not as good as Fear but still very good, 02 Dec 2007
Not as over the top or as wildly entertaining as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but still very well written and highly entertaining. You don't get bland prose from the Doctor, and does it get any better than phrases such as "young blondes with lobotomy eyes"? This book is about 40 years old, and the reader certainly gets a feel for the 1960s, but I wouldn't at all call it, or Fear and Loathing, dated. The book is anecdotally driven, there are a lot of highly amusing stories with the bikers, and the bikers don't come across to me as completely unlikeable. If you like Fear and Loathing, you'll probably like this book too, although it's not as wacky and wild. Author of Adjust Your Brain: A Practical Theory for Maximizing Mental Health.

Superb, 20 Mar 2007
HST gives a real insight into the biker culture which really took off in the 1960s, and which eventually spilled over to a degree into the UK. It is an intriguing look behind an often closed and misunderstood brotherhood, and HST does not pull his punches. He neither deifies or demonises the people he meets and parties with, he just tells it like it is, and the result is a compelling and very enlightening view of the the Angels.
I would recommend this to anyone who has preconceived ideas about the bikers and their lifestyle, good or bad, as I am sure that it will open your eyes to a sometimes uncomfortable set of truths.

Origins of Gonzo, 24 Feb 2007
I have read most published HST and this is where it all started. This is closer to traditonal reporting than most of the later books but none the worse for it. Hunter is of course the star of the book (as always)but faced with the raw outlaw behaviour of the Angels he appears as the relative straight guy, (which is pretty remarkable if you know Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas). The focus of the book is actually one weekend that HST spent with the Angels and most of the remainder is entertaining analysis of the hysterical "Square" reaction in the press to other events that he did not witness. Throw in an LSD party with Ken Kesey and Allan Ginsberg just before Kesey skipped off to South America and i think you get the picture.

Excellent., 06 May 2005
I thoroughly enjoyed this book - the 'Gonzo' style of journalism, the underlying political references and the overall honesty make this a highly readable book. The time spent with the 'Angels and the trust that develops (on both sides) as a result of this, gives you a unique insight into both the Author's and the Subject's way of life. Interesting to see the 'Press / Authority as Antagonist' angle too.

H.S. Thompson., 07 Mar 2005
it was some bad crazziness, but Hunter.s. Thompson Hell's Angels happens to be one of the finest books i believe i have read. Although it does not have the harsh, riped and savage dissection of human morals that Fear and Loathing in las Vegas has and is, Thompson provides a fine exapmple of his own genre of Gonzo. the unique perseptive of American culture and the realities of a drug fueled and boozed up segment of a society to which they where an affront provided moments of great enterttianment. (The drug diet of one angel and his subsiquent consomption had me crippled.) Any way i believe it neccessary for any one who loves Thompson, or even Hemmingway or Burgess to read Hell's Angels and every other Thompson publication.

not as good as Fear but still very good, 02 Dec 2007
Not as over the top or as wildly entertaining as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but still very well written and highly entertaining. You don't get bland prose from the Doctor, and does it get any better than phrases such as "young blondes with lobotomy eyes"? This book is about 40 years old, and the reader certainly gets a feel for the 1960s, but I wouldn't at all call it, or Fear and Loathing, dated. The book is anecdotally driven, there are a lot of highly amusing stories with the bikers, and the bikers don't come across to me as completely unlikeable. If you like Fear and Loathing, you'll probably like this book too, although it's not as wacky and wild. Author of Adjust Your Brain: A Practical Theory for Maximizing Mental Health.

Superb, 20 Mar 2007
HST gives a real insight into the biker culture which really took off in the 1960s, and which eventually spilled over to a degree into the UK. It is an intriguing look behind an often closed and misunderstood brotherhood, and HST does not pull his punches. He neither deifies or demonises the people he meets and parties with, he just tells it like it is, and the result is a compelling and very enlightening view of the the Angels.
I would recommend this to anyone who has preconceived ideas about the bikers and their lifestyle, good or bad, as I am sure that it will open your eyes to a sometimes uncomfortable set of truths.

Origins of Gonzo, 24 Feb 2007
I have read most published HST and this is where it all started. This is closer to traditonal reporting than most of the later books but none the worse for it. Hunter is of course the star of the book (as always)but faced with the raw outlaw behaviour of the Angels he appears as the relative straight guy, (which is pretty remarkable if you know Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas). The focus of the book is actually one weekend that HST spent with the Angels and most of the remainder is entertaining analysis of the hysterical "Square" reaction in the press to other events that he did not witness. Throw in an LSD party with Ken Kesey and Allan Ginsberg just before Kesey skipped off to South America and i think you get the picture.

Excellent., 06 May 2005
I thoroughly enjoyed this book - the 'Gonzo' style of journalism, the underlying political references and the overall honesty make this a highly readable book. The time spent with the 'Angels and the trust that develops (on both sides) as a result of this, gives you a unique insight into both the Author's and the Subject's way of life. Interesting to see the 'Press / Authority as Antagonist' angle too.

H.S. Thompson., 07 Mar 2005
it was some bad crazziness, but Hunter.s. Thompson Hell's Angels happens to be one of the finest books i believe i have read. Although it does not have the harsh, riped and savage dissection of human morals that Fear and Loathing in las Vegas has and is, Thompson provides a fine exapmple of his own genre of Gonzo. the unique perseptive of American culture and the realities of a drug fueled and boozed up segment of a society to which they where an affront provided moments of great enterttianment. (The drug diet of one angel and his subsiquent consomption had me crippled.) Any way i believe it neccessary for any one who loves Thompson, or even Hemmingway or Burgess to read Hell's Angels and every other Thompson publication.

Surprisingly boring, 30 Nov 2002
In this book Hunter presents the Hell's Angels in a more postive light at a time when the rest of the US media were portraying the Angels as the most evil people on the planet. However, this is a pretty dull book, with all sorts of terribly boring sections on the history of motorbikes and the rituals of the different Hell's Angels gangs. Because the book follows a more conventional journalistic style it lacks the vitality and passion of Hunter's later works.

A book that actually put the Angels in a "good light", 30 Jan 2002
This is certainly an interesting read and who better to cast his eye over the last outlaw group of the 20th century than one of the original outlaw journalists. This is a very entertaining read and I would reccomend this to anybody who lives any kind of "alternative" lifestyle. However once you have read this you must read Hells Angel by Sonny Barger who is mentioned throughout this book and reading his book you notice that Thompson's book is not quite as good as it first seems so read it before you read Sonny's. Enjoy

Hunter's got balls, 11 Jul 2001
Hunter S. Thompson goes where no other journalists dare. A great read if you're interested in the Hell's Angels. I loved it.

Hanging with the home boys - Angel style, 21 Aug 2000
An in depth look at the life and times of the Oakland Angels. From their roots, through to the end...the end for Thompson that is. HST rides with the baddest, ever aware that things could turn ugly at any moment. Ever aware that the Angels could turn on him if they ever got the notion that he was exploiting them. Until, in the end, they do and Thompson gets a proper stomping.

Something of a halfway house, 25 Jul 2000
A decent enough read, but not one of his better books. I think the big problem with this is the format: if he doesn't have a deadline he seems to find it difficult to generate any kind of pace or impetus and the end result is pithy and fragmented. The first few chapters are remarkably 'straight' accounts of life with the Angels, followed by a looser style that still retains a strong reportage feel to it. He finishes with some absolute gems: classic Thompson, letting rip on the Angels. this is a transitional book, and you can see where he's trying new things out, but it doesn't always come off, and lacks the energy of his later political stuff.

not as good as Fear but still very good, 02 Dec 2007
Not as over the top or as wildly entertaining as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but still very well written and highly entertaining. You don't get bland prose from the Doctor, and does it get any better than phrases such as "young blondes with lobotomy eyes"? This book is about 40 years old, and the reader certainly gets a feel for the 1960s, but I wouldn't at all call it, or Fear and Loathing, dated. The book is anecdotally driven, there are a lot of highly amusing stories with the bikers, and the bikers don't come across to me as completely unlikeable. If you like Fear and Loathing, you'll probably like this book too, although it's not as wacky and wild. Author of Adjust Your Brain: A Practical Theory for Maximizing Mental Health.

Superb, 20 Mar 2007
HST gives a real insight into the biker culture which really took off in the 1960s, and which eventually spilled over to a degree into the UK. It is an intriguing look behind an often closed and misunderstood brotherhood, and HST does not pull his punches. He neither deifies or demonises the people he meets and parties with, he just tells it like it is, and the result is a compelling and very enlightening view of the the Angels.
I would recommend this to anyone who has preconceived ideas about the bikers and their lifestyle, good or bad, as I am sure that it will open your eyes to a sometimes uncomfortable set of truths.

