory. All written in a very engaging and entertaining style; Johnson even manages to keep the normally dry topics interesting.

If you're an archaeology student, BUY THIS BOOK! You won't need any other on this topic.

A most worthy guide to the basics of archaeological theory, 23 Feb 2000
Johnson's book stands alone within the field of archaeological theory. It has the honorable title of being the most accessible book on archaeological theory, without doubt.

Contained within its pages is a text aimed at students, and those who need an easy to read guide to archaeological theory. It is written in a way as to explain why theory is relevant, something I questioned before reading this book.

Not only does he address all the relevant questions and themes in archaeological theory, but he does it in a manner that can be understood by someone with no grounding in theory whatsoever. Having some prior knowledge is useful, but unlike books such as Trigger's "A History of Archaeological Thought" (1989) it is not essential.

Obviously for a book of 200 pages, it does not go into huge detail about the topics it covers (pretty much all of them!) but it acts as a superb introduction, which is its purpose. Having read the relevant chapter in Johnson, one can move onto more detailed texts, which are far less accessible.

The only criticism I have for the book is its index, which could cover more terms that are mentioned in the book. However, with a good contents page, it is easy to find the chapter relating to the desired topic, and unlike most texts it is not a chore to read up to the point you need.

Therefore, this book is essential reading for anyone doing work on theory in archaeology, and should sit on the bookshelf of anyone who would ever need to know anything about the subject - something about just about every topic will be in there somewhere!

Ideal book for anyone interested in archaeology., 18 Nov 2001
This book is a very good introduction to air photographs for both students and anyone interested in archaeology. It has a very good section on the history of air photos, and how to interpret them. The best section is the one on false and modern sites, and how not to interpret a WWII site as a medieval one!

Superb book, one of those must have titles., 08 Dec 2007
In every hobby or subjsect there is usually one book that becomes the Bible of that subject, I think this book is it for flintknapping. Ive read many others, nothing comes close to this!

A comprehensive guide & a good read, 30 Oct 2004
Whilst the book does go into more detail than most people would be looking for (I guess), the book is well written, very interesting and covers the basics as well as the advanced stuff so that anyone can get started in flintknapping. Lots of archaeological information and cross-references for those taking it more seriously. Buy it!

Simply superb, 04 Sep 2003
I knew nothing about flintknapping until I bought this book. I may get round to trying some knapping soon but right now I'm enjoying the book so much I cant put it down! Its technical but written to make the whole subject instantly crystal clear and with the ability to draw the reader in. Very enjoyable and informative.

Flintknapping - John Whittaker, 15 May 2003
Generally an excellent work. Will be of great use to the archaeological student, expert or novice flintknapper.
The author clearly defines boundaries between researched material and opinion. In several cases giving an opinion but ensuring that where others disagree with this there are the relevant argumants and references.
Superb bibliography and references section.
Where it is lacking, if anywhere, is in basic instruction diagrammes; these could be a little more step-by-step in order that novices (like me) could fiollow them more easily.

An excellent choice for both novice and expert., 26 Mar 2000
If I could only have one book on flintknapping, this would be it; if I could have several, this would be one of them. Quite simply, this is the best of all the titles on the subject that I have read. As a complete novice, starting to knap as a hobby using Sussex flint, I have had no one to turn to for advice and so have had to learn from the texts. I have read all the titles currently available and found this to the best.

Taking the beginner from the very basics, through all techniques, and then concluding by putting it all into context with examples, it serves as an excellent all rounder. Whilst I have improved the standard of my knapping, I still keep it by me for reference and assistance.

Knapping has become my primary hobby and in no small part my ability comes from the pages of John Whitakers' book. An excellent read and an excellent technical source.

A great guide to non-intrusive hightech archaeology., 18 Aug 2001
Clark manages to write about the methods used extensively both in academic and industrial archaeology in a way that holds the interest of any archaeologist even if he or she doesn't understand the science behind the technique. If the science is of interest it is explained but written in a manner it can easily be skipped by those disinterested. He charts the history of archaeological survey from General Pitt-Rivers's hitting the ground with hammers and listening for odd echos right through till today. He also adds the indispensible (for student at least) aid of many examples of where these techniques have and have not worked and importantly why. Whether an amateur archaeologist or a student this book is not only helpfull but also interesting as many science books are not.

Two Men in a Trench is the richly illustrated companion to the sprightly BBC television history programme of the same name. Despite announcing in their introduction that battlefield archaeology is "too exciting for words" Tony Pollard and Neil Oliver--the soi-disant Jamie Olivers of archaeology--provide an articulate and engaging account of their tour of six major British battlefield sites.

