Informative and easy to read, 14 Nov 2000
Full of handy little practical tips from an experienced insider's point-of view but without the usual pretentious bull**** you tend to find in these books. Very easy reading, clear and concise. Am much the wiser for reading it.

This is a must have for any and all independent filmmakers!!, 31 Aug 1999
I found the book to be perfect in describing how to set up an independent film company. The Sample Business Plan for a Fictional Company (in the Appendix) is written in plain english which made it easy to see how one could put together their own thorough business plan. I definetely enjoyed the book and am working on my business plan for my independent film company as I type this.

Informative and easy to read, 14 Nov 2000
Full of handy little practical tips from an experienced insider's point-of view but without the usual pretentious bull**** you tend to find in these books. Very easy reading, clear and concise. Am much the wiser for reading it.

This is a must have for any and all independent filmmakers!!, 31 Aug 1999
I found the book to be perfect in describing how to set up an independent film company. The Sample Business Plan for a Fictional Company (in the Appendix) is written in plain english which made it easy to see how one could put together their own thorough business plan. I definetely enjoyed the book and am working on my business plan for my independent film company as I type this.

Interesting, but badly written., 16 Oct 2007
As a source of tips and guidance on photo journalism and the art of photography whilst working on location and when dealing with news or documentary subjects this book is quite useful. It is however the most badly written book I have ever read. The standard of English, grammar, and the way the subject matter is developed and discussed is simply quite appalling. As this book is published under the auspices of the Associated Press this is unacceptable. Furthermore the publishers (McGraw Hill) should have appointed an editor to check the text and make the necessary corrections before the book was published. If an editor was appointed prior to publication then he or she along with the author need to re-examine their writing ability.

I don't claim to be an expert at grammar or on writing books, nor am I claiming that anything I write is grammatically accurate, but I do try to be accurate and I have enough grasp of my own language to know when I'm reading something badly put together. I have struggled to get through this book. The writing is so bad that even by half way through the first chapter I was ready to throw the book in the bin. However, I have persevered and now that I have finished the book and underlined short passages and quotes I felt were relevant and to-the-point I now have a useful source of advice, tips and guidance on the subject of photojournalism. I can refer to the book whenever I need to and go straight to sections I have underlined.

The book itself is rather odd. The glossy cover is well designed and printed but when you open the book what you see inside is incongruous with the cover: the paper for the pages is low grade and the text is printed in an oddly large font size. The book is divided into chapters, but within each chapter there is no further division of the chapter's subject into sub-topics. The text winds its way from one sub-topic to another without any paragraph headings or titles to let the reader know the topics are changing. At various points in the book you'll be reading about a topic one minute and a completely new sub-topic in the next paragraph without any kind of break or segue.

I know many people would say there is a growing difference in the style of writing between Americans and Brits - and I know that some British writing (especially in the tabloid papers) is of a decreasing standard, however the standard of writing by the author falls woefully short of what it should be for a book on journalism (albeit photojournalism), and is quite simply riddled with eye-watering incorrect usage and frustrating grammatical gaffs. I ask the author to please check for the correct use of the comma. There are commas littered throughout this book and all too often in completely the wrong place.

I don't like to be negative but I felt I would be a phoney if I didn't say in this review what I genuinely thought so that potential buyers of the book know what they're getting. There is some great advice to be gleaned from this book, and some useful tips for developing one's own photojournalistic style and ability. But it is a chore getting to the tips and advice, and in a book carrying the name of a venerable journalism association and intended for use by students of journalism and photojournalism this should not be the case.

Informative and easy to read, 14 Nov 2000
Full of handy little practical tips from an experienced insider's point-of view but without the usual pretentious bull**** you tend to find in these books. Very easy reading, clear and concise. Am much the wiser for reading it.

This is a must have for any and all independent filmmakers!!, 31 Aug 1999
I found the book to be perfect in describing how to set up an independent film company. The Sample Business Plan for a Fictional Company (in the Appendix) is written in plain english which made it easy to see how one could put together their own thorough business plan. I definetely enjoyed the book and am working on my business plan for my independent film company as I type this.

