Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Engineering Council Examination recommended reading list, 09 Aug 2000
Recommended reading for the Engineering Council Part 1 Examination Subject 503, Engineering Science

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Engineering Council Examination recommended reading list, 09 Aug 2000
Recommended reading for the Engineering Council Part 1 Examination Subject 503, Engineering Science

If only all text books were like this..., 08 Nov 2000
First things first - this book is on the Finite Volume Method - amazon do not make this very clear (read the book cover picture).

Dry and heavy going this book is NOT. Over simplistic - no. This book takes you into the heavily mathematical and theoretical world of CFD and makes it seem like a walk in the park. The book is a mass of graphs, tables, flow diagrams and figures. The theoretical principles are clearly elucidated - they even have the unprecidented nerve to write verbal equations below the maths to clearly identify the significance of each element!

Seriously, I am delighted with this book. In ten years of blood sweat and tears, this is the first text in the field that I have read that makes the whole subject readable. I am no stranger to the production of course material being a lecturer by profession and this is excellent. The authors must have laboured long and hard to get the material to this level and I congratulate them... if only all text books were like this one.

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Engineering Council Examination recommended reading list, 09 Aug 2000
Recommended reading for the Engineering Council Part 1 Examination Subject 503, Engineering Science

If only all text books were like this..., 08 Nov 2000
First things first - this book is on the Finite Volume Method - amazon do not make this very clear (read the book cover picture).

Dry and heavy going this book is NOT. Over simplistic - no. This book takes you into the heavily mathematical and theoretical world of CFD and makes it seem like a walk in the park. The book is a mass of graphs, tables, flow diagrams and figures. The theoretical principles are clearly elucidated - they even have the unprecidented nerve to write verbal equations below the maths to clearly identify the significance of each element!

Seriously, I am delighted with this book. In ten years of blood sweat and tears, this is the first text in the field that I have read that makes the whole subject readable. I am no stranger to the production of course material being a lecturer by profession and this is excellent. The authors must have laboured long and hard to get the material to this level and I congratulate them... if only all text books were like this one.

Spot on book, for average A-level student., 21 Oct 2000
Good, clear, well presented book. Contains all the information you need...

The Best Mechanics study book around, 01 Sep 2000
This is one of the best study books which I have come accross for studying Mechanics. The text is written in a way in which I rarely do not understand an explanation - something which makes this book unique

An excellent introduction to A-level Mechanics, 28 Nov 1999
Provides a clear and concise guide through A-level Mathematics with Mechanics, with 'good answers', in that the results to many of the exercises are often integers, or simple fractions as to increase clarity. Also provides very clear examples to help the reader with the exercises. Overall, a very good text to read if studying A-level Mechanics.

Excellent text for A level, good diagrams, 25 Aug 1999
Wychwood school,Oxford has been using this as the main mechanics text book for the last ten years. The first few questions of each exercise encourage the use of good drawings. The recent new edition has kept abreast of A level changes. Exercises are well graded, with a range of past questions included. Answers are generally accurate too, unlike so many Maths text books

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Engineering Council Examination recommended reading list, 09 Aug 2000
Recommended reading for the Engineering Council Part 1 Examination Subject 503, Engineering Science

If only all text books were like this..., 08 Nov 2000
First things first - this book is on the Finite Volume Method - amazon do not make this very clear (read the book cover picture).

Dry and heavy going this book is NOT. Over simplistic - no. This book takes you into the heavily mathematical and theoretical world of CFD and makes it seem like a walk in the park. The book is a mass of graphs, tables, flow diagrams and figures. The theoretical principles are clearly elucidated - they even have the unprecidented nerve to write verbal equations below the maths to clearly identify the significance of each element!

Seriously, I am delighted with this book. In ten years of blood sweat and tears, this is the first text in the field that I have read that makes the whole subject readable. I am no stranger to the production of course material being a lecturer by profession and this is excellent. The authors must have laboured long and hard to get the material to this level and I congratulate them... if only all text books were like this one.

Spot on book, for average A-level student., 21 Oct 2000
Good, clear, well presented book. Contains all the information you need...