Origins of Gonzo, 24 Feb 2007
I have read most published HST and this is where it all started. This is closer to traditonal reporting than most of the later books but none the worse for it. Hunter is of course the star of the book (as always)but faced with the raw outlaw behaviour of the Angels he appears as the relative straight guy, (which is pretty remarkable if you know Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas). The focus of the book is actually one weekend that HST spent with the Angels and most of the remainder is entertaining analysis of the hysterical "Square" reaction in the press to other events that he did not witness. Throw in an LSD party with Ken Kesey and Allan Ginsberg just before Kesey skipped off to South America and i think you get the picture.

Excellent., 06 May 2005
I thoroughly enjoyed this book - the 'Gonzo' style of journalism, the underlying political references and the overall honesty make this a highly readable book. The time spent with the 'Angels and the trust that develops (on both sides) as a result of this, gives you a unique insight into both the Author's and the Subject's way of life. Interesting to see the 'Press / Authority as Antagonist' angle too.

H.S. Thompson., 07 Mar 2005
it was some bad crazziness, but Hunter.s. Thompson Hell's Angels happens to be one of the finest books i believe i have read. Although it does not have the harsh, riped and savage dissection of human morals that Fear and Loathing in las Vegas has and is, Thompson provides a fine exapmple of his own genre of Gonzo. the unique perseptive of American culture and the realities of a drug fueled and boozed up segment of a society to which they where an affront provided moments of great enterttianment. (The drug diet of one angel and his subsiquent consomption had me crippled.) Any way i believe it neccessary for any one who loves Thompson, or even Hemmingway or Burgess to read Hell's Angels and every other Thompson publication.

Surprisingly boring, 30 Nov 2002
In this book Hunter presents the Hell's Angels in a more postive light at a time when the rest of the US media were portraying the Angels as the most evil people on the planet. However, this is a pretty dull book, with all sorts of terribly boring sections on the history of motorbikes and the rituals of the different Hell's Angels gangs. Because the book follows a more conventional journalistic style it lacks the vitality and passion of Hunter's later works.

A book that actually put the Angels in a "good light", 30 Jan 2002
This is certainly an interesting read and who better to cast his eye over the last outlaw group of the 20th century than one of the original outlaw journalists. This is a very entertaining read and I would reccomend this to anybody who lives any kind of "alternative" lifestyle. However once you have read this you must read Hells Angel by Sonny Barger who is mentioned throughout this book and reading his book you notice that Thompson's book is not quite as good as it first seems so read it before you read Sonny's. Enjoy

Hunter's got balls, 11 Jul 2001
Hunter S. Thompson goes where no other journalists dare. A great read if you're interested in the Hell's Angels. I loved it.

Hanging with the home boys - Angel style, 21 Aug 2000
An in depth look at the life and times of the Oakland Angels. From their roots, through to the end...the end for Thompson that is. HST rides with the baddest, ever aware that things could turn ugly at any moment. Ever aware that the Angels could turn on him if they ever got the notion that he was exploiting them. Until, in the end, they do and Thompson gets a proper stomping.

Something of a halfway house, 25 Jul 2000
A decent enough read, but not one of his better books. I think the big problem with this is the format: if he doesn't have a deadline he seems to find it difficult to generate any kind of pace or impetus and the end result is pithy and fragmented. The first few chapters are remarkably 'straight' accounts of life with the Angels, followed by a looser style that still retains a strong reportage feel to it. He finishes with some absolute gems: classic Thompson, letting rip on the Angels. this is a transitional book, and you can see where he's trying new things out, but it doesn't always come off, and lacks the energy of his later political stuff.

Old hat, 30 May 2007
This book was first published 11 years ago but most of the content has been debunked by recent academic research most recently by the Curator of the Masonic museum of Scotland (i forget the actual name but no doubt you can Goggle it) who really does show that this decade old stuff is more or less rubbish. By all means buy this book to understand what The Rosslyn Hoax? debunks otherwise it is a waste of money.

"It's stories I'm telling you", 28 Sep 2006
Like one of the previous reviewers I have come to realise that this book has it's pitfalls. Poorly squared conclusions, leaps of imagination and to an extent an agenda that drives the narrative. But to those who attack it's content with all the vigour of the inquisition I would say this, "what are you so scared of?"

It is obvious to the discerning reader, as one reviewer states, that this book is not the first or the final word on the subject matter discussed, and as such it should be taken for what it is instead of being taken as THE definative explanation. So what is this book about.

This is a book about the journey two pretty normal, pretty well educated guys took when they decided to investigate the history of Freemasonry. What transpired, to them, was a meandering, tangled web route through the history of not just Freemasonry but also it's roots, the crusades, the Egyptian dynasties, the church and the historical figure most people in the west associate with the name Jesus Christ and much more to boot. I won't spend time pointlessly trying to de-bunk or bolster their claims, although it must be noted that the authors have revised their opinions regarding much they uncovered since publication.

What I got from this book was an awareness that what I believed about accepted history could be, in fact, wrong. Also it gave me a greater understanding about what history is and motivated me investigate it further. It would be churlish to thank the authors for anything other than their efforts. Whilst I freely admit that I, on first reading this book got carried away and carried along on the crest of it's wave; I can certainly now say I don't think this book is "groundbreaking" - "mind altering" or any of the other superlatives used to describe it; and if upon reading it, you think it is, you have failed as this poor reviewer had to take from this book what is valuable.

The study history is not static and historians, mainstream or otherwise, are not so magnanimous as to not have vested interests.
History is not like a vein of gold you can follow down a particular seam of rock, you have to go and make sure it's gold - and then you have to go and make sure the guy who told you so is reliable: in short it is an evolving process.
Read this book if you have an interest in history or religion, and then go on and read some others. You take the good where you can find it and you fit it to what you know. Those who forget to arm themselves with a healthy pinch of salt, for those times when it is needed, really deserve all that they get.


A Key Read, 25 Sep 2006
Highly recommended to those interested in Freemasonry, what one must remember is that this is written from the perspective of members of the craft and as such, large parts of their research should be taken seriously.

As with so many books in this genre however, there does appear to be convenient connections between elements of the story. Whatever your opinion of this, it must be said that the links to ancient Egypt are a fascinating eye-opener to the practices of the time and how easily that culture can be related to Western civilisation, for which it would appear that those within the hermetic societies have had an enormous hand in undertaking.

If you are of sceptical or cynical mind related to these kinds of societies, then you should steer clear of this book. But if you are open-minded or have some kind of connection to or interest in Freemasonry, it makes for a fascinating read.

Where is the Bibliography?, 01 Jan 2006
I find this book very good! It uses a lot of knowledge, and makes some new conclusions, that probably should have been made years ago.
BUT I am really missing the bibliography. When I read a book, I like to check the sources or just write down some books to read in the future. But without the bibliography, this is almost impossible. My old history teacher would have failed me if I forgot the bibliography.

But all in all the book is exciting, well-written and it gives you an appetite for more information on the subject,

A classic Opinionated Book, 24 Nov 2005
The book started quite a little informative until it began to do the obvious. Then on it simply related all things it finds to Freemasonry.

And has become freewheeling in conjurating all it gets its hands into to masonry practises and principle, if we can call it that.

It has even not understood what it has perhaps gathered, but most of it has been already written and analysed long time ago.

It is just right that most are really beyond the understanding of such ordinary thinking men. So they just conjure and conjure and conjure and conjure.

At the end it has become nonsense. Luckily the masters of old have done a good job of encoding the real teachings. Now beyond the conjuration of such men as the authors.

not as good as Fear but still very good, 02 Dec 2007
Not as over the top or as wildly entertaining as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but still very well written and highly entertaining. You don't get bland prose from the Doctor, and does it get any better than phrases such as "young blondes with lobotomy eyes"? This book is about 40 years old, and the reader certainly gets a feel for the 1960s, but I wouldn't at all call it, or Fear and Loathing, dated. The book is anecdotally driven, there are a lot of highly amusing stories with the bikers, and the bikers don't come across to me as completely unlikeable. If you like Fear and Loathing, you'll probably like this book too, although it's not as wacky and wild. Author of Adjust Your Brain: A Practical Theory for Maximizing Mental Health.

Superb, 20 Mar 2007
HST gives a real insight into the biker culture which really took off in the 1960s, and which eventually spilled over to a degree into the UK. It is an intriguing look behind an often closed and misunderstood brotherhood, and HST does not pull his punches. He neither deifies or demonises the people he meets and parties with, he just tells it like it is, and the result is a compelling and very enlightening view of the the Angels.
I would recommend this to anyone who has preconceived ideas about the bikers and their lifestyle, good or bad, as I am sure that it will open your eyes to a sometimes uncomfortable set of truths.

Origins of Gonzo, 24 Feb 2007
I have read most published HST and this is where it all started. This is closer to traditonal reporting than most of the later books but none the worse for it. Hunter is of course the star of the book (as always)but faced with the raw outlaw behaviour of the Angels he appears as the relative straight guy, (which is pretty remarkable if you know Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas). The focus of the book is actually one weekend that HST spent with the Angels and most of the remainder is entertaining analysis of the hysterical "Square" reaction in the press to other events that he did not witness. Throw in an LSD party with Ken Kesey and Allan Ginsberg just before Kesey skipped off to South America and i think you get the picture.