Interesting, but badly written., 16 Oct 2007
As a source of tips and guidance on photo journalism and the art of photography whilst working on location and when dealing with news or documentary subjects this book is quite useful. It is however the most badly written book I have ever read. The standard of English, grammar, and the way the subject matter is developed and discussed is simply quite appalling. As this book is published under the auspices of the Associated Press this is unacceptable. Furthermore the publishers (McGraw Hill) should have appointed an editor to check the text and make the necessary corrections before the book was published. If an editor was appointed prior to publication then he or she along with the author need to re-examine their writing ability.

I don't claim to be an expert at grammar or on writing books, nor am I claiming that anything I write is grammatically accurate, but I do try to be accurate and I have enough grasp of my own language to know when I'm reading something badly put together. I have struggled to get through this book. The writing is so bad that even by half way through the first chapter I was ready to throw the book in the bin. However, I have persevered and now that I have finished the book and underlined short passages and quotes I felt were relevant and to-the-point I now have a useful source of advice, tips and guidance on the subject of photojournalism. I can refer to the book whenever I need to and go straight to sections I have underlined.

The book itself is rather odd. The glossy cover is well designed and printed but when you open the book what you see inside is incongruous with the cover: the paper for the pages is low grade and the text is printed in an oddly large font size. The book is divided into chapters, but within each chapter there is no further division of the chapter's subject into sub-topics. The text winds its way from one sub-topic to another without any paragraph headings or titles to let the reader know the topics are changing. At various points in the book you'll be reading about a topic one minute and a completely new sub-topic in the next paragraph without any kind of break or segue.

I know many people would say there is a growing difference in the style of writing between Americans and Brits - and I know that some British writing (especially in the tabloid papers) is of a decreasing standard, however the standard of writing by the author falls woefully short of what it should be for a book on journalism (albeit photojournalism), and is quite simply riddled with eye-watering incorrect usage and frustrating grammatical gaffs. I ask the author to please check for the correct use of the comma. There are commas littered throughout this book and all too often in completely the wrong place.

I don't like to be negative but I felt I would be a phoney if I didn't say in this review what I genuinely thought so that potential buyers of the book know what they're getting. There is some great advice to be gleaned from this book, and some useful tips for developing one's own photojournalistic style and ability. But it is a chore getting to the tips and advice, and in a book carrying the name of a venerable journalism association and intended for use by students of journalism and photojournalism this should not be the case.

Worth it for that one new tip, 12 Jul 2007
A rather slight, if endearingly eccentric book which sometimes seems to say more about the love of dogs than books. Rather USA centred, as you might expect, with the sections on further reading and supplies having only limited usefulness on this side of the pond. The section on repairs is rendered close to useless by the want of a few simple diagrams, but I, a part-time professional bookseller, still found one or two worthwhile tips, particularly. . . but no, you'll have to read it. Suffice it to say that I may have turned a £60 book into a £125 one, if it works!

Informative and easy to read, 14 Nov 2000
Full of handy little practical tips from an experienced insider's point-of view but without the usual pretentious bull**** you tend to find in these books. Very easy reading, clear and concise. Am much the wiser for reading it.

This is a must have for any and all independent filmmakers!!, 31 Aug 1999
I found the book to be perfect in describing how to set up an independent film company. The Sample Business Plan for a Fictional Company (in the Appendix) is written in plain english which made it easy to see how one could put together their own thorough business plan. I definetely enjoyed the book and am working on my business plan for my independent film company as I type this.

Interesting, but badly written., 16 Oct 2007
As a source of tips and guidance on photo journalism and the art of photography whilst working on location and when dealing with news or documentary subjects this book is quite useful. It is however the most badly written book I have ever read. The standard of English, grammar, and the way the subject matter is developed and discussed is simply quite appalling. As this book is published under the auspices of the Associated Press this is unacceptable. Furthermore the publishers (McGraw Hill) should have appointed an editor to check the text and make the necessary corrections before the book was published. If an editor was appointed prior to publication then he or she along with the author need to re-examine their writing ability.

