Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest of Jerusalum and the origins of the crusade. Scholarly, Epic and thoroughly engrossing. The author had a very engaging style. Recommended.

Best books, 14 Feb 2007
of the plethora of books i have read in all subjects, i have the best memories of these. Especially the first 2 books because they are not only vividly factual but also very flowing. there is strong character development and feels like Lord of the Rings meets the Kingdom of Heaven.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest of Jerusalum and the origins of the crusade. Scholarly, Epic and thoroughly engrossing. The author had a very engaging style. Recommended.

Best books, 14 Feb 2007
of the plethora of books i have read in all subjects, i have the best memories of these. Especially the first 2 books because they are not only vividly factual but also very flowing. there is strong character development and feels like Lord of the Rings meets the Kingdom of Heaven.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest of Jerusalum and the origins of the crusade. Scholarly, Epic and thoroughly engrossing. The author had a very engaging style. Recommended.

Best books, 14 Feb 2007
of the plethora of books i have read in all subjects, i have the best memories of these. Especially the first 2 books because they are not only vividly factual but also very flowing. there is strong character development and feels like Lord of the Rings meets the Kingdom of Heaven.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest of Jerusalum and the origins of the crusade. Scholarly, Epic and thoroughly engrossing. The author had a very engaging style. Recommended.

Best books, 14 Feb 2007
of the plethora of books i have read in all subjects, i have the best memories of these. Especially the first 2 books because they are not only vividly factual but also very flowing. there is strong character development and feels like Lord of the Rings meets the Kingdom of Heaven.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest of Jerusalum and the origins of the crusade. Scholarly, Epic and thoroughly engrossing. The author had a very engaging style. Recommended.

Best books, 14 Feb 2007
of the plethora of books i have read in all subjects, i have the best memories of these. Especially the first 2 books because they are not only vividly factual but also very flowing. there is strong character development and feels like Lord of the Rings meets the Kingdom of Heaven.

The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth., 19 May 2005
Mr Reston has done a great job in researching and preparing for this book. His fiction is largely based on fact and his characters, though mostly silent, are as vivid and alive as any other novel. I am not an avid reader, not to mention that I studied the history of the crusades, but eventhough I knew where the story-line is leading to, I couldn't resist reading the book. It took me a weekend and a couple of hours after work to finish.

Not recommended, 11 Oct 2004
Warriors of God is a novelistic treatment of the third crusade that is fairly readable, but does not stand up as a work of history. It is pacily written, but the author uses considerable artistic licence.

The fundamental problems lie first in the impression that the author has not really grasped the medieval period, something evident particularly in the early chapters, where there are some sweeping statements with no factual basis, and gross and inaccurate over-simplifications. Reston's use of modern terminology is more often misleading rather than illuminating. (In this respect, the book suffers badly in comparison with something like Rubicon, where Tom Holland did a much better job of conveying the essential strangeness of his period to a modern reader, while drawing parallels with today more subtly.) More serious is a failure to adequately explain the concept and attraction of crusading itself, something central to understanding the period.

The second key flaw is the author's determination to present a revisionist view of the period, with the Christians firmly established as the bad guys. The Christians were doubtless responsible for some terrible atrocities, but there is no real effort to explain why this happened or put it in the context of the time. The author presents the crusades as a perversion of the defensive concept of 'holy war', without any reference to the preceding centuries of rapid Islamic expansion. The line is at least set out clear in the introduction, where the crusades are described as 'a frenzy of hate and violence unprecedented before the advent of the technological age and the scourge of Hitler'.

I had high hopes for this, as I have studied the crusades and think it is good to bring history to a wider audience, but I was very disappointed. A wasted opportunity.

Brilliant and entertaining, 06 Feb 2002
Although I fully agree with the 5 star-rating already given, I think this book also deserves an enthousiastic endorsement. After having in an earlier book uncovered a largely ignored period in European history (the highly informative and entertaining The Last Apocalypse, also available through Amazon), James Reston takes us now on the much more familiar path of the Crusades. He paints a vivid and colourful portrait of the third crusade's main characters, Richard the Lionheart, Saladin and Philip Augustus of France and gives us a refreshingly unbiased history of that expedition.
Mr. Preston has the narrative talent, the mischievous eye for less-than-elevated motives and telling anecdote that will make you want to read this book in one go. The fact that Richard and Philip were em, interacting homosexuals - the first the moustache and leather cap-wearing kind, the second more the bitchy hairdresser - is maybe mentioned a tad too often, but most other descriptions and background stories give a wonderful and highly readable insight in not only the third crusade, but also in the political situation and personal development of the main characters that propelled them to the center stage. You won't regret buying this book.