Excellent., 06 May 2005
I thoroughly enjoyed this book - the 'Gonzo' style of journalism, the underlying political references and the overall honesty make this a highly readable book. The time spent with the 'Angels and the trust that develops (on both sides) as a result of this, gives you a unique insight into both the Author's and the Subject's way of life. Interesting to see the 'Press / Authority as Antagonist' angle too.

H.S. Thompson., 07 Mar 2005
it was some bad crazziness, but Hunter.s. Thompson Hell's Angels happens to be one of the finest books i believe i have read. Although it does not have the harsh, riped and savage dissection of human morals that Fear and Loathing in las Vegas has and is, Thompson provides a fine exapmple of his own genre of Gonzo. the unique perseptive of American culture and the realities of a drug fueled and boozed up segment of a society to which they where an affront provided moments of great enterttianment. (The drug diet of one angel and his subsiquent consomption had me crippled.) Any way i believe it neccessary for any one who loves Thompson, or even Hemmingway or Burgess to read Hell's Angels and every other Thompson publication.

Surprisingly boring, 30 Nov 2002
In this book Hunter presents the Hell's Angels in a more postive light at a time when the rest of the US media were portraying the Angels as the most evil people on the planet. However, this is a pretty dull book, with all sorts of terribly boring sections on the history of motorbikes and the rituals of the different Hell's Angels gangs. Because the book follows a more conventional journalistic style it lacks the vitality and passion of Hunter's later works.

A book that actually put the Angels in a "good light", 30 Jan 2002
This is certainly an interesting read and who better to cast his eye over the last outlaw group of the 20th century than one of the original outlaw journalists. This is a very entertaining read and I would reccomend this to anybody who lives any kind of "alternative" lifestyle. However once you have read this you must read Hells Angel by Sonny Barger who is mentioned throughout this book and reading his book you notice that Thompson's book is not quite as good as it first seems so read it before you read Sonny's. Enjoy

Hunter's got balls, 11 Jul 2001
Hunter S. Thompson goes where no other journalists dare. A great read if you're interested in the Hell's Angels. I loved it.

Hanging with the home boys - Angel style, 21 Aug 2000
An in depth look at the life and times of the Oakland Angels. From their roots, through to the end...the end for Thompson that is. HST rides with the baddest, ever aware that things could turn ugly at any moment. Ever aware that the Angels could turn on him if they ever got the notion that he was exploiting them. Until, in the end, they do and Thompson gets a proper stomping.

Something of a halfway house, 25 Jul 2000
A decent enough read, but not one of his better books. I think the big problem with this is the format: if he doesn't have a deadline he seems to find it difficult to generate any kind of pace or impetus and the end result is pithy and fragmented. The first few chapters are remarkably 'straight' accounts of life with the Angels, followed by a looser style that still retains a strong reportage feel to it. He finishes with some absolute gems: classic Thompson, letting rip on the Angels. this is a transitional book, and you can see where he's trying new things out, but it doesn't always come off, and lacks the energy of his later political stuff.

Old hat, 30 May 2007
This book was first published 11 years ago but most of the content has been debunked by recent academic research most recently by the Curator of the Masonic museum of Scotland (i forget the actual name but no doubt you can Goggle it) who really does show that this decade old stuff is more or less rubbish. By all means buy this book to understand what The Rosslyn Hoax? debunks otherwise it is a waste of money.

"It's stories I'm telling you", 28 Sep 2006
Like one of the previous reviewers I have come to realise that this book has it's pitfalls. Poorly squared conclusions, leaps of imagination and to an extent an agenda that drives the narrative. But to those who attack it's content with all the vigour of the inquisition I would say this, "what are you so scared of?"

It is obvious to the discerning reader, as one reviewer states, that this book is not the first or the final word on the subject matter discussed, and as such it should be taken for what it is instead of being taken as THE definative explanation. So what is this book about.

This is a book about the journey two pretty normal, pretty well educated guys took when they decided to investigate the history of Freemasonry. What transpired, to them, was a meandering, tangled web route through the history of not just Freemasonry but also it's roots, the crusades, the Egyptian dynasties, the church and the historical figure most people in the west associate with the name Jesus Christ and much more to boot. I won't spend time pointlessly trying to de-bunk or bolster their claims, although it must be noted that the authors have revised their opinions regarding much they uncovered since publication.

What I got from this book was an awareness that what I believed about accepted history could be, in fact, wrong. Also it gave me a greater understanding about what history is and motivated me investigate it further. It would be churlish to thank the authors for anything other than their efforts. Whilst I freely admit that I, on first reading this book got carried away and carried along on the crest of it's wave; I can certainly now say I don't think this book is "groundbreaking" - "mind altering" or any of the other superlatives used to describe it; and if upon reading it, you think it is, you have failed as this poor reviewer had to take from this book what is valuable.

The study history is not static and historians, mainstream or otherwise, are not so magnanimous as to not have vested interests.
History is not like a vein of gold you can follow down a particular seam of rock, you have to go and make sure it's gold - and then you have to go and make sure the guy who told you so is reliable: in short it is an evolving process.
Read this book if you have an interest in history or religion, and then go on and read some others. You take the good where you can find it and you fit it to what you know. Those who forget to arm themselves with a healthy pinch of salt, for those times when it is needed, really deserve all that they get.


A Key Read, 25 Sep 2006
Highly recommended to those interested in Freemasonry, what one must remember is that this is written from the perspective of members of the craft and as such, large parts of their research should be taken seriously.

As with so many books in this genre however, there does appear to be convenient connections between elements of the story. Whatever your opinion of this, it must be said that the links to ancient Egypt are a fascinating eye-opener to the practices of the time and how easily that culture can be related to Western civilisation, for which it would appear that those within the hermetic societies have had an enormous hand in undertaking.

If you are of sceptical or cynical mind related to these kinds of societies, then you should steer clear of this book. But if you are open-minded or have some kind of connection to or interest in Freemasonry, it makes for a fascinating read.

Where is the Bibliography?, 01 Jan 2006
I find this book very good! It uses a lot of knowledge, and makes some new conclusions, that probably should have been made years ago.
BUT I am really missing the bibliography. When I read a book, I like to check the sources or just write down some books to read in the future. But without the bibliography, this is almost impossible. My old history teacher would have failed me if I forgot the bibliography.

But all in all the book is exciting, well-written and it gives you an appetite for more information on the subject,

A classic Opinionated Book, 24 Nov 2005
The book started quite a little informative until it began to do the obvious. Then on it simply related all things it finds to Freemasonry.

And has become freewheeling in conjurating all it gets its hands into to masonry practises and principle, if we can call it that.

It has even not understood what it has perhaps gathered, but most of it has been already written and analysed long time ago.

It is just right that most are really beyond the understanding of such ordinary thinking men. So they just conjure and conjure and conjure and conjure.

At the end it has become nonsense. Luckily the masters of old have done a good job of encoding the real teachings. Now beyond the conjuration of such men as the authors.

Top Read!, 01 Apr 2008
Thoroughly enjoyed this book- I have read a lot of others, but this one doesn't seem to pull any wool over yer eyes, or hide the underlying trend-of-the-time, drugs! It holds credibility as having been written by an ex/ dishonoured Angel, and I admire his guts in doing so, but wouldnt want to be in his shoes right now!
All I can say? informative,Interesting,Seat of the pants and at some stages, quite touching - but it's very hard to completely distance yourself/cut off from humanity entirely, and I feel the Author expresses this in his telling.
Long and short, well worth a look, and with the price, well, if you hate it, then sell it on!
One I will read again.

A WAYWARD ANGEL, 25 Jun 2007
After reading 'The Life And Times Of Sonny Barger' this can be seen as the natural progression to continue the Hells Angel theme, Wethern puts a different twist on the inner workings of the Club and the clubs lust to live life on the edge of society, Motorcycles, drugs, Guns, women, partys, most men dream of and that only a few dedicated and chosen crazy folk can handle. Great reading, LONG LIVE Red and White.


Love this, 11 Jun 2007
I've read most of the Hells Angel true crime books and this one tops the list.

Easy to follow and read, you will find yourself on the back of the motorbike hanging on for dear life as the narrator takes us through life as a HA.

For all you hard-core bikers. This book will not disappoint.



What an eye opener!, 23 Jan 2007
The book starts with a fairly shocking opening which sums up the type of people involved with the Hells Angels at the time the account is set.

It really is fascinating to read first hand about tye types of activities, criminal and otherwise, these men were involved in. The account provides a realistic rather than romanticised view of the Hells Angels. Everything from gun and drug running to the extreme bond of 'brotherhood' and codes of honour they live by. Fascinating and unput-downable!

not as good as Fear but still very good, 02 Dec 2007
Not as over the top or as wildly entertaining as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but still very well written and highly entertaining. You don't get bland prose from the Doctor, and does it get any better than phrases such as "young blondes with lobotomy eyes"? This book is about 40 years old, and the reader certainly gets a feel for the 1960s, but I wouldn't at all call it, or Fear and Loathing, dated. The book is anecdotally driven, there are a lot of highly amusing stories with the bikers, and the bikers don't come across to me as completely unlikeable. If you like Fear and Loathing, you'll probably like this book too, although it's not as wacky and wild. Author of Adjust Your Brain: A Practical Theory for Maximizing Mental Health.