I don't claim to be an expert at grammar or on writing books, nor am I claiming that anything I write is grammatically accurate, but I do try to be accurate and I have enough grasp of my own language to know when I'm reading something badly put together. I have struggled to get through this book. The writing is so bad that even by half way through the first chapter I was ready to throw the book in the bin. However, I have persevered and now that I have finished the book and underlined short passages and quotes I felt were relevant and to-the-point I now have a useful source of advice, tips and guidance on the subject of photojournalism. I can refer to the book whenever I need to and go straight to sections I have underlined.

The book itself is rather odd. The glossy cover is well designed and printed but when you open the book what you see inside is incongruous with the cover: the paper for the pages is low grade and the text is printed in an oddly large font size. The book is divided into chapters, but within each chapter there is no further division of the chapter's subject into sub-topics. The text winds its way from one sub-topic to another without any paragraph headings or titles to let the reader know the topics are changing. At various points in the book you'll be reading about a topic one minute and a completely new sub-topic in the next paragraph without any kind of break or segue.

I know many people would say there is a growing difference in the style of writing between Americans and Brits - and I know that some British writing (especially in the tabloid papers) is of a decreasing standard, however the standard of writing by the author falls woefully short of what it should be for a book on journalism (albeit photojournalism), and is quite simply riddled with eye-watering incorrect usage and frustrating grammatical gaffs. I ask the author to please check for the correct use of the comma. There are commas littered throughout this book and all too often in completely the wrong place.

I don't like to be negative but I felt I would be a phoney if I didn't say in this review what I genuinely thought so that potential buyers of the book know what they're getting. There is some great advice to be gleaned from this book, and some useful tips for developing one's own photojournalistic style and ability. But it is a chore getting to the tips and advice, and in a book carrying the name of a venerable journalism association and intended for use by students of journalism and photojournalism this should not be the case.

Worth it for that one new tip, 12 Jul 2007
A rather slight, if endearingly eccentric book which sometimes seems to say more about the love of dogs than books. Rather USA centred, as you might expect, with the sections on further reading and supplies having only limited usefulness on this side of the pond. The section on repairs is rendered close to useless by the want of a few simple diagrams, but I, a part-time professional bookseller, still found one or two worthwhile tips, particularly. . . but no, you'll have to read it. Suffice it to say that I may have turned a £60 book into a £125 one, if it works!

Essential reading for any existing or budding Programme Manager, 06 Mar 2008
Managing Successful Programmes describes the OGC's (the Office of Government Commerce) approach to managing change and delivering business benefits. As a Senior Programme Manager this book provided me with all of the information and knowledge that I needed to sell my services to my clients whether public or private sector.

Unlike PRINCE2 it is succinct surprisingly free of jargon and rather than focusing on the detail gives an overview of key areas leaving the day to day application at your discretion.

The chapters on benefits and stakeholder management are particularly useful with examples of powerful methods that can be used in the real world to identify and analyze stakeholders.

In all a clear well structured book ideal for any involved in Programme Management.


A good theory manual for students, lacking in practical apps, 10 Feb 2001
This title provides a good overview of step by step theoretical models for Programme Management, however it lacks the true in depth information required for practical application.

A good buy for under graduates looking to grow their knowledge in this complex arena, or for new programme managers looking for a reference manual.

Informative and easy to read, 14 Nov 2000
Full of handy little practical tips from an experienced insider's point-of view but without the usual pretentious bull**** you tend to find in these books. Very easy reading, clear and concise. Am much the wiser for reading it.

This is a must have for any and all independent filmmakers!!, 31 Aug 1999
I found the book to be perfect in describing how to set up an independent film company. The Sample Business Plan for a Fictional Company (in the Appendix) is written in plain english which made it easy to see how one could put together their own thorough business plan. I definetely enjoyed the book and am working on my business plan for my independent film company as I type this.

Interesting, but badly written., 16 Oct 2007
As a source of tips and guidance on photo journalism and the art of photography whilst working on location and when dealing with news or documentary subjects this book is quite useful. It is however the most badly written book I have ever read. The standard of English, grammar, and the way the subject matter is developed and discussed is simply quite appalling. As this book is published under the auspices of the Associated Press this is unacceptable. Furthermore the publishers (McGraw Hill) should have appointed an editor to check the text and make the necessary corrections before the book was published. If an editor was appointed prior to publication then he or she along with the author need to re-examine their writing ability.