A book that should be read with the conflict in the M.E, 09 Jan 2002
For a start this book does not choose sides, so both muslims and chritians can read it. The book may be boring for those who do not like history but there is quiet alot of maps to show you what is going on and which may interest you. The only problem is that there are quotes which there is no information were they came from. Except that the book gives you an idea of the war that was really against two civilisations and which looks like a present conflict.

its a must buy..

A superb book, 26 Nov 2001
Reading this book has you believing that the crusade happened yesterday and that you are reading a news report. whereas most books on this subject take one side or the other this book is completely balanced in its argument. it has interviews with people at the time and a detailed account of events. although this is a fictional biography based on key historical events it makes the book all the more exciting to read and i recommend this book to anyone.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest of Jerusalum and the origins of the crusade. Scholarly, Epic and thoroughly engrossing. The author had a very engaging style. Recommended.

Best books, 14 Feb 2007
of the plethora of books i have read in all subjects, i have the best memories of these. Especially the first 2 books because they are not only vividly factual but also very flowing. there is strong character development and feels like Lord of the Rings meets the Kingdom of Heaven.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest of Jerusalum and the origins of the crusade. Scholarly, Epic and thoroughly engrossing. The author had a very engaging style. Recommended.

Best books, 14 Feb 2007
of the plethora of books i have read in all subjects, i have the best memories of these. Especially the first 2 books because they are not only vividly factual but also very flowing. there is strong character development and feels like Lord of the Rings meets the Kingdom of Heaven.

The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth., 19 May 2005
Mr Reston has done a great job in researching and preparing for this book. His fiction is largely based on fact and his characters, though mostly silent, are as vivid and alive as any other novel. I am not an avid reader, not to mention that I studied the history of the crusades, but eventhough I knew where the story-line is leading to, I couldn't resist reading the book. It took me a weekend and a couple of hours after work to finish.

Not recommended, 11 Oct 2004
Warriors of God is a novelistic treatment of the third crusade that is fairly readable, but does not stand up as a work of history. It is pacily written, but the author uses considerable artistic licence.

The fundamental problems lie first in the impression that the author has not really grasped the medieval period, something evident particularly in the early chapters, where there are some sweeping statements with no factual basis, and gross and inaccurate over-simplifications. Reston's use of modern terminology is more often misleading rather than illuminating. (In this respect, the book suffers badly in comparison with something like Rubicon, where Tom Holland did a much better job of conveying the essential strangeness of his period to a modern reader, while drawing parallels with today more subtly.) More serious is a failure to adequately explain the concept and attraction of crusading itself, something central to understanding the period.

The second key flaw is the author's determination to present a revisionist view of the period, with the Christians firmly established as the bad guys. The Christians were doubtless responsible for some terrible atrocities, but there is no real effort to explain why this happened or put it in the context of the time. The author presents the crusades as a perversion of the defensive concept of 'holy war', without any reference to the preceding centuries of rapid Islamic expansion. The line is at least set out clear in the introduction, where the crusades are described as 'a frenzy of hate and violence unprecedented before the advent of the technological age and the scourge of Hitler'.

I had high hopes for this, as I have studied the crusades and think it is good to bring history to a wider audience, but I was very disappointed. A wasted opportunity.

Brilliant and entertaining, 06 Feb 2002
Although I fully agree with the 5 star-rating already given, I think this book also deserves an enthousiastic endorsement. After having in an earlier book uncovered a largely ignored period in European history (the highly informative and entertaining The Last Apocalypse, also available through Amazon), James Reston takes us now on the much more familiar path of the Crusades. He paints a vivid and colourful portrait of the third crusade's main characters, Richard the Lionheart, Saladin and Philip Augustus of France and gives us a refreshingly unbiased history of that expedition.
Mr. Preston has the narrative talent, the mischievous eye for less-than-elevated motives and telling anecdote that will make you want to read this book in one go. The fact that Richard and Philip were em, interacting homosexuals - the first the moustache and leather cap-wearing kind, the second more the bitchy hairdresser - is maybe mentioned a tad too often, but most other descriptions and background stories give a wonderful and highly readable insight in not only the third crusade, but also in the political situation and personal development of the main characters that propelled them to the center stage. You won't regret buying this book.

A book that should be read with the conflict in the M.E, 09 Jan 2002
For a start this book does not choose sides, so both muslims and chritians can read it. The book may be boring for those who do not like history but there is quiet alot of maps to show you what is going on and which may interest you. The only problem is that there are quotes which there is no information were they came from. Except that the book gives you an idea of the war that was really against two civilisations and which looks like a present conflict.

its a must buy..