Superb, 20 Mar 2007
HST gives a real insight into the biker culture which really took off in the 1960s, and which eventually spilled over to a degree into the UK. It is an intriguing look behind an often closed and misunderstood brotherhood, and HST does not pull his punches. He neither deifies or demonises the people he meets and parties with, he just tells it like it is, and the result is a compelling and very enlightening view of the the Angels.
I would recommend this to anyone who has preconceived ideas about the bikers and their lifestyle, good or bad, as I am sure that it will open your eyes to a sometimes uncomfortable set of truths.

Origins of Gonzo, 24 Feb 2007
I have read most published HST and this is where it all started. This is closer to traditonal reporting than most of the later books but none the worse for it. Hunter is of course the star of the book (as always)but faced with the raw outlaw behaviour of the Angels he appears as the relative straight guy, (which is pretty remarkable if you know Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas). The focus of the book is actually one weekend that HST spent with the Angels and most of the remainder is entertaining analysis of the hysterical "Square" reaction in the press to other events that he did not witness. Throw in an LSD party with Ken Kesey and Allan Ginsberg just before Kesey skipped off to South America and i think you get the picture.

Excellent., 06 May 2005
I thoroughly enjoyed this book - the 'Gonzo' style of journalism, the underlying political references and the overall honesty make this a highly readable book. The time spent with the 'Angels and the trust that develops (on both sides) as a result of this, gives you a unique insight into both the Author's and the Subject's way of life. Interesting to see the 'Press / Authority as Antagonist' angle too.

H.S. Thompson., 07 Mar 2005
it was some bad crazziness, but Hunter.s. Thompson Hell's Angels happens to be one of the finest books i believe i have read. Although it does not have the harsh, riped and savage dissection of human morals that Fear and Loathing in las Vegas has and is, Thompson provides a fine exapmple of his own genre of Gonzo. the unique perseptive of American culture and the realities of a drug fueled and boozed up segment of a society to which they where an affront provided moments of great enterttianment. (The drug diet of one angel and his subsiquent consomption had me crippled.) Any way i believe it neccessary for any one who loves Thompson, or even Hemmingway or Burgess to read Hell's Angels and every other Thompson publication.

Surprisingly boring, 30 Nov 2002
In this book Hunter presents the Hell's Angels in a more postive light at a time when the rest of the US media were portraying the Angels as the most evil people on the planet. However, this is a pretty dull book, with all sorts of terribly boring sections on the history of motorbikes and the rituals of the different Hell's Angels gangs. Because the book follows a more conventional journalistic style it lacks the vitality and passion of Hunter's later works.

A book that actually put the Angels in a "good light", 30 Jan 2002
This is certainly an interesting read and who better to cast his eye over the last outlaw group of the 20th century than one of the original outlaw journalists. This is a very entertaining read and I would reccomend this to anybody who lives any kind of "alternative" lifestyle. However once you have read this you must read Hells Angel by Sonny Barger who is mentioned throughout this book and reading his book you notice that Thompson's book is not quite as good as it first seems so read it before you read Sonny's. Enjoy

Hunter's got balls, 11 Jul 2001
Hunter S. Thompson goes where no other journalists dare. A great read if you're interested in the Hell's Angels. I loved it.

Hanging with the home boys - Angel style, 21 Aug 2000
An in depth look at the life and times of the Oakland Angels. From their roots, through to the end...the end for Thompson that is. HST rides with the baddest, ever aware that things could turn ugly at any moment. Ever aware that the Angels could turn on him if they ever got the notion that he was exploiting them. Until, in the end, they do and Thompson gets a proper stomping.

Something of a halfway house, 25 Jul 2000
A decent enough read, but not one of his better books. I think the big problem with this is the format: if he doesn't have a deadline he seems to find it difficult to generate any kind of pace or impetus and the end result is pithy and fragmented. The first few chapters are remarkably 'straight' accounts of life with the Angels, followed by a looser style that still retains a strong reportage feel to it. He finishes with some absolute gems: classic Thompson, letting rip on the Angels. this is a transitional book, and you can see where he's trying new things out, but it doesn't always come off, and lacks the energy of his later political stuff.

Old hat, 30 May 2007
This book was first published 11 years ago but most of the content has been debunked by recent academic research most recently by the Curator of the Masonic museum of Scotland (i forget the actual name but no doubt you can Goggle it) who really does show that this decade old stuff is more or less rubbish. By all means buy this book to understand what The Rosslyn Hoax? debunks otherwise it is a waste of money.

"It's stories I'm telling you", 28 Sep 2006
Like one of the previous reviewers I have come to realise that this book has it's pitfalls. Poorly squared conclusions, leaps of imagination and to an extent an agenda that drives the narrative. But to those who attack it's content with all the vigour of the inquisition I would say this, "what are you so scared of?"

It is obvious to the discerning reader, as one reviewer states, that this book is not the first or the final word on the subject matter discussed, and as such it should be taken for what it is instead of being taken as THE definative explanation. So what is this book about.

This is a book about the journey two pretty normal, pretty well educated guys took when they decided to investigate the history of Freemasonry. What transpired, to them, was a meandering, tangled web route through the history of not just Freemasonry but also it's roots, the crusades, the Egyptian dynasties, the church and the historical figure most people in the west associate with the name Jesus Christ and much more to boot. I won't spend time pointlessly trying to de-bunk or bolster their claims, although it must be noted that the authors have revised their opinions regarding much they uncovered since publication.

What I got from this book was an awareness that what I believed about accepted history could be, in fact, wrong. Also it gave me a greater understanding about what history is and motivated me investigate it further. It would be churlish to thank the authors for anything other than their efforts. Whilst I freely admit that I, on first reading this book got carried away and carried along on the crest of it's wave; I can certainly now say I don't think this book is "groundbreaking" - "mind altering" or any of the other superlatives used to describe it; and if upon reading it, you think it is, you have failed as this poor reviewer had to take from this book what is valuable.

The study history is not static and historians, mainstream or otherwise, are not so magnanimous as to not have vested interests.
History is not like a vein of gold you can follow down a particular seam of rock, you have to go and make sure it's gold - and then you have to go and make sure the guy who told you so is reliable: in short it is an evolving process.
Read this book if you have an interest in history or religion, and then go on and read some others. You take the good where you can find it and you fit it to what you know. Those who forget to arm themselves with a healthy pinch of salt, for those times when it is needed, really deserve all that they get.


A Key Read, 25 Sep 2006
Highly recommended to those interested in Freemasonry, what one must remember is that this is written from the perspective of members of the craft and as such, large parts of their research should be taken seriously.

As with so many books in this genre however, there does appear to be convenient connections between elements of the story. Whatever your opinion of this, it must be said that the links to ancient Egypt are a fascinating eye-opener to the practices of the time and how easily that culture can be related to Western civilisation, for which it would appear that those within the hermetic societies have had an enormous hand in undertaking.

If you are of sceptical or cynical mind related to these kinds of societies, then you should steer clear of this book. But if you are open-minded or have some kind of connection to or interest in Freemasonry, it makes for a fascinating read.

Where is the Bibliography?, 01 Jan 2006
I find this book very good! It uses a lot of knowledge, and makes some new conclusions, that probably should have been made years ago.
BUT I am really missing the bibliography. When I read a book, I like to check the sources or just write down some books to read in the future. But without the bibliography, this is almost impossible. My old history teacher would have failed me if I forgot the bibliography.

But all in all the book is exciting, well-written and it gives you an appetite for more information on the subject,

A classic Opinionated Book, 24 Nov 2005
The book started quite a little informative until it began to do the obvious. Then on it simply related all things it finds to Freemasonry.

And has become freewheeling in conjurating all it gets its hands into to masonry practises and principle, if we can call it that.

It has even not understood what it has perhaps gathered, but most of it has been already written and analysed long time ago.

It is just right that most are really beyond the understanding of such ordinary thinking men. So they just conjure and conjure and conjure and conjure.

At the end it has become nonsense. Luckily the masters of old have done a good job of encoding the real teachings. Now beyond the conjuration of such men as the authors.

Top Read!, 01 Apr 2008
Thoroughly enjoyed this book- I have read a lot of others, but this one doesn't seem to pull any wool over yer eyes, or hide the underlying trend-of-the-time, drugs! It holds credibility as having been written by an ex/ dishonoured Angel, and I admire his guts in doing so, but wouldnt want to be in his shoes right now!
All I can say? informative,Interesting,Seat of the pants and at some stages, quite touching - but it's very hard to completely distance yourself/cut off from humanity entirely, and I feel the Author expresses this in his telling.
Long and short, well worth a look, and with the price, well, if you hate it, then sell it on!
One I will read again.