Closely following the formula (and transcripts) of the series, each chapter begins with an impressively succinct historical outline of the battle in question. The duo then present a detailed investigation of the site, revealing along the way just what a tricky but exciting old business archaeology can be. For example, in Barnet, the scene of a bloody Yorkist victory in 1471, the duo finds that a modern golf course has altered the landscape so dramatically that it is virtually impossible to find any traces of the battle. The hunt for a medieval grave-pit in Shrewsbury also ends in disappointment. However, at Flodden their excavations unearth some quite compelling new material to explain how the English vanquished the Scottish king James IV in 1513. While hardly in the same league as Richard Holmes or Simon Schama, Pollard and Oliver clearly know their stuff and their zest for the grubby, hands-on graft of archaeology is admirably communicated here. --Travis Elborough

thank you graham hancock, 16 Dec 2007
you do the general public a great service by questioning the mainstream of historians views on civilisations and well history on a whole, i found this book fantastic enlightening scary questionable but most importantly solid his works are well studied and seen first hand. and it will make you re think the history of human civilisation. i for one admire people like graham hancock who arnt afraid to push the bounderies of the incredible acheivments our ancient ancestors discoverd and built where as the mainstream comunity describe them as un civilised barbarians. i recomend this book to every human beign on the planet.

Great entertainment, 29 Jul 2007
Whether you subscribe to Hancock's theories or not, there is no denying that this is an excellent read, thoroughly well-researched and written in an engaging and involving way.

Personally, I felt that the book should have sought to ask some of its questions without then feeling the need to speculate wildly to answer them. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating read and this new edition is worth the money even if you have the original.

General Comment, 05 Dec 2006
The Antikythera Mechanism to reveiwed on C4 12th DECEMBER
has only now been deciphered in its working. This is a mechanism which is over 2000 years old, Hancock will be over the moon about something that according to some little grey cells could never exist.....

Good Hokum, 24 Jul 2006
Firstly the author is a journalist by trade and not an academic historian. Many of the suppositions are based on dubious or discredited sources and are made to fit the author's theories.

The book starts with ancient maps apparently accurately showing Antarctica which wasn't supposed to have been discovered till 1818. This includes the famous Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513 whose author claims it was based on reconstructions of ancient maps, omitting the copying errors (although there is no evidence of these supposed copying errors). The Piri Reis map itself is grossly inaccurate and its sources may only date to the 14th or 15th century and not Hancock's mythical date of 10,500BC. The coastline is vaguely accurate but the interior was probably imaginary as was often the case in this era.

Hancock claims a carving in the ancient Bolivian city of Tiwanaku shows an elephant that died out 12,000 years ago, but as Prof. James Bailey points out it is more likely a more recent carving of a parrot. Hancock claims an elephant is more likely due to the supposed date of Tiwanaku being 17,000 years ago, based on the 1940s surveys of Prof. Arthur Posnansky although this antiquity is unproven.

This book is full of `maybes' and `could have beens' but lacking in `proofs'. It makes a good story, but conventional history it isn't.


Your Journey Begins Here, 22 Jun 2006
What can I say, this book is fantastic!

The first few chapters were hard going but once Hancock has given you the facts you need he leads you all over the world on one hell of a journey.

If you read this book before any other on this subject matter you will be perfectly set up to have your eyes forced open at the possibility that what has gone before isn't quite what you thought.

The past is history...

Life below ground, 06 Apr 2008
In May 2006, Andrew Robertshaw and I stood in Avril William's Ocean Villas tea rooms at Auchonvilliers. Andy told me the story of a British Soldier whose remains had been discovered at serre in 2003, and that amongst his possedcions were coins from Jersey, my home. Whilist everyone might not be lucky enough to be informed and inspired by the man himself, this book will run a close second. No Man's Land groupfirst came to genral notice because of the TV programmes Finding the Fallen and Trench Detectives. This book details the groups objectives and takes the reader through the life of a soldier in the trenches on the Western Front of the Great War. the book starts with a good basic explanation of archeological techniques, the relevance of finds and how they can support the historical record of the times. The text may also change the widley held preconcived ideas of the Great War held by many. The book also deals with the moraltity of excavating those who died within (just) living memory and the problems facing those who live in an area that some se a sacred site, for others just where they live. Far from an academic tome the text is sprinkled with dry humour and sharp comments, this plus the illustrations make it a must read for anyone who visits the area. Walk softly, you not on whom you may be treading.