The Best Mechanics study book around, 01 Sep 2000
This is one of the best study books which I have come accross for studying Mechanics. The text is written in a way in which I rarely do not understand an explanation - something which makes this book unique

An excellent introduction to A-level Mechanics, 28 Nov 1999
Provides a clear and concise guide through A-level Mathematics with Mechanics, with 'good answers', in that the results to many of the exercises are often integers, or simple fractions as to increase clarity. Also provides very clear examples to help the reader with the exercises. Overall, a very good text to read if studying A-level Mechanics.

Excellent text for A level, good diagrams, 25 Aug 1999
Wychwood school,Oxford has been using this as the main mechanics text book for the last ten years. The first few questions of each exercise encourage the use of good drawings. The recent new edition has kept abreast of A level changes. Exercises are well graded, with a range of past questions included. Answers are generally accurate too, unlike so many Maths text books

Excellent for graduates, 18 Jul 2007
The style is straightforward. Fundamentals are covered. It does require a good level in maths (3rd-4th year of engineering degree that's all). Overall it's been very helpful in my PhD.

Comprehensive, but confusing, 10 Jan 2004
It is impossible to fault this book for not covering enough material with regards to the different classes of turbulence. However, the language used is overly complex; turbulence is a difficult subject to study and the initial chapters do not introduce concepts in an easy to understand manner. This would make a fantastic reference book, but as a study aid it falters slightly.

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Engineering Council Examination recommended reading list, 09 Aug 2000
Recommended reading for the Engineering Council Part 1 Examination Subject 503, Engineering Science

If only all text books were like this..., 08 Nov 2000
First things first - this book is on the Finite Volume Method - amazon do not make this very clear (read the book cover picture).

Dry and heavy going this book is NOT. Over simplistic - no. This book takes you into the heavily mathematical and theoretical world of CFD and makes it seem like a walk in the park. The book is a mass of graphs, tables, flow diagrams and figures. The theoretical principles are clearly elucidated - they even have the unprecidented nerve to write verbal equations below the maths to clearly identify the significance of each element!

Seriously, I am delighted with this book. In ten years of blood sweat and tears, this is the first text in the field that I have read that makes the whole subject readable. I am no stranger to the production of course material being a lecturer by profession and this is excellent. The authors must have laboured long and hard to get the material to this level and I congratulate them... if only all text books were like this one.

Spot on book, for average A-level student., 21 Oct 2000
Good, clear, well presented book. Contains all the information you need...

The Best Mechanics study book around, 01 Sep 2000
This is one of the best study books which I have come accross for studying Mechanics. The text is written in a way in which I rarely do not understand an explanation - something which makes this book unique

An excellent introduction to A-level Mechanics, 28 Nov 1999
Provides a clear and concise guide through A-level Mathematics with Mechanics, with 'good answers', in that the results to many of the exercises are often integers, or simple fractions as to increase clarity. Also provides very clear examples to help the reader with the exercises. Overall, a very good text to read if studying A-level Mechanics.

Excellent text for A level, good diagrams, 25 Aug 1999
Wychwood school,Oxford has been using this as the main mechanics text book for the last ten years. The first few questions of each exercise encourage the use of good drawings. The recent new edition has kept abreast of A level changes. Exercises are well graded, with a range of past questions included. Answers are generally accurate too, unlike so many Maths text books

Excellent for graduates, 18 Jul 2007
The style is straightforward. Fundamentals are covered. It does require a good level in maths (3rd-4th year of engineering degree that's all). Overall it's been very helpful in my PhD.

Comprehensive, but confusing, 10 Jan 2004
It is impossible to fault this book for not covering enough material with regards to the different classes of turbulence. However, the language used is overly complex; turbulence is a difficult subject to study and the initial chapters do not introduce concepts in an easy to understand manner. This would make a fantastic reference book, but as a study aid it falters slightly.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Engineering Council Examination recommended reading list, 09 Aug 2000
Recommended reading for the Engineering Council Part 1 Examination Subject 503, Engineering Science

If only all text books were like this..., 08 Nov 2000
First things first - this book is on the Finite Volume Method - amazon do not make this very clear (read the book cover picture).

Dry and heavy going this book is NOT. Over simplistic - no. This book takes you into the heavily mathematical and theoretical world of CFD and makes it seem like a walk in the park. The book is a mass of graphs, tables, flow diagrams and figures. The theoretical principles are clearly elucidated - they even have the unprecidented nerve to write verbal equations below the maths to clearly identify the significance of each element!