A superb book, 26 Nov 2001
Reading this book has you believing that the crusade happened yesterday and that you are reading a news report. whereas most books on this subject take one side or the other this book is completely balanced in its argument. it has interviews with people at the time and a detailed account of events. although this is a fictional biography based on key historical events it makes the book all the more exciting to read and i recommend this book to anyone.

the crusader, 01 Oct 2008
one of the best books ive read in an age. a must read. just could not put it down, read twice and still thinking about it. twist and turns through out. enjoy.

Excellent, 02 Apr 2008
I found the first few pages to be intriguing, wondering where the author was going but after this - WOW - what a story. I had never before heard of this group of knights - Calatrava, perhaps because they are overshadowed by the Templars and Hospitallers, but this book made me look them up.

There are characters who really come to life and you get to love/ hate and laugh with them. Also great detail of the battles and the struggles that Francisco went through both physically and mentally. You also realise that the romance of the crusades was overshadowed by the plotting and scheming that went on between the different groups supposed to be fighting on the same side. The mention of how the Holy Inquisition converted people and "drove out demons " makes you think of the whole concept of religion. While little things like the Christian Prisioner being giving an apple by one of the guards are a good counterpoint to the evil of man in general.

I found it strange though to see the Muslims referred to as Infidels when normally this term is applied to Christians, but in the context of this book it is correct.

All in all a book that once started is hard to put down...... And an author who puts a glossary in his fiction novel... I wish many other authors would do this, as well as a Cast list - maybe I am getting old but these help.

Buy this book!, 26 Jul 2006
I have to admit that since buying this book, I had left it on my shelf for several months. After finally picking it up, I was amazed at how good it was. The story grips you from the start, and it is such a beautifully written book, i would reccomend to anyone.

A great adventure!, 24 Sep 2004
Michael Eisner has traced the story of a young nobleman, who leaves his comfortable existence in Spain to seek excitement and adventure on a crusade in the Holy Land. The story emerges through the eyes of his friend on his return to Spain, as he struggles to come to terms with his experiences. This is an interesting book historically, as well as a great adventure. A real page-turner, I recommend it!

Perfect blend of fact and fiction, 06 Mar 2004
The best fictional account of the Crusades I have yet read. Perfectly fusing fact and fiction to create a wonderfully authentic realisation of the Middle Ages, whilst managing to retain and develop a modern audience's sympathy and interest. Obviously thoroughly steeped in the period, Eisner has also crafted a gripping and human story. Occasionally he does get bogged down in details, and he spends perhaps too much time on the early pre-Crusade scenes establishing character and setting, at the expense of later scenes. More exploration and development of the military conflicts themselves would have been welcome, but this is a minor caveat.

All in all a wonderful read, ranking alongside the greats of historical fiction. Fascinating, gripping and ultimately deeply moving, this is as close to the total reading experience as you can get.

Skilfully weaving bloody conflict and intrigue and faith, The Mystic Rose concludes Stephen Lawhead's epic historical trilogy, The Celtic Crusades, in fine style. While the tightly constructed 435 pages can be read as a self-contained adventure, anyone doing so will miss many resonances with previous volumes, The Iron Lance and The Black Rood. With a framing narrative set in the early 20th century, Lawhead recounts a grand scale quest through medieval Spain and Anatolia around strong Celtic heroine Cait and the feared Knights Templar for the Holy Grail. This author has used the grail legend before, notably in the conclusion to the Pendragon Cycle, Grail, though here the approach is largely historical and while Lawhead's Christianity informs his writing he never preaches. He is a storyteller first, who by employing direct, folk-like narrative prose compels by making the reader care deeply about the fate of his characters. There are no soft options, and as in Lawhead's best work, Byzantium, strong interplay between Christian and Islamic values, all of the leading players fully rounded with vices and virtues. Less artful than Mary Gentle's in many ways comparable Ash, above all The Mystic Rose is an unpretentious romantic adventure which delivers a thrilling emotional punch. --Gary S. Dalkin

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

Excellent read!, 18 Nov 2008
As opposed to what others might have said, I think Robyn Young has not only managed to outshine her first book (the brethren - which I devoured in a few days only) but has been able to get myself fully absorbed in the history of the 13th century.

As I knew little of the time period, I found myself researching the main plots of the book and immersing myself ever more into the history of the mamluks, templars and the crusades.

As opposed to Bernhard Cornwell's taste for sometimes boring battle scenes (as they somehow seem to appear to be same over and over again in any of his books), I feel that Young puts more emphasis on developing her characters well and giving them believable non-20th-century-personalities. I guess, that this is the point, which many people might disagree about.