I don't claim to be an expert at grammar or on writing books, nor am I claiming that anything I write is grammatically accurate, but I do try to be accurate and I have enough grasp of my own language to know when I'm reading something badly put together. I have struggled to get through this book. The writing is so bad that even by half way through the first chapter I was ready to throw the book in the bin. However, I have persevered and now that I have finished the book and underlined short passages and quotes I felt were relevant and to-the-point I now have a useful source of advice, tips and guidance on the subject of photojournalism. I can refer to the book whenever I need to and go straight to sections I have underlined.

The book itself is rather odd. The glossy cover is well designed and printed but when you open the book what you see inside is incongruous with the cover: the paper for the pages is low grade and the text is printed in an oddly large font size. The book is divided into chapters, but within each chapter there is no further division of the chapter's subject into sub-topics. The text winds its way from one sub-topic to another without any paragraph headings or titles to let the reader know the topics are changing. At various points in the book you'll be reading about a topic one minute and a completely new sub-topic in the next paragraph without any kind of break or segue.

I know many people would say there is a growing difference in the style of writing between Americans and Brits - and I know that some British writing (especially in the tabloid papers) is of a decreasing standard, however the standard of writing by the author falls woefully short of what it should be for a book on journalism (albeit photojournalism), and is quite simply riddled with eye-watering incorrect usage and frustrating grammatical gaffs. I ask the author to please check for the correct use of the comma. There are commas littered throughout this book and all too often in completely the wrong place.

I don't like to be negative but I felt I would be a phoney if I didn't say in this review what I genuinely thought so that potential buyers of the book know what they're getting. There is some great advice to be gleaned from this book, and some useful tips for developing one's own photojournalistic style and ability. But it is a chore getting to the tips and advice, and in a book carrying the name of a venerable journalism association and intended for use by students of journalism and photojournalism this should not be the case.

Worth it for that one new tip, 12 Jul 2007
A rather slight, if endearingly eccentric book which sometimes seems to say more about the love of dogs than books. Rather USA centred, as you might expect, with the sections on further reading and supplies having only limited usefulness on this side of the pond. The section on repairs is rendered close to useless by the want of a few simple diagrams, but I, a part-time professional bookseller, still found one or two worthwhile tips, particularly. . . but no, you'll have to read it. Suffice it to say that I may have turned a £60 book into a £125 one, if it works!

Essential reading for any existing or budding Programme Manager, 06 Mar 2008
Managing Successful Programmes describes the OGC's (the Office of Government Commerce) approach to managing change and delivering business benefits. As a Senior Programme Manager this book provided me with all of the information and knowledge that I needed to sell my services to my clients whether public or private sector.

Unlike PRINCE2 it is succinct surprisingly free of jargon and rather than focusing on the detail gives an overview of key areas leaving the day to day application at your discretion.

The chapters on benefits and stakeholder management are particularly useful with examples of powerful methods that can be used in the real world to identify and analyze stakeholders.

In all a clear well structured book ideal for any involved in Programme Management.


A good theory manual for students, lacking in practical apps, 10 Feb 2001
This title provides a good overview of step by step theoretical models for Programme Management, however it lacks the true in depth information required for practical application.

A good buy for under graduates looking to grow their knowledge in this complex arena, or for new programme managers looking for a reference manual.

Clear Overview, 31 Oct 2004
Hunter's book contains a clear, plain English overview of the subject of classification. I would recommend it to anyone new to the subject or someone who has tried without success to wade through some of the more comprehensive, but frequently turgid, textbooks on the subject. The second edition has slightly changed, and enhanced the style, the material is updated and there is a new (brief) chapter on classification and the internet. Contains useful references and urls.

Comprehensive, but dull, 12 Oct 2000
Hunter covers all types of classification, uses plenty of examples, but still fails to grab the attention of the reader. The chapters are clearly defined but there is little emphasis on creativity or flexible thinking to develop new or 100% appropriate classification solutions - this book will only tell you what already exists and that you may have to apply several different methods of classifying to make sure you meet all the requirements.

However, it does stress that whatever classification method you choose it should be easy for the person who has to use it.