Seriously, I am delighted with this book. In ten years of blood sweat and tears, this is the first text in the field that I have read that makes the whole subject readable. I am no stranger to the production of course material being a lecturer by profession and this is excellent. The authors must have laboured long and hard to get the material to this level and I congratulate them... if only all text books were like this one.

Spot on book, for average A-level student., 21 Oct 2000
Good, clear, well presented book. Contains all the information you need...

The Best Mechanics study book around, 01 Sep 2000
This is one of the best study books which I have come accross for studying Mechanics. The text is written in a way in which I rarely do not understand an explanation - something which makes this book unique

An excellent introduction to A-level Mechanics, 28 Nov 1999
Provides a clear and concise guide through A-level Mathematics with Mechanics, with 'good answers', in that the results to many of the exercises are often integers, or simple fractions as to increase clarity. Also provides very clear examples to help the reader with the exercises. Overall, a very good text to read if studying A-level Mechanics.

Excellent text for A level, good diagrams, 25 Aug 1999
Wychwood school,Oxford has been using this as the main mechanics text book for the last ten years. The first few questions of each exercise encourage the use of good drawings. The recent new edition has kept abreast of A level changes. Exercises are well graded, with a range of past questions included. Answers are generally accurate too, unlike so many Maths text books

Excellent for graduates, 18 Jul 2007
The style is straightforward. Fundamentals are covered. It does require a good level in maths (3rd-4th year of engineering degree that's all). Overall it's been very helpful in my PhD.

Comprehensive, but confusing, 10 Jan 2004
It is impossible to fault this book for not covering enough material with regards to the different classes of turbulence. However, the language used is overly complex; turbulence is a difficult subject to study and the initial chapters do not introduce concepts in an easy to understand manner. This would make a fantastic reference book, but as a study aid it falters slightly.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

OK for timid students, 20 Sep 2000
I recommend Hand and Finch above this book, but for a student who only wants 2nd-year-level exposition, Kibble and B might be preferred. The contents are bland and ordinary and straightforward, and at times wrong. For example, K+B perpetuate the nonsense that gyroscopic effects are important when a bicycle is going round a corner. Anyone who has ridden a scooter, or bikes with very light wheels, indeed any bike at all, will know this is rubbish. The fact that they get this wrong makes me mistrust the whole of the rest of the book. Go with Hand and Finch. H+F is cheaper and takes you to graduate level!

Classical Mechanics at its best, 13 Jun 2000
This book is a perfect guide for an undergraduate student in either mathematics or physics. Many good books have been written dealing mainly with quantum mechanics and many physics students seem to have no real knowledge of classical mechanics. This book tries to restore the balance. The earlier chapters cover the topics of rigid bodies, the Lagrangian and Hamilitonian approach to mechanics, while in this later edition a few new chapters deal with Dynamical systems, order and chaos (which only add to the strength of this book) The refreshing thing about this book is that, unlike many textbooks it is easy to follow through private study which is a credit to the authors.

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Engineering Council Examination recommended reading list, 09 Aug 2000
Recommended reading for the Engineering Council Part 1 Examination Subject 503, Engineering Science

If only all text books were like this..., 08 Nov 2000
First things first - this book is on the Finite Volume Method - amazon do not make this very clear (read the book cover picture).

Dry and heavy going this book is NOT. Over simplistic - no. This book takes you into the heavily mathematical and theoretical world of CFD and makes it seem like a walk in the park. The book is a mass of graphs, tables, flow diagrams and figures. The theoretical principles are clearly elucidated - they even have the unprecidented nerve to write verbal equations below the maths to clearly identify the significance of each element!

Seriously, I am delighted with this book. In ten years of blood sweat and tears, this is the first text in the field that I have read that makes the whole subject readable. I am no stranger to the production of course material being a lecturer by profession and this is excellent. The authors must have laboured long and hard to get the material to this level and I congratulate them... if only all text books were like this one.

Spot on book, for average A-level student., 21 Oct 2000
Good, clear, well presented book. Contains all the information you need...

The Best Mechanics study book around, 01 Sep 2000
This is one of the best study books which I have come accross for studying Mechanics. The text is written in a way in which I rarely do not understand an explanation - something which makes this book unique

An excellent introduction to A-level Mechanics, 28 Nov 1999
Provides a clear and concise guide through A-level Mathematics with Mechanics, with 'good answers', in that the results to many of the exercises are often integers, or simple fractions as to increase clarity. Also provides very clear examples to help the reader with the exercises. Overall, a very good text to read if studying A-level Mechanics.