A WAYWARD ANGEL, 25 Jun 2007
After reading 'The Life And Times Of Sonny Barger' this can be seen as the natural progression to continue the Hells Angel theme, Wethern puts a different twist on the inner workings of the Club and the clubs lust to live life on the edge of society, Motorcycles, drugs, Guns, women, partys, most men dream of and that only a few dedicated and chosen crazy folk can handle. Great reading, LONG LIVE Red and White.


Love this, 11 Jun 2007
I've read most of the Hells Angel true crime books and this one tops the list.

Easy to follow and read, you will find yourself on the back of the motorbike hanging on for dear life as the narrator takes us through life as a HA.

For all you hard-core bikers. This book will not disappoint.



What an eye opener!, 23 Jan 2007
The book starts with a fairly shocking opening which sums up the type of people involved with the Hells Angels at the time the account is set.

It really is fascinating to read first hand about tye types of activities, criminal and otherwise, these men were involved in. The account provides a realistic rather than romanticised view of the Hells Angels. Everything from gun and drug running to the extreme bond of 'brotherhood' and codes of honour they live by. Fascinating and unput-downable!

Interesting, if true..., 26 Oct 2008
I agree with the mixed opinions expressed by other reviewers for this book. Jim Marrs has performed a staggering amount of research to write this, and the first quarter of the book really does open your eyes as to the various groups of people that seem to represent the "highest power". Its interesting how Marrs makes constant links back to the same people (Rockefellers, Rothschilds etc).
Sadly though I found this book a difficult read. Toward the end of the book there are so many people and parties named that I found it confusing. Also, I don't believe the book presents 'the hidden history that connects the Trilateral Commisions, The Freemasons'. It merely states that certain people of considerable power happened to be part of these various organisations, but stops there.
Also, as the book progresses the claims get more and more spectacular, moving onto alien races ruling the Egyptians. We cannot verify the accuracy of all these tales for obvious reasons, so I began to wonder just how elaborate these theories could get before they became rediculous. I would be fantastic to think that aliens really did build the pyramids etc, but its hard to believe with the existing evidence we have based on ancient texts that may not even be interpretted correctly, if indeed genuine to begin with.
I liked this book because it provides strong evidence that there are a select group of individuals who make the world's major decisions and value their wealth and power over human life (creating wars for profit etc). I believe that these people may also hold the answers to other points made in the book about our alien origins. However, its unlikely we will really find out these truths any time soon, so I kind of took the subject matter with a pinch of salt...!

Beyond the Looking Glass, 20 Dec 2007
This book is a phenomenal read. Personally, I don't think everything in it holds water, but this kind of broad-spectrum investigative journalism is a rare thing in todays corporate media. Marrs manages to paint the picture, in broad strokes and in detail when possible, that it is INDEED possible to rule by secrecy. Why would anyone want to decieve the world like that? Look at the history of humanity abd you have your answer. This is after all a planet, were the "leader of the free world" is the grand-son of fascist who participated in a failed coup against Roosevelt ans was later condemned under the Trading with the Enemy Act (yes, Prescott Bush had close ties with Fritz Thyssen).

The wealth and power wielded by these groups will make think revolutionary thoughts.

Enjoy, but read with healthy sceptisism. This book is truly thought provoking.

Makes you wonder..., 10 Feb 2004
This book is incredible. Anyone can fire off accusations of corruption to governments, but Marrs has researched this incredibly thoroughly. I know that sounds incredibly patronising but that's how I see it.

The final chapter details the theory of the 12th planet returning to our solar system, which is explored in his earlier book "Alien Agenda". If you're into conspiracy theories and not afraid to open your mind up to the shocking truth then you should check both of these books out. You'll never be the same again.

Gripping..., 08 Mar 2003
One I started this book, I just couldn't put it down! It details everything for anyone wanting to delve into the world of secret societies and conspiracies, from the kennedy assassination to the crusades. I was thoroughly entertained all the way through, so why did I give this only 4 stars?

Because the last chapter is just plain silly. It details the creation of mankind based on Sumerian myths and legends, and the author presents this as if it happened. This is just one example of how the author only presents one side of the story, and doesn't ever seem to even begin to think or even consider that perhaps some of this might not be true, or that some of the people he quotes might be a bit barmey (David Ike!).

I recommend buying this book, simply because it is so fascinating.

The world is governed by many different personages., 22 May 2002
Pure genius. This book is both interested me from start to finish, but it has also opened my mind to other things that are going on behind the scenes. The history of the Knights Templar, The priory of Sion, and the CFR are all looked at, some in more depth than others. This book is really worth reading, even if it’s just to find out how incestuous the ruling classes and leaders of the old world, and the new world were and are.

not as good as Fear but still very good, 02 Dec 2007
Not as over the top or as wildly entertaining as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but still very well written and highly entertaining. You don't get bland prose from the Doctor, and does it get any better than phrases such as "young blondes with lobotomy eyes"? This book is about 40 years old, and the reader certainly gets a feel for the 1960s, but I wouldn't at all call it, or Fear and Loathing, dated. The book is anecdotally driven, there are a lot of highly amusing stories with the bikers, and the bikers don't come across to me as completely unlikeable. If you like Fear and Loathing, you'll probably like this book too, although it's not as wacky and wild. Author of Adjust Your Brain: A Practical Theory for Maximizing Mental Health.

Superb, 20 Mar 2007
HST gives a real insight into the biker culture which really took off in the 1960s, and which eventually spilled over to a degree into the UK. It is an intriguing look behind an often closed and misunderstood brotherhood, and HST does not pull his punches. He neither deifies or demonises the people he meets and parties with, he just tells it like it is, and the result is a compelling and very enlightening view of the the Angels.
I would recommend this to anyone who has preconceived ideas about the bikers and their lifestyle, good or bad, as I am sure that it will open your eyes to a sometimes uncomfortable set of truths.

Origins of Gonzo, 24 Feb 2007
I have read most published HST and this is where it all started. This is closer to traditonal reporting than most of the later books but none the worse for it. Hunter is of course the star of the book (as always)but faced with the raw outlaw behaviour of the Angels he appears as the relative straight guy, (which is pretty remarkable if you know Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas). The focus of the book is actually one weekend that HST spent with the Angels and most of the remainder is entertaining analysis of the hysterical "Square" reaction in the press to other events that he did not witness. Throw in an LSD party with Ken Kesey and Allan Ginsberg just before Kesey skipped off to South America and i think you get the picture.

Excellent., 06 May 2005
I thoroughly enjoyed this book - the 'Gonzo' style of journalism, the underlying political references and the overall honesty make this a highly readable book. The time spent with the 'Angels and the trust that develops (on both sides) as a result of this, gives you a unique insight into both the Author's and the Subject's way of life. Interesting to see the 'Press / Authority as Antagonist' angle too.

H.S. Thompson., 07 Mar 2005
it was some bad crazziness, but Hunter.s. Thompson Hell's Angels happens to be one of the finest books i believe i have read. Although it does not have the harsh, riped and savage dissection of human morals that Fear and Loathing in las Vegas has and is, Thompson provides a fine exapmple of his own genre of Gonzo. the unique perseptive of American culture and the realities of a drug fueled and boozed up segment of a society to which they where an affront provided moments of great enterttianment. (The drug diet of one angel and his subsiquent consomption had me crippled.) Any way i believe it neccessary for any one who loves Thompson, or even Hemmingway or Burgess to read Hell's Angels and every other Thompson publication.

Surprisingly boring, 30 Nov 2002
In this book Hunter presents the Hell's Angels in a more postive light at a time when the rest of the US media were portraying the Angels as the most evil people on the planet. However, this is a pretty dull book, with all sorts of terribly boring sections on the history of motorbikes and the rituals of the different Hell's Angels gangs. Because the book follows a more conventional journalistic style it lacks the vitality and passion of Hunter's later works.

A book that actually put the Angels in a "good light", 30 Jan 2002
This is certainly an interesting read and who better to cast his eye over the last outlaw group of the 20th century than one of the original outlaw journalists. This is a very entertaining read and I would reccomend this to anybody who lives any kind of "alternative" lifestyle. However once you have read this you must read Hells Angel by Sonny Barger who is mentioned throughout this book and reading his book you notice that Thompson's book is not quite as good as it first seems so read it before you read Sonny's. Enjoy

Hunter's got balls, 11 Jul 2001
Hunter S. Thompson goes where no other journalists dare. A great read if you're interested in the Hell's Angels. I loved it.

Hanging with the home boys - Angel style, 21 Aug 2000
An in depth look at the life and times of the Oakland Angels. From their roots, through to the end...the end for Thompson that is. HST rides with the baddest, ever aware that things could turn ugly at any moment. Ever aware that the Angels could turn on him if they ever got the notion that he was exploiting them. Until, in the end, they do and Thompson gets a proper stomping.