Lightweight and unsatisfactory, 21 Jun 2007
I agree with the reviewers "Not Great" and "A Waste of Money". This is a set book for the 1st year of the Open University Classics MA, which I am currently taking, and I find it very lightweight and frustrating. There is nothing to get your teeth into - no case studies (unlike the Renfrew and Bahn book) and nothing to get you thinking and working at the subject. Cannot understand why the OU chose this as their set book rather than Renfrew and Bahn. To be fair to Greene I suspect that the OU course designers didn't even read this book as they refer in their course notes to a 'case study' of the Roman fort at Corbridge which simply isn't in the book - as I said there are no case studies. To any budding archaeology students, if you have a choice go for the Renfrew and Bahn book and give this one a miss.

A good all round synopsis, 10 Apr 2007
This book does not go to deeply into the subject in most instances but it does cover a wide range of subjects and works well with the accompanying website. Yes the Renfrew and Bahn book is much more comprehensive but nowhere near as easy to read.

Get it, it has to be one of the core books along with Renfrew and Bahn

Damn good book, by a damn good lecturer, 30 Sep 2003
Contrary, to the belief of most of the reviewers it is a good book and very useful to theose studying Archaeology, it is especially useful if you happen to study at Newcatle Uni where Kevin Greene himself works and lectures, especially if he takes all of your Archaeology Lectures, as he does with us, as the book ties in with the scheme of work. Even so i bought this book long before i decided to go to Newcastle and it helped me to understand the subject better. Personally this has to be on every archaeology students bookshelf, a winner.

Not great, 26 Mar 2003
I felt this book was actually quite poor. If you would like to read a good general introduction to archaeology, or you are a first year archaeology student, the Renfrew & Bahn's 'Archaeology' is far superior, has a global perpective (as a book on archaeology should) and represents better value for money.

Review of ''Archaeology: an Introduction'', 05 Aug 2002
This is a fantastic book, which can be best described as the bible for all lovers of archaeology. As an archaeology student at university I found this book full to the brim with essential information that every budding archaeologist must have.
The book is well planned out and each chapter leads well into the other. When reading the book you can feel your knowledge of the subject build after every page is turned. The book covers every thing from techniques needed in the field to detailed coverage of previous excavations.
One of the highlights of the book is the superb drawings and sketches that break up the book into easy digestible pieces.
In all this is a must book for all that love the subject.

Excellent for students, 15 Sep 2005
Every student does it - you get your reading list and you go and buy everything on it, then you never even glance at most of the books again as they sit forlornly on the shelf, gathering dust.

Well, if this book is on your reading list then please, don't leave it on the bookshelf; pick it up and read it. Unlike most textbooks on the subject, this book is not overwhelmingly long. You can easily read a chapter on your chosen subject in depth in about half an hour - perfect for those last-minute essays!

Because of its size it is obviously not a comprehensive look at Archaeology - for that I suggest Renfrew and Bahn's Archaeology: Theory and Practice - but it is definitely one of the best starter books for students new to Archaeology.

Archaeological theory - Matthew Johnson, 17 Aug 2005
As an archaeology undergraduate, this is without doubt one of the best introductions to archaeological theory I have come across. Matthew Johnson uses a style that is both witty, incisive and informative. Complex issues are carefully explained and examples are critically chosen.

In addition to an entertaining and informative text, there is an extensive 'further reading' section which refers the reader to more detailed works, a large bibliography, detailed index and selective glossary.

I was a newcomer to the subject, but Johnson's style soon made me feel at home, and provided me with a springboard into further and more detailed reading. I would heartily recommend this book to students of archaeology at all levels.

Everything you need to know...., 10 Mar 2005
And more. This is an excellent text book - easily the best I've purchased in my 3 years of university study.

Johnson covers the history of archaeological thought, the different theoretical schools in archaeology and anthropological/social sciences and everything else that you need to know about archaeological theory. All written in a very engaging and entertaining style; Johnson even manages to keep the normally dry topics interesting.

If you're an archaeology student, BUY THIS BOOK! You won't need any other on this topic.

A most worthy guide to the basics of archaeological theory, 23 Feb 2000
Johnson's book stands alone within the field of archaeological theory. It has the honorable title of being the most accessible book on archaeological theory, without doubt.

Contained within its pages is a text aimed at students, and those who need an easy to read guide to archaeological theory. It is written in a way as to explain why theory is relevant, something I questioned before reading this book.

Not only does he address all the relevant questions and themes in archaeological theory, but he does it in a manner that can be understood by someone with no grounding in theory whatsoever. Having some prior knowledge is useful, but unlike books such as Trigger's "A History of Archaeological Thought" (1989) it is not essential.