Excellent text for A level, good diagrams, 25 Aug 1999
Wychwood school,Oxford has been using this as the main mechanics text book for the last ten years. The first few questions of each exercise encourage the use of good drawings. The recent new edition has kept abreast of A level changes. Exercises are well graded, with a range of past questions included. Answers are generally accurate too, unlike so many Maths text books

Excellent for graduates, 18 Jul 2007
The style is straightforward. Fundamentals are covered. It does require a good level in maths (3rd-4th year of engineering degree that's all). Overall it's been very helpful in my PhD.

Comprehensive, but confusing, 10 Jan 2004
It is impossible to fault this book for not covering enough material with regards to the different classes of turbulence. However, the language used is overly complex; turbulence is a difficult subject to study and the initial chapters do not introduce concepts in an easy to understand manner. This would make a fantastic reference book, but as a study aid it falters slightly.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

OK for timid students, 20 Sep 2000
I recommend Hand and Finch above this book, but for a student who only wants 2nd-year-level exposition, Kibble and B might be preferred. The contents are bland and ordinary and straightforward, and at times wrong. For example, K+B perpetuate the nonsense that gyroscopic effects are important when a bicycle is going round a corner. Anyone who has ridden a scooter, or bikes with very light wheels, indeed any bike at all, will know this is rubbish. The fact that they get this wrong makes me mistrust the whole of the rest of the book. Go with Hand and Finch. H+F is cheaper and takes you to graduate level!

Classical Mechanics at its best, 13 Jun 2000
This book is a perfect guide for an undergraduate student in either mathematics or physics. Many good books have been written dealing mainly with quantum mechanics and many physics students seem to have no real knowledge of classical mechanics. This book tries to restore the balance. The earlier chapters cover the topics of rigid bodies, the Lagrangian and Hamilitonian approach to mechanics, while in this later edition a few new chapters deal with Dynamical systems, order and chaos (which only add to the strength of this book) The refreshing thing about this book is that, unlike many textbooks it is easy to follow through private study which is a credit to the authors.

5 Stars for Pure Genius, 08 May 2005
It scared the life out of me when I saw the size of this book but like paulsaunders18 said, don't be put off by the size of the book. I've read bits here and there and it does amaze me how Newton wrote this book, it's no surprise nobody could write anything to confront him. I really recommend this book to anybody that knows of Newton's works like F=ma, but that is all high school stuff. Newton really really makes you think hard in following his work which is an honour to read. No wonder he went mad. Buy it..quick..in the mean time do some weights.

The Principia, 28 Feb 2005
Sir Isaac Newton was lucky that it was an apple that struck him on his head, and not this book, its the size of a patio stone. But, please, don't be put off by this fact, it is broken down very well, and provides a great insight into the lives work of one of our Great Britains.

A world-altering classic, 04 Mar 2002
This book changed the course of science and human knowledge. Isaac Newton was one of the first natural philosophers to understand that mathematics could be used to predict the behaviour of natural phenomena. Rightly ranked as one of the three greatest mathematicians ever, this is his most famous work.

Better than some of the others in the series - but if you've got the textbook, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.
However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Very helpful and easy to follow., 03 Jan 2002
I found this book very helpfull when I had limited time to revise as most other books just weren't as clear.It's accurate, easy to understand and well written.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encourage those who wish to to use this book, it does actually work through everything satisfactorally, although occasionally as with most things with the new AS system, it sometimes leaves you hanging, telling you that you don't need to know this, but it will be shown in book Mn, where n is a number greater than the one you are currently on. This aside, a good book.

Not Sure ...., 31 Oct 2003
In helping my daughter with homework, I've come across 2 errors (answers), perhaps typos, and have not yet got to the end of chapter 3! Unfortunately, unlike many of the technical publications I use (IT, Web, Programming etc) I see nowhere on the publishers web site where you can report errors or see an on-going list of amendments you can make to your own copy.