Something of a halfway house, 25 Jul 2000
A decent enough read, but not one of his better books. I think the big problem with this is the format: if he doesn't have a deadline he seems to find it difficult to generate any kind of pace or impetus and the end result is pithy and fragmented. The first few chapters are remarkably 'straight' accounts of life with the Angels, followed by a looser style that still retains a strong reportage feel to it. He finishes with some absolute gems: classic Thompson, letting rip on the Angels. this is a transitional book, and you can see where he's trying new things out, but it doesn't always come off, and lacks the energy of his later political stuff.

Old hat, 30 May 2007
This book was first published 11 years ago but most of the content has been debunked by recent academic research most recently by the Curator of the Masonic museum of Scotland (i forget the actual name but no doubt you can Goggle it) who really does show that this decade old stuff is more or less rubbish. By all means buy this book to understand what The Rosslyn Hoax? debunks otherwise it is a waste of money.

"It's stories I'm telling you", 28 Sep 2006
Like one of the previous reviewers I have come to realise that this book has it's pitfalls. Poorly squared conclusions, leaps of imagination and to an extent an agenda that drives the narrative. But to those who attack it's content with all the vigour of the inquisition I would say this, "what are you so scared of?"

It is obvious to the discerning reader, as one reviewer states, that this book is not the first or the final word on the subject matter discussed, and as such it should be taken for what it is instead of being taken as THE definative explanation. So what is this book about.

This is a book about the journey two pretty normal, pretty well educated guys took when they decided to investigate the history of Freemasonry. What transpired, to them, was a meandering, tangled web route through the history of not just Freemasonry but also it's roots, the crusades, the Egyptian dynasties, the church and the historical figure most people in the west associate with the name Jesus Christ and much more to boot. I won't spend time pointlessly trying to de-bunk or bolster their claims, although it must be noted that the authors have revised their opinions regarding much they uncovered since publication.

What I got from this book was an awareness that what I believed about accepted history could be, in fact, wrong. Also it gave me a greater understanding about what history is and motivated me investigate it further. It would be churlish to thank the authors for anything other than their efforts. Whilst I freely admit that I, on first reading this book got carried away and carried along on the crest of it's wave; I can certainly now say I don't think this book is "groundbreaking" - "mind altering" or any of the other superlatives used to describe it; and if upon reading it, you think it is, you have failed as this poor reviewer had to take from this book what is valuable.

The study history is not static and historians, mainstream or otherwise, are not so magnanimous as to not have vested interests.
History is not like a vein of gold you can follow down a particular seam of rock, you have to go and make sure it's gold - and then you have to go and make sure the guy who told you so is reliable: in short it is an evolving process.
Read this book if you have an interest in history or religion, and then go on and read some others. You take the good where you can find it and you fit it to what you know. Those who forget to arm themselves with a healthy pinch of salt, for those times when it is needed, really deserve all that they get.


A Key Read, 25 Sep 2006
Highly recommended to those interested in Freemasonry, what one must remember is that this is written from the perspective of members of the craft and as such, large parts of their research should be taken seriously.

As with so many books in this genre however, there does appear to be convenient connections between elements of the story. Whatever your opinion of this, it must be said that the links to ancient Egypt are a fascinating eye-opener to the practices of the time and how easily that culture can be related to Western civilisation, for which it would appear that those within the hermetic societies have had an enormous hand in undertaking.

If you are of sceptical or cynical mind related to these kinds of societies, then you should steer clear of this book. But if you are open-minded or have some kind of connection to or interest in Freemasonry, it makes for a fascinating read.

Where is the Bibliography?, 01 Jan 2006
I find this book very good! It uses a lot of knowledge, and makes some new conclusions, that probably should have been made years ago.
BUT I am really missing the bibliography. When I read a book, I like to check the sources or just write down some books to read in the future. But without the bibliography, this is almost impossible. My old history teacher would have failed me if I forgot the bibliography.

But all in all the book is exciting, well-written and it gives you an appetite for more information on the subject,

A classic Opinionated Book, 24 Nov 2005
The book started quite a little informative until it began to do the obvious. Then on it simply related all things it finds to Freemasonry.

And has become freewheeling in conjurating all it gets its hands into to masonry practises and principle, if we can call it that.

It has even not understood what it has perhaps gathered, but most of it has been already written and analysed long time ago.

It is just right that most are really beyond the understanding of such ordinary thinking men. So they just conjure and conjure and conjure and conjure.

At the end it has become nonsense. Luckily the masters of old have done a good job of encoding the real teachings. Now beyond the conjuration of such men as the authors.

Top Read!, 01 Apr 2008
Thoroughly enjoyed this book- I have read a lot of others, but this one doesn't seem to pull any wool over yer eyes, or hide the underlying trend-of-the-time, drugs! It holds credibility as having been written by an ex/ dishonoured Angel, and I admire his guts in doing so, but wouldnt want to be in his shoes right now!
All I can say? informative,Interesting,Seat of the pants and at some stages, quite touching - but it's very hard to completely distance yourself/cut off from humanity entirely, and I feel the Author expresses this in his telling.
Long and short, well worth a look, and with the price, well, if you hate it, then sell it on!
One I will read again.

A WAYWARD ANGEL, 25 Jun 2007
After reading 'The Life And Times Of Sonny Barger' this can be seen as the natural progression to continue the Hells Angel theme, Wethern puts a different twist on the inner workings of the Club and the clubs lust to live life on the edge of society, Motorcycles, drugs, Guns, women, partys, most men dream of and that only a few dedicated and chosen crazy folk can handle. Great reading, LONG LIVE Red and White.


Love this, 11 Jun 2007
I've read most of the Hells Angel true crime books and this one tops the list.

Easy to follow and read, you will find yourself on the back of the motorbike hanging on for dear life as the narrator takes us through life as a HA.

For all you hard-core bikers. This book will not disappoint.



What an eye opener!, 23 Jan 2007
The book starts with a fairly shocking opening which sums up the type of people involved with the Hells Angels at the time the account is set.

It really is fascinating to read first hand about tye types of activities, criminal and otherwise, these men were involved in. The account provides a realistic rather than romanticised view of the Hells Angels. Everything from gun and drug running to the extreme bond of 'brotherhood' and codes of honour they live by. Fascinating and unput-downable!

Interesting, if true..., 26 Oct 2008
I agree with the mixed opinions expressed by other reviewers for this book. Jim Marrs has performed a staggering amount of research to write this, and the first quarter of the book really does open your eyes as to the various groups of people that seem to represent the "highest power". Its interesting how Marrs makes constant links back to the same people (Rockefellers, Rothschilds etc).
Sadly though I found this book a difficult read. Toward the end of the book there are so many people and parties named that I found it confusing. Also, I don't believe the book presents 'the hidden history that connects the Trilateral Commisions, The Freemasons'. It merely states that certain people of considerable power happened to be part of these various organisations, but stops there.
Also, as the book progresses the claims get more and more spectacular, moving onto alien races ruling the Egyptians. We cannot verify the accuracy of all these tales for obvious reasons, so I began to wonder just how elaborate these theories could get before they became rediculous. I would be fantastic to think that aliens really did build the pyramids etc, but its hard to believe with the existing evidence we have based on ancient texts that may not even be interpretted correctly, if indeed genuine to begin with.
I liked this book because it provides strong evidence that there are a select group of individuals who make the world's major decisions and value their wealth and power over human life (creating wars for profit etc). I believe that these people may also hold the answers to other points made in the book about our alien origins. However, its unlikely we will really find out these truths any time soon, so I kind of took the subject matter with a pinch of salt...!

Beyond the Looking Glass, 20 Dec 2007
This book is a phenomenal read. Personally, I don't think everything in it holds water, but this kind of broad-spectrum investigative journalism is a rare thing in todays corporate media. Marrs manages to paint the picture, in broad strokes and in detail when possible, that it is INDEED possible to rule by secrecy. Why would anyone want to decieve the world like that? Look at the history of humanity abd you have your answer. This is after all a planet, were the "leader of the free world" is the grand-son of fascist who participated in a failed coup against Roosevelt ans was later condemned under the Trading with the Enemy Act (yes, Prescott Bush had close ties with Fritz Thyssen).

The wealth and power wielded by these groups will make think revolutionary thoughts.

Enjoy, but read with healthy sceptisism. This book is truly thought provoking.

Makes you wonder..., 10 Feb 2004
This book is incredible. Anyone can fire off accusations of corruption to governments, but Marrs has researched this incredibly thoroughly. I know that sounds incredibly patronising but that's how I see it.

The final chapter details the theory of the 12th planet returning to our solar system, which is explored in his earlier book "Alien Agenda". If you're into conspiracy theories and not afraid to open your mind up to the shocking truth then you should check both of these books out. You'll never be the same again.

Gripping..., 08 Mar 2003
One I started this book, I just couldn't put it down! It details everything for anyone wanting to delve into the world of secret societies and conspiracies, from the kennedy assassination to the crusades. I was thoroughly entertained all the way through, so why did I give this only 4 stars?