As a non-native English speaker, I loved once more her way of describing personalities and surroundings, which clearly arose in front of my inner eye.

I think, this book could be one of those, which I might actually read again after a few years, because it gave me a great deal of joy.

The only thing I didn't like was the book cover - as it looks to me like a fantasy book similar to the abominable Eragon.

Gripping read!, 30 Oct 2008
I'm not going to go into detail about the plot, many reviews here already give that information, but I will say that it's a fabulous, absorbing read. In parts, the tension is so fierce and consuming that you just don't want to put it down! Having read the first book of the trilogy I was familiar with the main characters. I now can't wait to get the third and final book to discover what further trials life brings for Will and 'Co'!

what a dull read, 25 Oct 2008
I got so bored with this book that i'm not even going to finish it. The books called crusade and so far i'm over half way through there hasn't been one exciting battle. The first one was average but i read though it in the hope that this one would be better but its not; and this one has the added bonus of being constantly reminded what happened in the first one. i know what happened i read it.

Good bedtime read for insomniacs, 09 Oct 2008
This is a poor one dimensional book. It is great to read at bedtime if you cannot relax, as this book will send you to sleep fast. I am persisting with this book on the grounds that it just has to get better! However it is hard to get stuch into more than a few pages at a time.

Both the Templar characters and the Muslim (in particular Muslims) are just so weak! None of the Muslim chracters do anything to enthrall the reader and the Templar ones really are not believable. The title is Crusade, but I am 3/4 the way through and I can see no sign of it happening. The implausable Garin character is a work of pure literary weakness.

Another reviewer said this is Mills and boon meets History, and I think that is rather accurate. I am a Historical fiction reader and other authors do a far better job than this.

An interesting read, 24 Jul 2008
This book was interesting from the depth of research about the period he was writing about would almost be a 5/5.

Unfortunately for me, the book was let down by its story line. The characters were poorly developed, at times aspect of the story line was fantastical, and bore minimal regard to realitiy and a lack of depth. A little staid the story is 3/5.

It didn't captivate. A shame, as it was set in an intersting time, with lots to play with :(

A border line 4/5 only for the historical aspects.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest of Jerusalum and the origins of the crusade. Scholarly, Epic and thoroughly engrossing. The author had a very engaging style. Recommended.

Best books, 14 Feb 2007
of the plethora of books i have read in all subjects, i have the best memories of these. Especially the first 2 books because they are not only vividly factual but also very flowing. there is strong character development and feels like Lord of the Rings meets the Kingdom of Heaven.

magisterial, 18 Dec 2007
First off, it is important to note that Runciman's work (now over 50 years old) has by and large been superseded by more recent scholarship - in particular that of Jonathan Riley-Smith. Runciman views the Crusades as the last of the 'Barbarian Invasions' and his work often reads more like a threnody for the declining Byzantine Empire than a self-consciously 'objective' account of events. For a more up-to-date (though drier) general history, you would be better off reading Christopher Tyerman's new 'God's War.'

However, it is still more than possible to read and enjoy 'A History of the Crusades' for what it is - an epic account of three hundred years of history, and an energetic demolition of the view (sadly still prevalent in some circles) that the Crusades were bold and heroic, or somehow 'defensive' in nature. Although some of the analytical material is somewhat dated, the book is eminently readable and exciting, and is in my opinion still the best general introduction to the subject. Enormously influential in its day and still of relevance.

Better than Lord of the Rings!, 27 May 2007
The final volume of this epic trilogy recounts the final days of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (of whose capital is now Acre). The book follows the battle of Hattin, and the increasing disunity within the kingdom. The book concentrates on the various political intrigues and personality clashes within the crusader states. The book picks up again half way through with an even larger threat to Islam, the Mongols. Another epic battle, Ain Jalud is covered, with the Muslims again recovering their lands. The book concludes with a commentary of the crusades. Cant wait to read The Fall of Constantinople also by Mr Runciman, which follows on from this trilogy.

As engrossing as the first volume. , 12 May 2007
This volume sees the arrival of the second crusade, political intrigues amongst the future generations. The rise of Sulahuddin and the collapse of the Frankish Kingdoms. The book concludes with the Battle of Hattin and the conquest of Jerusalem by Sulahuddin. At times is can be hard to keep track of who is who, there are generations of kings, princes and regents who share the same name. The family tree at the back of the book is a welcome aid.

A Truly Epic Account of the Crusades, 25 Apr 2007
Apart from the long lists of names that come thick and fast, this is an excellent account of the Crusades. Although some of the language seems a little dated, I feel that this adds to its appeal. The book begins with Caliph Umar's conquest