If you've got the texbook- you've seen it before, 06 May 2008
Whilst the textbook in the same series may seem bright, colourful and easy to understand- don't expect the same quality from this revision guide. If you've got the textbook in this series they have just taken the same examples, questions and put them into a dreary and reptitive book that covers the same material in the same way. Whilst a few new examples and quick questions are dispersed there to keep some people happy- you would be better looking elswhere.

However, If you don't have the textbook from this series or are looking for a quick reminder of things- then buy it- otherwise its not worth your money.

Engineering Council Examination recommended reading list, 09 Aug 2000
Recommended reading for the Engineering Council Part 1 Examination Subject 503, Engineering Science

If only all text books were like this..., 08 Nov 2000
First things first - this book is on the Finite Volume Method - amazon do not make this very clear (read the book cover picture).

Dry and heavy going this book is NOT. Over simplistic - no. This book takes you into the heavily mathematical and theoretical world of CFD and makes it seem like a walk in the park. The book is a mass of graphs, tables, flow diagrams and figures. The theoretical principles are clearly elucidated - they even have the unprecidented nerve to write verbal equations below the maths to clearly identify the significance of each element!

Seriously, I am delighted with this book. In ten years of blood sweat and tears, this is the first text in the field that I have read that makes the whole subject readable. I am no stranger to the production of course material being a lecturer by profession and this is excellent. The authors must have laboured long and hard to get the material to this level and I congratulate them... if only all text books were like this one.

Spot on book, for average A-level student., 21 Oct 2000
Good, clear, well presented book. Contains all the information you need...

The Best Mechanics study book around, 01 Sep 2000
This is one of the best study books which I have come accross for studying Mechanics. The text is written in a way in which I rarely do not understand an explanation - something which makes this book unique

An excellent introduction to A-level Mechanics, 28 Nov 1999
Provides a clear and concise guide through A-level Mathematics with Mechanics, with 'good answers', in that the results to many of the exercises are often integers, or simple fractions as to increase clarity. Also provides very clear examples to help the reader with the exercises. Overall, a very good text to read if studying A-level Mechanics.

Excellent text for A level, good diagrams, 25 Aug 1999
Wychwood school,Oxford has been using this as the main mechanics text book for the last ten years. The first few questions of each exercise encourage the use of good drawings. The recent new edition has kept abreast of A level changes. Exercises are well graded, with a range of past questions included. Answers are generally accurate too, unlike so many Maths text books

Excellent for graduates, 18 Jul 2007
The style is straightforward. Fundamentals are covered. It does require a good level in maths (3rd-4th year of engineering degree that's all). Overall it's been very helpful in my PhD.

Comprehensive, but confusing, 10 Jan 2004
It is impossible to fault this book for not covering enough material with regards to the different classes of turbulence. However, the language used is overly complex; turbulence is a difficult subject to study and the initial chapters do not introduce concepts in an easy to understand manner. This would make a fantastic reference book, but as a study aid it falters slightly.

Shockingly bad..., 07 Sep 2007
I'm writing this purely from a student's point a view, moreover a student who hasn't quite grasped the concepts of mechanics very well over the years. The M1 book is hard to read; illustration of examples can often miss crucial explanation points making independent study a nightmare, and simple mistakes occur confusing the student [eg typos, wrong answers etc]. In comparison to the Core maths books, which clearly illustrate all examples and notes to remember making navigation and understanding child's play, the M1 book is lacking in key areas not giving the wealth of information required, especially for those who are studying alone/at home. Although, of course, some of it is fine, if you are going to study Mechanics from this book I would suggest finding other materials or resources [a teacher, other books etc] to support your learning unless you are already quite brilliant at the subject.

which edition, 20 Jan 2006
take care that the 1995? M2 book has been superseded by the edition published 2003?. the 1995 version is not very well written.

M5, 25 Jan 2004
This book gives a clear description of all the topics needed for M5. It has many worked examples which are helpful in showing you what you are actually supposed to do.
There is the occasional mistake here and there, but if you are doing M5, you should be able to spot that or at least feel a little uneasy.

M3 - Perhaps only for the few who do further maths, 14 Nov 2003
M3 is not an easy module.To be quite honest, I found D1 a lot easier. However, the hefty tome that is M3 is packed quite full of example questions and sample exam questions. Really, if you are considering taking this paper, and cannot recognise yourself when there is a mistake in the back of the book, then you might have some difficulty. Even so, I would encou