Because the last chapter is just plain silly. It details the creation of mankind based on Sumerian myths and legends, and the author presents this as if it happened. This is just one example of how the author only presents one side of the story, and doesn't ever seem to even begin to think or even consider that perhaps some of this might not be true, or that some of the people he quotes might be a bit barmey (David Ike!).

I recommend buying this book, simply because it is so fascinating.

The world is governed by many different personages., 22 May 2002
Pure genius. This book is both interested me from start to finish, but it has also opened my mind to other things that are going on behind the scenes. The history of the Knights Templar, The priory of Sion, and the CFR are all looked at, some in more depth than others. This book is really worth reading, even if it’s just to find out how incestuous the ruling classes and leaders of the old world, and the new world were and are.

A basic Reference book, 24 Nov 2006
An excellent book for both the mason & non-mason. Full of great insights and an overview of the craft

not as good as Fear but still very good, 02 Dec 2007
Not as over the top or as wildly entertaining as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but still very well written and highly entertaining. You don't get bland prose from the Doctor, and does it get any better than phrases such as "young blondes with lobotomy eyes"? This book is about 40 years old, and the reader certainly gets a feel for the 1960s, but I wouldn't at all call it, or Fear and Loathing, dated. The book is anecdotally driven, there are a lot of highly amusing stories with the bikers, and the bikers don't come across to me as completely unlikeable. If you like Fear and Loathing, you'll probably like this book too, although it's not as wacky and wild. Author of Adjust Your Brain: A Practical Theory for Maximizing Mental Health.

Superb, 20 Mar 2007
HST gives a real insight into the biker culture which really took off in the 1960s, and which eventually spilled over to a degree into the UK. It is an intriguing look behind an often closed and misunderstood brotherhood, and HST does not pull his punches. He neither deifies or demonises the people he meets and parties with, he just tells it like it is, and the result is a compelling and very enlightening view of the the Angels.
I would recommend this to anyone who has preconceived ideas about the bikers and their lifestyle, good or bad, as I am sure that it will open your eyes to a sometimes uncomfortable set of truths.

Origins of Gonzo, 24 Feb 2007
I have read most published HST and this is where it all started. This is closer to traditonal reporting than most of the later books but none the worse for it. Hunter is of course the star of the book (as always)but faced with the raw outlaw behaviour of the Angels he appears as the relative straight guy, (which is pretty remarkable if you know Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas). The focus of the book is actually one weekend that HST spent with the Angels and most of the remainder is entertaining analysis of the hysterical "Square" reaction in the press to other events that he did not witness. Throw in an LSD party with Ken Kesey and Allan Ginsberg just before Kesey skipped off to South America and i think you get the picture.

Excellent., 06 May 2005
I thoroughly enjoyed this book - the 'Gonzo' style of journalism, the underlying political references and the overall honesty make this a highly readable book. The time spent with the 'Angels and the trust that develops (on both sides) as a result of this, gives you a unique insight into both the Author's and the Subject's way of life. Interesting to see the 'Press / Authority as Antagonist' angle too.

H.S. Thompson., 07 Mar 2005
it was some bad crazziness, but Hunter.s. Thompson Hell's Angels happens to be one of the finest books i believe i have read. Although it does not have the harsh, riped and savage dissection of human morals that Fear and Loathing in las Vegas has and is, Thompson provides a fine exapmple of his own genre of Gonzo. the unique perseptive of American culture and the realities of a drug fueled and boozed up segment of a society to which they where an affront provided moments of great enterttianment. (The drug diet of one angel and his subsiquent consomption had me crippled.) Any way i believe it neccessary for any one who loves Thompson, or even Hemmingway or Burgess to read Hell's Angels and every other Thompson publication.

Surprisingly boring, 30 Nov 2002
In this book Hunter presents the Hell's Angels in a more postive light at a time when the rest of the US media were portraying the Angels as the most evil people on the planet. However, this is a pretty dull book, with all sorts of terribly boring sections on the history of motorbikes and the rituals of the different Hell's Angels gangs. Because the book follows a more conventional journalistic style it lacks the vitality and passion of Hunter's later works.

A book that actually put the Angels in a "good light", 30 Jan 2002
This is certainly an interesting read and who better to cast his eye over the last outlaw group of the 20th century than one of the original outlaw journalists. This is a very entertaining read and I would reccomend this to anybody who lives any kind of "alternative" lifestyle. However once you have read this you must read Hells Angel by Sonny Barger who is mentioned throughout this book and reading his book you notice that Thompson's book is not quite as good as it first seems so read it before you read Sonny's. Enjoy

Hunter's got balls, 11 Jul 2001
Hunter S. Thompson goes where no other journalists dare. A great read if you're interested in the Hell's Angels. I loved it.

Hanging with the home boys - Angel style, 21 Aug 2000
An in depth look at the life and times of the Oakland Angels. From their roots, through to the end...the end for Thompson that is. HST rides with the baddest, ever aware that things could turn ugly at any moment. Ever aware that the Angels could turn on him if they ever got the notion that he was exploiting them. Until, in the end, they do and Thompson gets a proper stomping.

Something of a halfway house, 25 Jul 2000
A decent enough read, but not one of his better books. I think the big problem with this is the format: if he doesn't have a deadline he seems to find it difficult to generate any kind of pace or impetus and the end result is pithy and fragmented. The first few chapters are remarkably 'straight' accounts of life with the Angels, followed by a looser style that still retains a strong reportage feel to it. He finishes with some absolute gems: classic Thompson, letting rip on the Angels. this is a transitional book, and you can see where he's trying new things out, but it doesn't always come off, and lacks the energy of his later political stuff.

Old hat, 30 May 2007
This book was first published 11 years ago but most of the content has been debunked by recent academic research most recently by the Curator of the Masonic museum of Scotland (i forget the actual name but no doubt you can Goggle it) who really does show that this decade old stuff is more or less rubbish. By all means buy this book to understand what The Rosslyn Hoax? debunks otherwise it is a waste of money.

"It's stories I'm telling you", 28 Sep 2006
Like one of the previous reviewers I have come to realise that this book has it's pitfalls. Poorly squared conclusions, leaps of imagination and to an extent an agenda that drives the narrative. But to those who attack it's content with all the vigour of the inquisition I would say this, "what are you so scared of?"

It is obvious to the discerning reader, as one reviewer states, that this book is not the first or the final word on the subject matter discussed, and as such it should be taken for what it is instead of being taken as THE definative explanation. So what is this book about.

This is a book about the journey two pretty normal, pretty well educated guys took when they decided to investigate the history of Freemasonry. What transpired, to them, was a meandering, tangled web route through the history of not just Freemasonry but also it's roots, the crusades, the Egyptian dynasties, the church and the historical figure most people in the west associate with the name Jesus Christ and much more to boot. I won't spend time pointlessly trying to de-bunk or bolster their claims, although it must be noted that the authors have revised their opinions regarding much they uncovered since publication.

What I got from this book was an awareness that what I believed about accepted history could be, in fact, wrong. Also it gave me a greater understanding about what history is and motivated me investigate it further. It would be churlish to thank the authors for anything other than their efforts. Whilst I freely admit that I, on first reading this book got carried away and carried along on the crest of it's wave; I can certainly now say I don't think this book is "groundbreaking" - "mind altering" or any of the other superlatives used to describe it; and if upon reading it, you think it is, you have failed as this poor reviewer had to take from this book what is valuable.

The study history is not static and historians, mainstream or otherwise, are not so magnanimous as to not have vested interests.
History is not like a vein of gold you can follow down a particular seam of rock, you have to go and make sure it's gold - and then you have to go and make sure the guy who told you so is reliable: in short it is an evolving process.
Read this book if you have an interest in history or religion, and then go on and read some others. You take the good where you can find it and you fit it to what you know. Those who forget to arm themselves with a healthy pinch of salt, for those times when it is needed, really deserve all that they get.


A Key Read, 25 Sep 2006
Highly recommended to those interested in Freemasonry, what one must remember is that this is written from the perspective of members of the craft and as such, large parts of their research should be taken seriously.

As with so many books in this genre however, there does appear to be convenient connections between elements of the story. Whatever your opinion of this, it must be said that the links to ancient Egypt are a fascinating eye-opener to the practices of the time and how easily that culture can be related to Western civilisation, for which it would appear that those within the hermetic societies have had an enormous hand in undertaking.

If you are of sceptical or cynical mind related to these kinds of societies, then you should steer clear of this book. But if you are open-minded or have some kind of connection to or interest in Freemasonry, it makes for a fascinating read.

Where is the Bibliography?, 01 Jan 2006
I find this book very good! It uses a lot of knowledge, and makes some new conclusions, that probably should have been made years ago.
BUT I am really missing the bibliography. When I read a book, I like to check the sources or just write down some books to read in the future. But without the bibliography, this is almost impossible. My old history teacher would have failed me if I forgot the bibliography.

But all in all the book is exciting, well-written and it gives you an appetite for more information on the subject,

A classic Opinionated Book, 24 Nov 2005
The book started quite a little informative until it began to do the obvious. Then on it simply related all things it finds to Freemasonry.