Obviously for a book of 200 pages, it does not go into huge detail about the topics it covers (pretty much all of them!) but it acts as a superb introduction, which is its purpose. Having read the relevant chapter in Johnson, one can move onto more detailed texts, which are far less accessible.

The only criticism I have for the book is its index, which could cover more terms that are mentioned in the book. However, with a good contents page, it is easy to find the chapter relating to the desired topic, and unlike most texts it is not a chore to read up to the point you need.

Therefore, this book is essential reading for anyone doing work on theory in archaeology, and should sit on the bookshelf of anyone who would ever need to know anything about the subject - something about just about every topic will be in there somewhere!

Ideal book for anyone interested in archaeology., 18 Nov 2001
This book is a very good introduction to air photographs for both students and anyone interested in archaeology. It has a very good section on the history of air photos, and how to interpret them. The best section is the one on false and modern sites, and how not to interpret a WWII site as a medieval one!

Superb book, one of those must have titles., 08 Dec 2007
In every hobby or subjsect there is usually one book that becomes the Bible of that subject, I think this book is it for flintknapping. Ive read many others, nothing comes close to this!

A comprehensive guide & a good read, 30 Oct 2004
Whilst the book does go into more detail than most people would be looking for (I guess), the book is well written, very interesting and covers the basics as well as the advanced stuff so that anyone can get started in flintknapping. Lots of archaeological information and cross-references for those taking it more seriously. Buy it!

Simply superb, 04 Sep 2003
I knew nothing about flintknapping until I bought this book. I may get round to trying some knapping soon but right now I'm enjoying the book so much I cant put it down! Its technical but written to make the whole subject instantly crystal clear and with the ability to draw the reader in. Very enjoyable and informative.

Flintknapping - John Whittaker, 15 May 2003
Generally an excellent work. Will be of great use to the archaeological student, expert or novice flintknapper.
The author clearly defines boundaries between researched material and opinion. In several cases giving an opinion but ensuring that where others disagree with this there are the relevant argumants and references.
Superb bibliography and references section.
Where it is lacking, if anywhere, is in basic instruction diagrammes; these could be a little more step-by-step in order that novices (like me) could fiollow them more easily.

An excellent choice for both novice and expert., 26 Mar 2000
If I could only have one book on flintknapping, this would be it; if I could have several, this would be one of them. Quite simply, this is the best of all the titles on the subject that I have read. As a complete novice, starting to knap as a hobby using Sussex flint, I have had no one to turn to for advice and so have had to learn from the texts. I have read all the titles currently available and found this to the best.

Taking the beginner from the very basics, through all techniques, and then concluding by putting it all into context with examples, it serves as an excellent all rounder. Whilst I have improved the standard of my knapping, I still keep it by me for reference and assistance.

Knapping has become my primary hobby and in no small part my ability comes from the pages of John Whitakers' book. An excellent read and an excellent technical source.

A great guide to non-intrusive hightech archaeology., 18 Aug 2001
Clark manages to write about the methods used extensively both in academic and industrial archaeology in a way that holds the interest of any archaeologist even if he or she doesn't understand the science behind the technique. If the science is of interest it is explained but written in a manner it can easily be skipped by those disinterested. He charts the history of archaeological survey from General Pitt-Rivers's hitting the ground with hammers and listening for odd echos right through till today. He also adds the indispensible (for student at least) aid of many examples of where these techniques have and have not worked and importantly why. Whether an amateur archaeologist or a student this book is not only helpfull but also interesting as many science books are not.

Excellent but not the best, 21 Dec 2006
This book is very good and has stood the test of time as an excellent archaeological manual. However, there is a book that rivals it. Roskams' Excavation is part of the Cambridge Manuals series and is also well worth a look. Used in conjunction these books provide an excellent knowledge base for archaeological excavation.

Neccessary kit for the archaeologist., 08 Mar 2001
If you're aiming for a qualification in the archaeological field, or attempting anything in practical excavation or alike, you need this book! It's widely regarded as the last word on the subject, and I haven't found a text to beat it yet. It's very comprehensive, and well explained, with illustrations as well as an abundance of textual information - though not designed as a quick reference. If you're involved with practical archaeology or taking any sort of qualification in archaeology you will need this somewhere along the line. And to reiterate again; it's the most important book on practical archaeology around today, and you'll be missing a huge chunk on understanding the practicalities of archaeology if you haven't read it. It's perhaps not a book for those with just a casual interest in the field, but of interest to the keen amateur.