And has become freewheeling in conjurating all it gets its hands into to masonry practises and principle, if we can call it that.

It has even not understood what it has perhaps gathered, but most of it has been already written and analysed long time ago.

It is just right that most are really beyond the understanding of such ordinary thinking men. So they just conjure and conjure and conjure and conjure.

At the end it has become nonsense. Luckily the masters of old have done a good job of encoding the real teachings. Now beyond the conjuration of such men as the authors.

Top Read!, 01 Apr 2008
Thoroughly enjoyed this book- I have read a lot of others, but this one doesn't seem to pull any wool over yer eyes, or hide the underlying trend-of-the-time, drugs! It holds credibility as having been written by an ex/ dishonoured Angel, and I admire his guts in doing so, but wouldnt want to be in his shoes right now!
All I can say? informative,Interesting,Seat of the pants and at some stages, quite touching - but it's very hard to completely distance yourself/cut off from humanity entirely, and I feel the Author expresses this in his telling.
Long and short, well worth a look, and with the price, well, if you hate it, then sell it on!
One I will read again.

A WAYWARD ANGEL, 25 Jun 2007
After reading 'The Life And Times Of Sonny Barger' this can be seen as the natural progression to continue the Hells Angel theme, Wethern puts a different twist on the inner workings of the Club and the clubs lust to live life on the edge of society, Motorcycles, drugs, Guns, women, partys, most men dream of and that only a few dedicated and chosen crazy folk can handle. Great reading, LONG LIVE Red and White.


Love this, 11 Jun 2007
I've read most of the Hells Angel true crime books and this one tops the list.

Easy to follow and read, you will find yourself on the back of the motorbike hanging on for dear life as the narrator takes us through life as a HA.

For all you hard-core bikers. This book will not disappoint.



What an eye opener!, 23 Jan 2007
The book starts with a fairly shocking opening which sums up the type of people involved with the Hells Angels at the time the account is set.

It really is fascinating to read first hand about tye types of activities, criminal and otherwise, these men were involved in. The account provides a realistic rather than romanticised view of the Hells Angels. Everything from gun and drug running to the extreme bond of 'brotherhood' and codes of honour they live by. Fascinating and unput-downable!

Interesting, if true..., 26 Oct 2008
I agree with the mixed opinions expressed by other reviewers for this book. Jim Marrs has performed a staggering amount of research to write this, and the first quarter of the book really does open your eyes as to the various groups of people that seem to represent the "highest power". Its interesting how Marrs makes constant links back to the same people (Rockefellers, Rothschilds etc).
Sadly though I found this book a difficult read. Toward the end of the book there are so many people and parties named that I found it confusing. Also, I don't believe the book presents 'the hidden history that connects the Trilateral Commisions, The Freemasons'. It merely states that certain people of considerable power happened to be part of these various organisations, but stops there.
Also, as the book progresses the claims get more and more spectacular, moving onto alien races ruling the Egyptians. We cannot verify the accuracy of all these tales for obvious reasons, so I began to wonder just how elaborate these theories could get before they became rediculous. I would be fantastic to think that aliens really did build the pyramids etc, but its hard to believe with the existing evidence we have based on ancient texts that may not even be interpretted correctly, if indeed genuine to begin with.
I liked this book because it provides strong evidence that there are a select group of individuals who make the world's major decisions and value their wealth and power over human life (creating wars for profit etc). I believe that these people may also hold the answers to other points made in the book about our alien origins. However, its unlikely we will really find out these truths any time soon, so I kind of took the subject matter with a pinch of salt...!

Beyond the Looking Glass, 20 Dec 2007
This book is a phenomenal read. Personally, I don't think everything in it holds water, but this kind of broad-spectrum investigative journalism is a rare thing in todays corporate media. Marrs manages to paint the picture, in broad strokes and in detail when possible, that it is INDEED possible to rule by secrecy. Why would anyone want to decieve the world like that? Look at the history of humanity abd you have your answer. This is after all a planet, were the "leader of the free world" is the grand-son of fascist who participated in a failed coup against Roosevelt ans was later condemned under the Trading with the Enemy Act (yes, Prescott Bush had close ties with Fritz Thyssen).

The wealth and power wielded by these groups will make think revolutionary thoughts.

Enjoy, but read with healthy sceptisism. This book is truly thought provoking.

Makes you wonder..., 10 Feb 2004
This book is incredible. Anyone can fire off accusations of corruption to governments, but Marrs has researched this incredibly thoroughly. I know that sounds incredibly patronising but that's how I see it.

The final chapter details the theory of the 12th planet returning to our solar system, which is explored in his earlier book "Alien Agenda". If you're into conspiracy theories and not afraid to open your mind up to the shocking truth then you should check both of these books out. You'll never be the same again.

Gripping..., 08 Mar 2003
One I started this book, I just couldn't put it down! It details everything for anyone wanting to delve into the world of secret societies and conspiracies, from the kennedy assassination to the crusades. I was thoroughly entertained all the way through, so why did I give this only 4 stars?

Because the last chapter is just plain silly. It details the creation of mankind based on Sumerian myths and legends, and the author presents this as if it happened. This is just one example of how the author only presents one side of the story, and doesn't ever seem to even begin to think or even consider that perhaps some of this might not be true, or that some of the people he quotes might be a bit barmey (David Ike!).

I recommend buying this book, simply because it is so fascinating.

The world is governed by many different personages., 22 May 2002
Pure genius. This book is both interested me from start to finish, but it has also opened my mind to other things that are going on behind the scenes. The history of the Knights Templar, The priory of Sion, and the CFR are all looked at, some in more depth than others. This book is really worth reading, even if it’s just to find out how incestuous the ruling classes and leaders of the old world, and the new world were and are.

A basic Reference book, 24 Nov 2006
An excellent book for both the mason & non-mason. Full of great insights and an overview of the craft

The Best of the Templars, 27 Sep 2008
Michael Haag's The Templars: History & Myth, is the best book I have read on the history of the Knights Templar. Written for the non-academic reader, it nevertheless is a comprehensive, scholarly approach to a fascinating subject. Anyone who subscribes to some of the modern myths and pseudo histories involving the order should read this book.

not as good as Fear but still very good, 02 Dec 2007
Not as over the top or as wildly entertaining as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, but still very well written and highly entertaining. You don't get bland prose from the Doctor, and does it get any better than phrases such as "young blondes with lobotomy eyes"? This book is about 40 years old, and the reader certainly gets a feel for the 1960s, but I wouldn't at all call it, or Fear and Loathing, dated. The book is anecdotally driven, there are a lot of highly amusing stories with the bikers, and the bikers don't come across to me as completely unlikeable. If you like Fear and Loathing, you'll probably like this book too, although it's not as wacky and wild. Author of Adjust Your Brain: A Practical Theory for Maximizing Mental Health.

Superb, 20 Mar 2007
HST gives a real insight into the biker culture which really took off in the 1960s, and which eventually spilled over to a degree into the UK. It is an intriguing look behind an often closed and misunderstood brotherhood, and HST does not pull his punches. He neither deifies or demonises the people he meets and parties with, he just tells it like it is, and the result is a compelling and very enlightening view of the the Angels.
I would recommend this to anyone who has preconceived ideas about the bikers and their lifestyle, good or bad, as I am sure that it will open your eyes to a sometimes uncomfortable set of truths.

Origins of Gonzo, 24 Feb 2007
I have read most published HST and this is where it all started. This is closer to traditonal reporting than most of the later books but none the worse for it. Hunter is of course the star of the book (as always)but faced with the raw outlaw behaviour of the Angels he appears as the relative straight guy, (which is pretty remarkable if you know Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas). The focus of the book is actually one weekend that HST spent with the Angels and most of the remainder is entertaining analysis of the hysterical "Square" reaction in the press to other events that he did not witness. Throw in an LSD party with Ken Kesey and Allan Ginsberg just before Kesey skipped off to South America and i think you get the picture.

Excellent., 06 May 2005
I thoroughly enjoyed this book - the 'Gonzo' style of journalism, the underlying political references and the overall honesty make this a highly readable book. The time spent with the 'Angels and the trust that develops (on both sides) as a result of this, gives you a unique insight into both the Author's and the Subject's way of life. Interesting to see the 'Press / Authority as Antagonist' angle too.

H.S. Thompson., 07 Mar 2005
it was some bad crazziness, but Hunter.s. Thompson Hell's Angels happens to be one of the finest books i believe i have read. Although it does not have the harsh, riped and savage dissection of human morals that Fear and Loathing in las Vegas has and is, Thompson provides a fine exapmple of his own genre of Gonzo. the unique perseptive of American culture and the realities of a drug fueled and boozed up segment of a society to which they where an affront provided moments of great enterttianment. (The drug diet of one angel and his subsiquent consomption had me crippled.) Any way i believe it neccessary for any one who loves Thompson, or even Hemmingway or Burgess to read Hell's Angels and every other Thompson publication.

Surprisingly boring, 30 Nov 2002
In this book Hunter presents the Hell's Angels in a more postive l